Admin Note: Faction right #5

[pbrione]

Presumably admins will judge in individual cases whether or not there is sufficient justification for the move.

Might I ask if there is a simple facility such as a forum thread where such requests can be easily posted? Or is there a particular admin we should PM in such cases? (Or, heaven forbid, a secure flhook command? Not that that is probably workable).

---

Sir Stanley Nelson




<span style="color:#000066">Charles Canning </span><span style="color:#000066"> Foreign Secretary</span>

[Elsdragon]

About damn time

---

No longer a slave to the man!

[n00bl3t]

That is the shortest spiel I have seen regarding a rule or explanation for it.

Does that mean that an official faction can change an independent player's reputation to hostile without reason, since that is the way it sounds?

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.

[Sprolf]

That is the shortest spiel I have seen regarding a rule or explanation for it.

Does that mean that an official faction can change an independent player's reputation to hostile without reason, since that is the way it sounds?

I believe that they said you need to give them evidence.
Evidence is not produced without reason.

---

[n00bl3t]

I believe that they said you need to give them evidence.
Evidence is not produced without reason.

Some sort of role-play? Hmm.

Wait and see how it goes.

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.

[Sprolf]

Some sort of role-play? Hmm.

Wait and see how it goes.

Evidence and roleplay are certainly not synonymous.
Evidence might indeed be the complete lack of roleplay.

---

[casero]

For once, and I hate it, I think the same as N00bl3t, some sort of role play isn't good enough.

But, I really think that the admins understand about that, and they are not going to change reputations for small problems.

[mwerte]

There is a fairly detailed explaination in the link provided.

---

[Tovig]

Great news. Finally, officials factions have a tool against lolwuts.

[Dusty Lens]

That is the shortest spiel I have seen regarding a rule or explanation for it.

Does that mean that an official faction can change an independent player's reputation to hostile without reason, since that is the way it sounds?

I agree. Maybe you guys could provide us with some kind of explanation?

Edit: Shoot. I just noticed that there were two sentences, the second one consisting of a link. Maybe you guys could compress it into one sentence next time? My attention span aint what it used to be.