Junker Congress

[Tenacity]

I'd join up if I werent investing all of my time, money, and effort into the Junker's Union right now. Speaking of which... I need more members, lol =P

---

[worldstrider]

I'd join up if I werent investing all of my time, money, and effort into the Junker's Union right now. Speaking of which... I need more members, lol =P

Ironically I got asked by five people within eighteen hours to join their groups right as I proposed this one.

It IS very time consuming doing a faction.

Thanks much to those who are helping.

---

[obnoxious1]

I also would like to see this one prevail & succeed, Has my support
Now to work on some deals....

---

Outcast Laws Outcast Reference Outcast Registry SOB / BLS Recruiting

[chovynz]

//Can we have a statement from you, Tink, about how your group is going
to work with the JU that Tenacity is building? I've heard from Tenacity a little
from his POV, but I'd like to hear yours in this thread.

And information on the workings with the Junker thing that "kevin" proposed
as well would be nice. I saw that heated debate and while it was nicely done
in RP (kinda) it did get a little tense, and has raised some concerns for me.

---

Seek fun and you shall find it. Seek stuff to Q_Q about and you'll find that, too. I choose to have fun.

[Tenacity]

I'll let tink make an official statement on it, but as far as I'm concerned all three of our groups are on allied terms - we're all junkers, so we're all family. The congress doesnt really seem to have a set area they operate in (though they are the primary junkers in liberty with the JU being based in rheinland and the other in bretonia) - from what I can tell the congress just helps out any other junkers or junker stations that are in need, they serve as a sort of central governing body for the rest of us. Congress members will definitely be getting respect from any of my own faction's pilots.

---

[worldstrider]

But let's actually let the Junker Congress faction proposal be about the Junker Congress and not use it as cross promotion please?

We'll do diplomacy when we are official. This is a chance for feedback on the Junker Congress not a general discussion of Junkers.

Thanks.

---

[Thexare]

Surprise, more comments from me.

Tag: .:j:.
Naming: either: .:j:.full_name or Forename.:j:.Surname

Considering that you haven't stated any reason for the two different naming options, I'm inclined to say it'd be easier and would look better to just pick one or the other. I prefer the first one, since it makes finding other members on the online list easier.

[chovynz]

But let's actually let the Junker Congress faction proposal be about the Junker Congress and not use it as cross promotion please?

We'll do diplomacy when we are official. This is a chance for feedback on the Junker Congress not a general discussion of Junkers.

Thanks.

Actually no. The Title is "Junker Congress, Faction creation request," which means you might like to answer
the diplomacy questions at least to a basic state. This is my feedback. I'm a Junker. I'm concerned about
whats happening with these three Junker factions. I'd like your POV on the matter Tink from the 'leader' or
organiser of the Junker Congress faction.. Tenacity could you please stick to your Junker thread? You've said
your bit. I'd like to hear from Tink (His POV which has yet to be stated publicly or said from himself, instead of quoted.)

If you really don't want to say so publicly would you mind pming me Tink?

//Can we have a statement from you, Tink, about how the JUNKER CONGRESS is going
to work with the JU that Tenacity is building? I've heard from Tenacity a little
from his POV, but I'd like to hear yours in this thread.

And information on the workings with the Junker thing that "kevin" proposed
as well would be nice. I saw that heated debate and while it was nicely done
in RP (kinda) it did get a little tense, and has raised some concerns for me.

---

Seek fun and you shall find it. Seek stuff to Q_Q about and you'll find that, too. I choose to have fun.

[worldstrider]

Actually no. The Title is "Junker Congress, Faction creation request," which means you might like to answer
the diplomacy questions at least to a basic state. This is my feedback. I'm a Junker. I'm concerned about
whats happening with these three Junker factions. I'd like your POV on the matter Tink from the 'leader' or
organiser of the Junker Congress faction.. Tenacity could you please stick to your Junker thread? You've said
your bit. I'd like to hear from Tink (His POV which has yet to be stated publicly or said from himself, instead of quoted.)

If you really don't want to say so publicly would you mind pming me Tink?

I don't mind telling you--its not a problem or secret. But this is a faction CREATION request. It's to look over the proposal. See if it is logical has any inconsistencies, get a clear view of how it will interact with the Discovery universe. I can't merge that with a discussion about groups that haven't even started yet and that I have no ideas what their day to day operations and specific diplomacy will be. If you read my proposal, it includes our stance towards other groups of Junkers...which is completely positive. What you are asking I, "Will I be allied with these new factions when they appear." I can't answer that until I see a formal presentation of exactly what they are doing.

It's also a bit unfair to throw two "emerging groups" that haven't formed yet into this as if I have to endorse or reject them. I do neither. When they are active and have a formally presented proposal I'll have a formal response.

Of the three "Junker factions" only one has a formal proposal up and has been in play for awhile. The others have yet to develop themselves. I'm not tying myself into them or excluding them. They are Junkers, we'll get along..but they are not "sub-groups" of this faction. They are separate and independent from it.

I'll PM you specifically.

---

[Thexare]

Ah, Tink? Mind scrolling up a few posts and addressing my tag comment? I think it got lost in the discussion about other Junkers.