• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 311 312 313 314 315 … 547 Next »
Liberty HF/VHF/Bomber/thing

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard
Task Force Akhetaten - 0 / 10,000
Crayter Battlegroup - 0 / 10,000
Gaian Escort - 0 / 10,000
Atum's Battlegroup - 0 / 10,000
Wendigo Seekers - 0 / 10,000
Wendigo Interdictors - 0 / 10,000
Wild Hunters - 0 / 10,000
Wild Interceptors - 0 / 10,000

Latest activity

Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
Liberty HF/VHF/Bomber/thing
Geeky
04-24-2010, 11:42 PM,
#11
Unregistered
 

' Wrote:[Image: Stryker2.png]

was already thinking about replacing either defender or/and executioner with these, actually.

No offence, those doesnt look like replacements, they look like new models.
Reply  
Offline Korolia
04-24-2010, 11:43 PM, (This post was last modified: 04-24-2010, 11:44 PM by Korolia.)
#12
Member
Posts: 357
Threads: 21
Joined: Mar 2010

Replacing old redundant models.
Why would you replace the executioner with a ship that looks at 90% exactly the same like an... executioner, anyway? I don't see the point of it...

[Image: PrincessSignaturecopy.png]
There is no bathroom!
  Reply  
Geeky
04-25-2010, 12:08 AM,
#13
Unregistered
 

' Wrote:Replacing old redundant models.
Why would you replace the executioner with a ship that looks at 90% exactly the same like an... executioner, anyway? I don't see the point of it...
Not my point, the Executioner or defender has been the "Stock" Versions in the game. The Avenger and guardian however are the upgraded ones, thus the ones i feel should be replaced...
Reply  
Offline Shadow.Broker
04-25-2010, 06:35 AM,
#14
Member
Posts: 19
Threads: 4
Joined: Feb 2010

' Wrote:No offence, those doesnt look like replacements, they look like new models.

Isn't a a replacement supposed to be a new model? Your statement is contradictory. As for this ship? I had to double-take to see it properly. It's a hybrid. It just made me realize there is only a series of textures separating both factions.

[Image: Anonymous__by_rivo3622.png]
  Reply  
Geeky
04-25-2010, 07:32 AM,
#15
Unregistered
 

' Wrote:Isn't a a replacement supposed to be a new model? Your statement is contradictory. As for this ship? I had to double-take to see it properly. It's a hybrid. It just made me realize there is only a series of textures separating both factions.

New model meaning new ship if you have to grammar-nazi me...
AAchhh, what you get for trying to be nice..
Reply  
Offline Shadow.Broker
04-25-2010, 08:05 AM,
#16
Member
Posts: 19
Threads: 4
Joined: Feb 2010

' Wrote:New model meaning new ship if you have to grammar-nazi me...
AAchhh, what you get for trying to be nice..

What...? I feel sad now....

[Image: Anonymous__by_rivo3622.png]
  Reply  
Geeky
04-25-2010, 08:11 AM,
#17
Unregistered
 

' Wrote:What...? I feel sad now....

The first post in this discussion was meant as a compliment at Korolia...


Back on topic, i could have made it look less like the original ones but as i intended it to be a possible replacement for the avenger i wanted it to look sorta like a fusion.

since the Anubis was supposed to be the advanced Liberty fighter in rp.. I made a fusion of it, the bastet and avenger.
Reply  
Offline Shadow.Broker
04-25-2010, 08:54 AM,
#18
Member
Posts: 19
Threads: 4
Joined: Feb 2010

I see the logic there. The LSF would have Order-esque ships. Seeing as the Order WAS LSF.

[Image: Anonymous__by_rivo3622.png]
  Reply  
Offline Altaris
04-25-2010, 12:39 PM,
#19
Member
Posts: 780
Threads: 19
Joined: May 2008

It looks like mutation of Order Neph and Executioner.

I have no idea why is Executioner judged taht badly, but i personally like it.

Korolia@

It is more than clear, that your models wont act as LSF ships replacements. Why dont you submit them as some other models, rather than LSF. Trust me, there are lot more models that need replacements. Let the Avenger/Executioner be.

[Image: 101st-banner-captain.png]
Carnage itself flying within void...
Proud cardihead ever since 2008...
You all gonna eat cardi!
...also im a troll, so hate me.
  Reply  
Offline Korolia
04-25-2010, 04:03 PM,
#20
Member
Posts: 357
Threads: 21
Joined: Mar 2010

I don't agree with having ships using the exact same models but just different infocard and stats. It is clear that those need as much replacing as others. In fact, I do not see anything clear with -not- replacing redundant models.

[Image: PrincessSignaturecopy.png]
There is no bathroom!
  Reply  
Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode