• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General News and Announcements
« Previous 1 … 13 14 15 16 17 … 46 Next »
[High Priority] Official Notice: Core ID/Tech cell change

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (5): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
High Priority Official Notice: Core ID/Tech cell change
Offline Traxit
07-27-2017, 04:53 PM,
#11
Sourdough
Posts: 1,184
Threads: 50
Joined: Dec 2012

The split is long overdue, but can I ask why 10% and not... 75? Aren't both ship lines coming from the same manufacturer, but slightly different?

[Image: eitgNHT.gif]
The best Video Game OST
Just Got Better
Reply  
Offline Toris (Old Account)
07-27-2017, 05:54 PM, (This post was last modified: 07-27-2017, 05:55 PM by Toris (Old Account).)
#12
Member
Posts: 373
Threads: 35
Joined: Mar 2017

I could never understand why not to make it both the same unified APM line and making it the open tech cell to all but unlawfuls.
Reply  
Offline Wesker
07-27-2017, 06:27 PM,
#13
Level 99 Boss
Posts: 5,296
Threads: 457
Joined: Nov 2014

You need to do this with blood dragon and hessian equipment too
Reply  
Offline Shaggy
07-27-2017, 06:57 PM,
#14
#BlameShaggy
Posts: 2,073
Threads: 157
Joined: Oct 2011

I do have to agree with @Wesker on this, it doesn't make sense for Gallic ships to be using Red Hessian, Blood Dragon or Core engines or thruster, let alone anyone else who is not even friendlies, allies or some what neutral with these factions, but are using there engines and thrusters just because of the looks. I do it just because it looks nice and makes the ship look good but don't make sense inRP. It should all be apart of the tech cell which does need a huge update.
Reply  
Offline Fish
07-27-2017, 06:59 PM,
#15
Member
Posts: 813
Threads: 116
Joined: Nov 2015

What does this mean for official factions who have inRP purchased ships from APM? I.E DSE, USI, Gateway.

[Image: 8iWW4WC.png]

Please PM me with feedback on my writing!

Reply  
Offline Kauket
07-27-2017, 07:17 PM,
#16
Dark Lord of the Birbs
Posts: 6,562
Threads: 506
Joined: Nov 2014
Staff roles:
Art Developer

(07-27-2017, 06:27 PM)Wesker Wrote: You need to do this with blood dragon and hessian equipment too

you probably boop the admins to add it via a request, tho I kinda agree that the new stuff should be on the tech chart, personally.
Reply  
Offline Traxit
07-28-2017, 12:09 AM,
#17
Sourdough
Posts: 1,184
Threads: 50
Joined: Dec 2012

(07-27-2017, 05:54 PM)Toris Wrote: I could never understand why not to make it both the same unified APM line and making it the open tech cell to all but unlawfuls.

Long story, but there's a split and I think it's sensible since both factions are not the same anymore.

[Image: eitgNHT.gif]
The best Video Game OST
Just Got Better
Reply  
Offline Toris (Old Account)
07-28-2017, 06:03 PM,
#18
Member
Posts: 373
Threads: 35
Joined: Mar 2017

(07-27-2017, 06:59 PM)Eurobeat Wrote: What does this mean for official factions who have inRP purchased ships from APM? I.E DSE, USI, Gateway.

This. What about that?
Reply  
Offline Toris (Old Account)
07-30-2017, 12:29 PM, (This post was last modified: 07-30-2017, 12:31 PM by Toris (Old Account).)
#19
Member
Posts: 373
Threads: 35
Joined: Mar 2017

(07-28-2017, 12:09 AM)Traxit Wrote:
(07-27-2017, 05:54 PM)Toris Wrote: I could never understand why not to make it both the same unified APM line and making it the open tech cell to all but unlawfuls.

Long story, but there's a split and I think it's sensible since both factions are not the same anymore.

The issue is, APM creates stuff both for BHG and the Core. It's the very same stuff in shape but with different materials (think 100 Euro vs 1000 Euro bikes here). I'd be all for unlocking the BHG counterparts to all but unlawfuls and rename it into Sirian Lawful techcell, it being perceived as more 'civilian' version of the APM equipment with more 'military' purpose for The Core.
Reply  
Online Goliath
07-30-2017, 12:31 PM, (This post was last modified: 07-30-2017, 12:32 PM by Goliath.)
#20
Acestacker Supreme™
Posts: 1,873
Threads: 121
Joined: Sep 2016

(07-30-2017, 12:29 PM)Toris Wrote:
(07-28-2017, 12:09 AM)Traxit Wrote:
(07-27-2017, 05:54 PM)Toris Wrote: I could never understand why not to make it both the same unified APM line and making it the open tech cell to all but unlawfuls.

Long story, but there's a split and I think it's sensible since both factions are not the same anymore.

The issue is, APM creates stuff both for BHG and the Core. It's the very same stuff, more or less. Just differently designed. I'd be all for unlocking the BHG counterparts to all but unlawfuls and rename it into Sirian Lawful techcell, it being perceived as more 'civilian' version of the APM equipment with more 'military' purpose for The Core.

Civilians are named so for a reason, Toris. You can't give the civilians APM technology out of nowhere. Just imagine every freelancer having Manta or Marlin, because they're one of the best ships ingame.

Practically, APM is based on AI amd nomad technology. And thus, you want to give the civilians Nomad tech? Really?

[Image: 9Joq1q5.png]
Reply  
Pages (5): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode