• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Rules
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 198 Next »
Please consider moving or changing IFF of POB

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Please consider moving or changing IFF of POB
Offline Lore
03-10-2020, 01:43 AM,
#11
Member
Posts: 34
Threads: 2
Joined: Jan 2020

(03-10-2020, 12:31 AM)Saronsen Wrote: reasons to move the base

its like right on top of baltimore and its gay

https://i.imgur.com/h6K4Dkt.jpg

[Image: Done.jpg]

[Image: wDbQLZV.png]
[Image: Z9hGKAw.png][Image: n5yTe2k.png][Image: 3bIXIin.png][Image: EtZxm17.png][Image: GvGBqrW.png][Image: 8BEfBZL.png][Image: 6vg5Gdt.png][Image: Tehffe7.png][Image: zIAlqWY.png]
Reply  
Offline Grumblesaur
03-10-2020, 02:03 AM,
#12
Fleet Tender
Posts: 2,742
Threads: 56
Joined: Sep 2008

(03-10-2020, 01:02 AM)Saronsen Wrote:
(03-10-2020, 12:51 AM)Grumblesaur Wrote: Great place for a rule suggestion!

The construction of player bases within 10K of any object that
  1. is dockable,
  2. is armed, or
  3. has an atmosphere or corona
shall be forbidden.

no

just let us move bases instead

sanction lancer is cancer and you need to stop suggesting more ways to get people sanctioned

Says the guy who just got sanctioned. Maybe you could just stop breaking rules?

A way a lone a last a loved a long the riverrun, past Eve and Adam's, from swerve of shore to bend of bay,
brings us by a commodius vicus of recirculation back to Howth Castle and Environs.
Reply  
Offline Egon Bigmemes
03-10-2020, 02:07 AM, (This post was last modified: 03-10-2020, 02:09 AM by Egon Bigmemes.)
#13
Member
Posts: 1,688
Threads: 106
Joined: Mar 2009

(03-10-2020, 02:03 AM)Grumblesaur Wrote: Says the guy who just got sanctioned. Maybe you could just stop breaking rules?
edit
[Image: mZPX5VH.png]
Reply  
Offline Altejago
03-10-2020, 02:10 AM,
#14
Resident Trucker
Posts: 1,798
Threads: 125
Joined: Aug 2010

This is too good! Backbone of the community right there.

(03-10-2020, 02:07 AM)Saronsen Wrote:
(03-10-2020, 02:03 AM)Grumblesaur Wrote: Says the guy who just got sanctioned. Maybe you could just stop breaking rules?
edit
[Image: mZPX5VH.png]

[Image: KUoTN2f.png]
  Reply  
Offline Nightowl
03-10-2020, 02:22 AM,
#15
Member
Posts: 385
Threads: 78
Joined: Sep 2018

The fact is that the PoB-Move requests are answered very inconsistently.
Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't, without it being clear to me in which cases it works and when it doesn't. The answers to this are extremely vague.

It is also not clear to me why an IFF change is impossible. Ok, let it cost money or sci-data and only do it via SRP request, but why this is not done is not clear to me ...


[Image: grp-Logo-green.png][Image: OSI-Logo%203D.gif][Image: SGN.png][Image: Society_Apocrypha_symbol.png]

This is a game, a Roleplay-Game!
Reply  
Offline Toga
03-10-2020, 02:29 AM,
#16
Member
Posts: 44
Threads: 18
Joined: May 2016

Require all bases to be a distance from other bases and require said holder of the base to role play and ownerships switching so it never happens again. That way if they go to switch and gov is like nah then they blow the base up for refusing to meet requirements
Reply  
Offline Victor Steiner
03-10-2020, 02:30 AM,
#17
Member
Posts: 1,836
Threads: 124
Joined: Oct 2016

Perhaps if the original owners actually took the time to think about what they were doing, we wouldn't have this issue.

Moving a base because someone didn't think it through, or didn't care to is not the dev's fault. Moving a base is a lot of hard work for little gain. That's why it's done so infrequently. Perhaps next time PoB owners will take that into consideration before actually building a base in a stupid location.

And it's not far, at all, to give someone a base and then turn around with a ''jokes on you, you have to move it now Big Grin''. That's most unfair and I don't have any sympathy for Libgov getting warned over that. Seems like an ''old boys'' club. ''You're not one of us so you can't have nice things''.

[Image: K21Vaai.png]
Reply  
Offline Egon Bigmemes
03-10-2020, 02:36 AM,
#18
Member
Posts: 1,688
Threads: 106
Joined: Mar 2009

Hard work for little gain?

Isnt it literally a single line in the pob .ini for the server?
Reply  
Offline Kazinsal
03-10-2020, 02:41 AM, (This post was last modified: 03-10-2020, 02:42 AM by Kazinsal.)
#19
Wizard
Posts: 4,541
Threads: 230
Joined: Sep 2009

It baffles me that weirdly aligned POBs are a thing at all. I guess whoever originally did the code for "700 metres forward" or whatever was a bit too literal with the definition of "forward".

(03-09-2020, 05:38 PM)SnakThree Wrote: Please consider the possibility of making new rule that allows IFF and location changes as long as it is not malicious, abusive or exploit.

Fun fact: for the longest time the base IFF command didn't actually stop anyone from making IFF changes and I can't recall a single instance of anyone using it for any reason other than to self-implement a legitimate fix that the then-admins were frankly too god damned lazy to do. Then someone narc'd and the functionality actually got implemented.

(03-09-2020, 05:45 PM)Cursetantine Wrote: I thought this wasn't done because of technical stuff. If that isn't the case I agree that it should be available for players to move their bases if RP is sufficient/demands it.

"can't do for technical reasons" was pre-coup adminspeak for "we're too lazy to look at the player request queue"

Retired, permanently.
Reply  
Offline Victor Steiner
03-10-2020, 02:49 AM,
#20
Member
Posts: 1,836
Threads: 124
Joined: Oct 2016

(03-10-2020, 02:36 AM)Saronsen Wrote: Hard work for little gain?

Isnt it literally a single line in the pob .ini for the server?

Yes and no, it's a location code with no references. So it's trial and error for moving something, really precise movements are difficult to implement.

But that really isn't the point of why Libgov got hit with a warning.

[Image: K21Vaai.png]
Reply  
Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode