• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 162 163 164 165 166 … 779 Next »
2 interconnected ideas

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
2 interconnected ideas
Offline lIceColon
08-04-2013, 07:45 AM, (This post was last modified: 08-04-2013, 07:47 AM by lIceColon.)
#21
Member
Posts: 878
Threads: 89
Joined: Feb 2013

it's really just a simple bypass to the 2bil credits limit on a single character. right now a character can be worth no more than 2 bil otherwise it breaks. so we reduce the value of everything so that a character has to have 2 tril before it breaks. and it might make then $1s and $10s actually useful
edit: I just realised how stupid "thousand sirius credits" is. maybe "hundred sirius credits or even "10 sirius credits will work better. anyways the concept still stands

No atmosphere? GTFO.
The propeller is the greatest invention of all time.
  Reply  
Offline Remnant
08-04-2013, 07:56 AM,
#22
Member
Posts: 2,206
Threads: 248
Joined: Apr 2012

I don't think the numbers work that way, the game is locked at around 2 billion credits, but wouldn't all that do make it much more work to get anything?

Or am I still not understanding. Reducing the value of everything is only a deflation, the required work and time are still the same (assuming the trade routes are nerfed as well)
Reply  
Offline lIceColon
08-04-2013, 07:58 AM,
#23
Member
Posts: 878
Threads: 89
Joined: Feb 2013

exactly.
anyway I'm all for pricing everything @ their rp value.

No atmosphere? GTFO.
The propeller is the greatest invention of all time.
  Reply  
Offline Remnant
08-04-2013, 08:01 AM, (This post was last modified: 08-04-2013, 08:01 AM by Remnant.)
#24
Member
Posts: 2,206
Threads: 248
Joined: Apr 2012

Going on by what you said about "Making it harder to get everything"

Say you are a new player to Discovery, and you realize you cannot even buy a Rhino trade vessel without grinding missions for about eight hours streight. Even after then, you cannot upgrade any of your vessels or ships, because of the raw work needed to trade, and gather enough money even for a 'small' upgrade.

That seems slightly unfair to be making it harder. This goes under the assumption that everyone currently has loads of credits under their sleeves. Yeah, that may be true for some, but I'd say about over a quarter, that isn't true.

But yes. Rp value is rather good.
Reply  
Offline Markus_Janus
08-04-2013, 08:57 AM,
#25
Gaijin Slayer
Posts: 1,949
Threads: 103
Joined: Jun 2008

It could be good if everyone's accounts were also shrunk by 3/4ths to even it out.

Samura Omotai Zaibatsu.
[Image: qz7DdPp.png]
Reply  
Offline Sabru
08-04-2013, 11:16 AM,
#26
Member
Posts: 2,274
Threads: 262
Joined: Jan 2012

(08-04-2013, 07:11 AM)Crackpunch Wrote:
(08-04-2013, 07:02 AM)Jacen_Solo Wrote: Erm, wait. 3 billion battleship*0.25 = 750 millions, which's not much bigger than now. Taking in mind, that CAU8 will cost less than 250 millions, actual value of battleship will be lower than now. And for what? Making cheap fighters even cheaper?

Commodity prices would be lower too, so you'd make less profit. That would make earning 750 million credits much harder.

i actually get this. just scaling the whole economy down by 75%.

makes sense to me

[Image: 9KgNaeX.png]
Reply  
Offline Duvelske
08-04-2013, 11:22 AM,
#27
Banned
Posts: 990
Threads: 44
Joined: May 2012

I would agree with you zelot with the first post. It would make people have some ambition to work for some special ship wich price is just higher compared to other ships. And it would make sense inRP that it would be harder for shipyard x to build something then shipyard y. depending mostly on the materials their prices nearby.

User was banned for: Permbanned
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline pitockm
08-04-2013, 11:34 AM,
#28
Member
Posts: 471
Threads: 23
Joined: Dec 2011

lawl..just pointing at balance.

if i have a 3 bil ship...Lets say it should not get blown up by 2 bombers and their nova's.

any logic for Snac? and bomber role? imagine if snac was 895 millions Big Grin

That would be cool.
Reply  
Offline Thyrzul
08-04-2013, 11:47 AM,
#29
The Council
Posts: 4,684
Threads: 115
Joined: Sep 2011

The ideas sound good, so far got my approval. The economy shrink definitely does.

[Image: OFPpYpb.png][Image: N1Zf8K4.png][Image: LnLbhul.png]
Reply  
Offline Crossroads
08-04-2013, 12:55 PM,
#30
Member
Posts: 63
Threads: 2
Joined: Jul 2012

Good idea, this should make ships that are supposed to be rare rarer. No more battlegroups with more caps than snubs.

(08-04-2013, 11:34 AM)pitockm Wrote: lawl..just pointing at balance.

if i have a 3 bil ship...Lets say it should not get blown up by 2 bombers and their nova's.

I agree that if cap is harder to obtain and more rare, it should be buffed. BUT... how are we gonna deal with the absurd amount of caps the playerbase already have?
Reply  
Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode