• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 84 85 86 87 88 … 779 Next »
Sorry what?

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (8): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 8 Next »
Sorry what?
Offline Chuba
12-19-2015, 02:14 AM,
#21
uwu
Posts: 1,519
Threads: 40
Joined: Sep 2013

(12-19-2015, 02:13 AM)Durandal Wrote:
(12-19-2015, 02:11 AM)Nyx Wrote: is this april the first?

is it really?

I mean, good effort on trying to make mortars not useless, but, they're still somewhat useless. They certainly need a bit more of a damage buff.


Oh yeah nerf the Geb already it's tiny as heck, and give a minor buff to the Mako, it's just deathbait.

[Image: w0lvt.jpg]

but geb is so retardedly overpowered
Reply  
Offline Kauket
12-19-2015, 02:15 AM,
#22
Dark Lord of the Birbs
Posts: 6,548
Threads: 506
Joined: Nov 2014
Staff roles:
Art Developer

Yeah. Same length, but it's bloody width matters too.
It's a black floating stick.
Reply  
Offline Wesker
12-19-2015, 02:17 AM,
#23
Level 99 Boss
Posts: 5,294
Threads: 457
Joined: Nov 2014

(12-19-2015, 02:13 AM)Durandal Wrote:
(12-19-2015, 02:11 AM)Nyx Wrote: is this april the first?

is it really?

I mean, good effort on trying to make mortars not useless, but, they're still somewhat useless. They certainly need a bit more of a damage buff.


Oh yeah nerf the Geb already it's tiny as heck, and give a minor buff to the Mako, it's just deathbait.

[Image: w0lvt.jpg]

I cant even.

Stupidity on so many levels

[Image: P6DLUCr.png?4][Image: AX5RcTh.png?4]
Reply  
Offline Chuba
12-19-2015, 02:17 AM,
#24
uwu
Posts: 1,519
Threads: 40
Joined: Sep 2013

(12-19-2015, 02:15 AM)Nyx Wrote: Yeah. Same length, but it's bloody width matters too.
It's a black floating turd
Reply  
Offline FallenKnight
12-19-2015, 02:18 AM, (This post was last modified: 12-19-2015, 02:20 AM by FallenKnight.)
#25
Member
Posts: 1,077
Threads: 69
Joined: May 2010

Most players posting here, with exceptions to few, have no understanding of why the devs have done that. Its quite simple - Cerberus are so much good in their "duty" that they've become like "integrated" to every battleship in the game and if you have none then you lose in 1v1 (bb vs bb) scenario in close range of below 3k or in short - you are diminishing your dps by thousands.

Meanwhile a lot more options are available like missles, razors and mortars but both of them are obsolete to mount in comparison with the cerberus. So the choice to nerf Cerberus will make them less useful to mount in Heavy Slot - but in same time will make other heavy weapons more useful as well. So this "nerf" is also close to "buff" to missles, razors and mortars - which will be viable now.

And also most important change that this fix will handle will be...the "fast" battleship battles. Without cerberus as primary long range spam tool - battleships will participate longer on the battlefield and provide more of what they can to offer. Think of it as a buff to battleships where they will increase their suitability on the field.

And before you start throwing rocks at me - I love battleships and my main char was stuck in one for years. I am rusty now but I've trained a lot of players in the past and have good understanding of these ships. Back then cerberus were not so viable and battles were longer. After implementation of "new" cerberus with 45k shot damage - things changed badly and 1v1 or (bb vs bb) battles become dull...super dull. Now the challenge would be far more greater.
Adapt to the changes and dont while because someone nerfed a weapon that had to be handled before years.

[Image: HEdQNeI.png]
[Image: iELcapo.png]
Discovery Bridges[Feedback] Baron Piett[Biography]
Reply  
Offline Connor
12-19-2015, 02:20 AM, (This post was last modified: 12-19-2015, 02:23 AM by Connor.)
#26
Nomadmin
Posts: 3,606
Threads: 327
Joined: Aug 2012

@FallenKnight It's all good nerfing them but nerfing them to the point that they're useless? Caps don't fight at 1500m or less. You may as well remove them from the game. Not even cruisers and battleships fight at that range. The devs are very good at nerfing things far to far and then slowly buffing them back up back to where they originally were.

Edit: Cerbs at this range are just asking for more decloaking ships

[Image: Snoopyman.gif]
Reply  
Offline Lythrilux
12-19-2015, 02:22 AM,
#27
Edgy Worlds
Posts: 10,356
Threads: 737
Joined: Jan 2013

It's also going to cause a tremor through cap balance as a whole. What are light battleships supposed to do now? They don't have the core or the (maybe not all of them) have suitable slots for mortars. Cerbs, if ever used after this, are going to be the only viable option. Considering light battleships will have to get close to use them, they'll just get utterly screwed,

[Image: Lythrilux.gif]
Reply  
Offline Wesker
12-19-2015, 02:23 AM,
#28
Level 99 Boss
Posts: 5,294
Threads: 457
Joined: Nov 2014

Your implying that razors should be used to fight in 1v1 BS combat or mortars.

Thats hilarious.

[Image: P6DLUCr.png?4][Image: AX5RcTh.png?4]
Reply  
Offline FallenKnight
12-19-2015, 02:24 AM, (This post was last modified: 12-19-2015, 02:33 AM by FallenKnight.)
#29
Member
Posts: 1,077
Threads: 69
Joined: May 2010

To be honest, as battleship orientated player, I would like to see all cerberus removed while "primary" turrets of all factions - changed to be slightly more powerful to compensate. Also all of them to be distinctive per faction but not by 25-100 damage difference but very noticable speed/range/damage/efficiency.

A RM bs with triple turrets should do more damage with its primary weapons, at very distant range at the cost of more energy drain, An Order BB with small single barrel primaries should do less damage, with greater refire rate, less energy dependent but with limited range and etc....

Primaries in vanila have different animations and definitely could be turned in epic "faction specific" weapons, while cerberus are just ugh...Really hate them.

(12-19-2015, 02:23 AM)Wesker Wrote: Your implying that razors should be used to fight in 1v1 BS combat or mortars.
Like always you and I are not to understand each other. I said that other types of weapons will be more viable/useful. I never stated they will be useful only for bb vs bb...which would be hilarious. Point is that missles will be once again a good choice for Anti GB/CR duty. Razors will be nice Sniper weapon for Anti-bomber/GB...Mortars for Anti-BB duty and etc...which leads all weapons to be useful in different occasions. Currently that is impossible for Cerberus are above all. With the nerf things will be different.

(12-19-2015, 02:22 AM)Lythrilux Wrote: It's also going to cause a tremor through cap balance as a whole. What are light battleships supposed to do now? They don't have the core or the (maybe not all of them) have suitable slots for mortars. Cerbs, if ever used after this, are going to be the only viable option. Considering light battleships will have to get close to use them, they'll just get utterly screwed,
Back at 2009-12 (.85 era) battleships were armed with <insert number> primaries and 1 mortar or <insert number> solaris and 1 mortar. Point is that all battles were won from maximum range with "primaries"....no cerberus. So, right now each battleship can use 4 primaries, meaning time to kill other BB will be longer, the player will participate longer on the field and overall it will require more skill to be good instead to close eyes, go 2.5km with valor and nuke <insert battleship name> due to superior armor and epic damage output.

Don't worry...light battleships proved to be epic back then and won't suffer at all...dunkirks and overloads were famous with sniper builds. Hidamari in first place was quite good with Quadruple Pulses and heavy mortar. These were the days to experiment with a lot of different builds instead to put cerberus and call it a day.

[Image: HEdQNeI.png]
[Image: iELcapo.png]
Discovery Bridges[Feedback] Baron Piett[Biography]
Reply  
Offline jide
12-19-2015, 02:27 AM,
#30
Member
Posts: 298
Threads: 55
Joined: May 2008

keep calm! lets try it! whine about it later! Arguing right now is worthless. Keep in mind its not "final" and cerbs nerfs will be review and buffed back by devs if needed.

Jumping to fast to conclusion only tear us apparts and often make a thread become "war ground" between users!.

Proud member of the most hated faction

[Image: avatar_10099.png?dateline=1433281995]
  Reply  
Pages (8): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 8 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode