• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 231 232 233 234 235 … 547 Next »
Techmix-nerf and factions which are unique in RELYING on techmixing

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (25): « Previous 1 … 21 22 23 24 25 Next »
Thread Closed 
Techmix-nerf and factions which are unique in RELYING on techmixing
Offline Cannon
12-20-2011, 01:45 AM, (This post was last modified: 12-20-2011, 01:46 AM by Cannon.)
#221
Ex-server monkey
Posts: 4,530
Threads: 1,161
Joined: Mar 2008

Hmm, I should add...

The main reason this exists is to allow people to use combinations of technology without having to ask permission. It is intended to let people ROLE PLAY the way they want to without having to wait or write novels to justify their role play. The consequence of role play that is out side of the storyline is slightly worse to terrible weapons performance depending of the combinations used.

Certainly there are players affected by this change. We will observe what happens and as always adjust things if the disadvantages outweigh the advantages.

With reference to factions that have special combinations, this probably will not be supported going into the future. The key issue here is providing fairness to all players. If a group can justify why they should get better and different treatment to other players then we will consider this on a case by case basis.

Proud member of "the most paranoid group of people in the community"
Old Avatar #2 | Old Avatar #3



Offline Petitioner
12-20-2011, 01:46 AM,
#222
a e s t h e t i c
Posts: 3,372
Threads: 294
Joined: Dec 2009

' Wrote:Don't be crazy, "I STOLE IT LOLOLOL" is far more realistic (even if I'm a 13 year old catgirl).
pardon my french, everyone.

that's ****ing sigged.

[Image: gamer5000.gif]

Recruitment | Task Force Prometheus | ICN FIRESTORM
 
Offline Ryummel
12-20-2011, 01:51 AM,
#223
Aoi Iseijin
Posts: 2,045
Threads: 87
Joined: Aug 2009

' Wrote:Hmm, I should add...

The main reason this exists is to allow people to use combinations of technology without having to ask permission. It is intended to let people ROLE PLAY the way they want to without having to wait or write novels to justify their role play. The consequence of role play that is out side of the storyline is slightly worse to terrible weapons performance depending of the combinations used.
So... just blank check to buy a LN Templar, shoot at RM with it and then have another Bretonia-Rheinland pewfest episode?

[Image: 9rXD1gi.png]
Offline Jayce
12-20-2011, 01:54 AM,
#224
Heads Will Roll
Posts: 2,167
Threads: 141
Joined: Nov 2008

This is beyond stupid. This is the dumbest thing I have ever heard. It's pissing on the people that have worked for their stuff before. Take me, for instance. I have at least 16 approved tech requests. All have been RP'ed ingame and on the forums. This is just taking (to quote Sindroms) a dum-da-dump on all my work.

This idea is bad and you should feel bad.

[Image: jKk7NOg.png][Image: 1iGGFXz.gif]
Blighter
12-20-2011, 01:59 AM,
#225
Unregistered
 

' Wrote:If a group can justify why they should get better and different treatment to other players then we will consider this on a case by case basis.

I'd buy it, but I'm HF. Paranoid by Nature, paranoid by RP, but I don't care that much at this point. The key thing you're missing is that it doesn't just just affect one or several factions or groups, it affects plenty of people outside of those too.

' Wrote:This is just taking (to quote Sindroms) a dum-da-dump on all my work.

This idea is bad and you should feel bad.

I hereby second what Jaec said and sign it.
Offline Petitioner
12-20-2011, 01:59 AM,
#226
a e s t h e t i c
Posts: 3,372
Threads: 294
Joined: Dec 2009

' Wrote:This is beyond stupid. This is the dumbest thing I have ever heard. It's pissing on the people that have worked for their stuff before. Take me, for instance. I have at least 16 approved tech requests. All have been RP'ed ingame and on the forums. This is just taking (to quote Sindroms) a dum-da-dump on all my work.

This idea is bad and you should feel bad.
Watch out, Sp[A]zzy "never existed" and if you quote him you might not exist, too.

BS BS BS BS.

[Image: gamer5000.gif]

Recruitment | Task Force Prometheus | ICN FIRESTORM
 
Offline Cannon
12-20-2011, 02:05 AM,
#227
Ex-server monkey
Posts: 4,530
Threads: 1,161
Joined: Mar 2008

Quote:So... just blank check to buy a LN Templar, shoot at RM with it and then have another Bretonia-Rheinland pewfest episode?

There are two scenarios here:

1. An official faction does this, i.e an [LN] pilot with a LN ID buys a templar and does this.
2. An indie with an LN ID does this.

For the first situation, I trust the official factions to sort this out and work for the good of the server and the factions they play with. If they screw up or do things out of spite then there would ultimately be role play consequences or sanctions against the official faction who initiated the situation.

For the second, if an indie LN pilot buys (steals in RP) the ship and attacks the RM then I can't see any reason why the RM, LN and BFA would not want to hunt down and kill the pilot. There is a potential rules issue here that possibly needs to be worked through but I'm sure we can find a solution.

For your example, it is the player's choice to do this. If the RM (stupidly) declares war on Bretonia for either situation then I will be very disappointed and there will be consequences.




Proud member of "the most paranoid group of people in the community"
Old Avatar #2 | Old Avatar #3



Blighter
12-20-2011, 02:05 AM,
#228
Unregistered
 

' Wrote:Watch out, Sp[A]zzy "never existed" and if you quote him you might not exist, too.

BS BS BS BS.

Yeah bollocks, the lore and histories and work behind most of the existing tech-permissions and ships both individuals and factions acquired over time, those too didn't exist. Ever. We're just hallucinating.
Offline Cannon
12-20-2011, 02:06 AM, (This post was last modified: 12-20-2011, 02:08 AM by Cannon.)
#229
Ex-server monkey
Posts: 4,530
Threads: 1,161
Joined: Mar 2008

Quote:This idea is bad and you should feel bad.

I do. I've considered quiting a number of times so that other people can do better.

Proud member of "the most paranoid group of people in the community"
Old Avatar #2 | Old Avatar #3



Blighter
12-20-2011, 02:07 AM,
#230
Unregistered
 

' Wrote:I do. I've considered quiting a number of times so that other people can do better.

Here's an alternative.

How about you just let the old stuff stay as is.
Pages (25): « Previous 1 … 21 22 23 24 25 Next »
Thread Closed 


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode