• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion Discovery Mod Bug Reports Archive
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 8 Next »
Discovery 4.91 Patch 12 Balance Changes [12/6/2019]

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (13): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 13 Next »
Discovery 4.91 Patch 12 Balance Changes [12/6/2019]
Offline diamond1
06-12-2019, 12:41 AM,
#11
Member
Posts: 923
Threads: 21
Joined: Nov 2015

While i'm not particularily pleased with the changes in the scatterguns, i was never good with 'em. I suppose i mostly stuck to a dual-nova setup. but now, to be fair, i might try letting go of using that and sticking with a snac and nova instead to try and get some neat kills. ( At least, until i die excessively due to ping clearly showing it misses. )

Offline Lythrilux
06-12-2019, 12:42 AM,
#12
Edgy Worlds
Posts: 10,362
Threads: 737
Joined: Jan 2013

(06-12-2019, 12:39 AM)Kazinsal Wrote:
(06-12-2019, 12:34 AM)Lythrilux Wrote: Was it though? That feels subjective, saying this as someone who initially advocated for the nerf.

It was always known to be a problematic weapon, it just existed for a reason that we solved long ago but due to the fact that it existed we couldn't just remove it.

Had we the knowhow to do on the fly weapon damage adjustments in 2010, we would have.

Most of the concerns I had seen were more for lore reasons (>shooting anti-matter) and how it wasn't very bomber-like - not that the weapon was broken or gameplay breaking in any regard. Granted, I felt like it was problematic because of how it coupled with the respawn timer. It's been reduced since the nerf, so I don't feel like it's an as big problem anymore.

[Image: Lythrilux.gif]
Offline Karlotta
06-12-2019, 12:45 AM,
#13
Banned
Posts: 2,756
Threads: 85
Joined: Sep 2016

Looks like SHFs will be useless again as soon as there is 1 enemy bomber present.

A better way to make bombers less useless against smaller craft would be
a: to increase their gun projectile speeds.
b: to decrease SNAC damage enough to not be instakill on an armored ship, and increase refire rate to make the weapon more useful.

Also, fighter gun range should be increased so they become more useful against large slow targets.

User was banned for: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=200950
Time left: (Permanent)
Offline Kauket
06-12-2019, 12:46 AM,
#14
Dark Lord of the Birbs
Posts: 6,564
Threads: 506
Joined: Nov 2014
Staff roles:
Art Developer

(06-12-2019, 12:42 AM)Lythrilux Wrote:
(06-12-2019, 12:39 AM)Kazinsal Wrote:
(06-12-2019, 12:34 AM)Lythrilux Wrote: Was it though? That feels subjective, saying this as someone who initially advocated for the nerf.

It was always known to be a problematic weapon, it just existed for a reason that we solved long ago but due to the fact that it existed we couldn't just remove it.

Had we the knowhow to do on the fly weapon damage adjustments in 2010, we would have.

Most of the concerns I had seen were more for lore reasons (>shooting anti-matter) and how it wasn't very bomber-like - not that the weapon was broken or gameplay breaking in any regard. Granted, I felt like it was problematic because of how it coupled with the respawn timer. It's been reduced since the nerf, so I don't feel like it's an as big problem anymore.

you do know that like majority of the game is highly unrealistic and bends the lore right

[Image: kauket.gif]
Offline Nepotu
06-12-2019, 01:04 AM,
#15
Thrower of SNACs
Posts: 857
Threads: 60
Joined: Jan 2011

(06-12-2019, 12:39 AM)Kazinsal Wrote: It was always known to be a problematic weapon, it just existed for a reason that we solved long ago but due to the fact that it existed we couldn't just remove it.

Had we the knowhow to do on the fly weapon damage adjustments in 2010, we would have.

Remove the SNAC for good or keep it as it has been since its birth ffs. It was a game mechanic that required the most skill and yet yeeted it. It's like a bazooka won't kill a man because was not designed for that, but still act normally against armored vehicles. Fly a bomber with SNAC and try to kill things with it. You will see it's not as easy as everyone believes to be.

[Image: Q83phBi.png]
Offline Thunderer
06-12-2019, 01:08 AM, (This post was last modified: 06-12-2019, 01:11 AM by Thunderer.)
#16
Tea Disposal Unit
Posts: 5,611
Threads: 463
Joined: Jul 2011

(06-12-2019, 01:04 AM)Nepotu Wrote: Remove the SNAC for good
Quoted and saved for later purposes. May I use it on my sig? [Image: avatar_18791.jpg?dateline=1554119697]))) joking

[Image: 396AUfe.png]
Bretonian Treaty Database Bretonian Armed Forces Recruitment Center
Bretonian Charter of Interstellar Law Bretonian Secrets Act
Offline Thexare
06-12-2019, 01:08 AM,
#17
Ominously Humming
Posts: 3,821
Threads: 340
Joined: Apr 2008

(06-12-2019, 01:04 AM)Nepotu Wrote: Remove the SNAC for good

Glad we're on the same page for a change.
Offline Markam
06-12-2019, 01:17 AM,
#18
Templar Enthusiast
Posts: 1,865
Threads: 122
Joined: Aug 2008

Snac gets a massive buff, and Nepotu is not happy.

If anything it has been buffed a little too much here, the larger SHF's will certainly be facing a considerable challenge to be useful now.

Plier and Shuttle may well reign supreme as fighter-bomber hybrids, they can now at least SNAC bombers trying to SNAC them.
Scale down of other SHF's maybe?

[Image: jVk71cR.png][Image: CNwiaZq.png]
Markam is evil
Offline Nepotu
06-12-2019, 01:19 AM,
#19
Thrower of SNACs
Posts: 857
Threads: 60
Joined: Jan 2011

(06-12-2019, 01:08 AM)Thunderer Wrote:
(06-12-2019, 01:04 AM)Nepotu Wrote: Remove the SNAC for good
Quoted and saved for later purposes. May I use it on my sig? [Image: avatar_18791.jpg?dateline=1554119697]))) joking

Do whatever ya want. As for removing the Snac...they already hurt the bombers, so why not hurt them even more. Remove them, remove bombers. Snubs will have no fear of being instaed anymore. People are just too dumb to understand even after explaining why this was a idiotic move in the first place

Stop swearing, please.~Markam

[Image: Q83phBi.png]
Offline Nepotu
06-12-2019, 01:20 AM,
#20
Thrower of SNACs
Posts: 857
Threads: 60
Joined: Jan 2011

(06-12-2019, 01:17 AM)Markam Wrote: Snac gets a massive buff, and Nepotu is not happy.

If anything it has been buffed a little too much here, the larger SHF's will certainly be facing a considerable challenge to be useful now.

Plier and Shuttle may well reign supreme as fighter-bomber hybrids, they can now at least SNAC bombers trying to SNAC them.
Scale down of other SHF's maybe?

Ofc I am not happy. This shouldn't have happened in the first place. Geez

Again, stop it with the swearing. ~Markam

[Image: Q83phBi.png]
Pages (13): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 13 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode