• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Player Requests Official Faction Requests Official Faction Creation Requests Archived Creation Requests
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Wisp Innovations

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Wisp Innovations
Offline Laz
12-31-2015, 08:44 PM,
#21
(Sorta) Retired Code Monkey
Posts: 1,904
Threads: 106
Joined: Jan 2014

(Please note I am trying not to be bias here)

Personally I believe that this is a bit rushed. It is quite rare for a faction to become official so early and is better off waiting.
Good Luck.

Reply  
Offline Wisp Innovations
02-26-2016, 03:45 PM,
#22
Member
Posts: 47
Threads: 11
Joined: Nov 2015

According to the new official faction rules, our officialdom period should end today.

We updated the first post with the most recent information, you will also find the main information page updated.

[Image: WtQ4lIV.png] [Image: ERslesw.png]
Information -- Branches -- Archives -- Communications Centre -- Employee Database -- JOIN US
Reply  
Offline Jansen
02-26-2016, 08:35 PM,
#23
Member
Posts: 4,110
Threads: 501
Joined: Jan 2009

According to the new official faction rules this is correct. However, according to the creation date of your faction status, you made this before the new faction rules were introduced, there is no note that these are retroactive, which means that the old rules apply.

[Image: HkdyBql.gif]
Reply  
Offline Laura C.
02-27-2016, 11:25 AM,
#24
Member
Posts: 1,445
Threads: 51
Joined: Dec 2011

My two cents:

I don´t have much experience with Wisp, but it seems there is quite a lot of roleplay going on so it looks good. But what I find quite worrying is attitude showed in this thread. In my opinion ability to handle feedback and criticism is important part of what official faction should be able to do. So it is really not good to see that there are more than two pages in this thread, mainly negative posts, but they are blatantly ignored and left without any attempt to discuss them by faction leadership and tell people your point of view, or you disagree with what they said and why, or that your faction changed. Basically some response. But only postst dropped by faction account are adressed to admins - thanks for adding to tracker and "knock knock, isn´t time to vote about our official status dear admins?" type of post.

In my opinion you are undermining your request by this attitude. If I were an admin, I would see this as serious reason why to consider voting against your officialdom.

On a ragebreak. Or ragequit. Time will tell.
Reply  
Offline Jack_Henderson
02-27-2016, 11:30 AM,
#25
Independent Miners Guild
Posts: 6,103
Threads: 391
Joined: Nov 2010

IMG has great roleplay with Wisp and it is time that Cryer has some official representative. I do not care much who of the contestants gets the officialdom sticker (admins are there to decide that), but we need an official faction to shape the indie faction and flesh it out some more. Some compromises might be needed, so that the official faction is not a too specialised nieche aspect of the whole ID, but I believe this can be worked out (or my perception is wrong, which could also be the case).

And while I agree with @Laura C. that feedback could be handled better, it's somewhat unfair to focus on that one when you see how many veteran official factions handle their feedback. It's by no means exceptional.

+ IMG| DISCORD: https://discord.gg/TWrGWjp
+ IMG| IS RECRUITING: Click to find out more!
Reply  
Offline Corile
02-27-2016, 11:36 AM, (This post was last modified: 02-27-2016, 11:42 AM by Corile.)
#26
C::iemka pl
Posts: 3,248
Threads: 267
Joined: Apr 2014

From my experience, forum feedback is flawed and unresponsive and it exists only for people to vent their sałt. Sorry, no offence, but it's true.

The questions raised before have been answered on skype or pm, this is where I'd suggest directing any future questions or suggestions as I'd prefer to limit the faction's oorp presence on the forums as it serves nothing but frustration.




Reflections on the Revolution in Gallia
Custodi // High City of Heraklion // The Cult of Archangels
Log Filter // Post Creator // Manhattan
  Reply  
Offline Kruger
02-27-2016, 07:33 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-27-2016, 07:37 PM by Kruger.)
#27
Member
Posts: 963
Threads: 157
Joined: Sep 2010

Before you proceed with this faction, i recommend you to change. Because this:

Original link:
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/MrHud...tfile1.txt
Quote:It's hardly difficult to see that there are some official factions in Discovery that worked hard to become official and remain so. It's also hardly difficult to notice that many currently official factions have stayed official just because of time and have grown to take their officialdom for granted, absolutely disrespecting both the server rules and roleplay standards.

We feel that Kruger has over the past years become such a faction. They have harassed other both official and unofficial factions in-game through means of metagaming knowing that they aren't able to fight back due to ID limitations, game limitations (cloak disruptors haven't solved the problem at all) or just because these factions are better than that. And still, when attempted to confront that through means of sanctions or actual healthy competition, the case is swept under the rug or everything is denied. This is frustrating for everyone being on the opposite side of the fence.

This is not the simple sa.lt you see on the forums every day. This is not just a sour taste in mouth because of a lost fight. This is quite literally years of continued frustration stemming out of a faction that just on the basis of their activity and superficial forum RP managed to keep themselves afloat and consequentially make the gameplay repugnant for several factions whose leaders decided to send this request, too.

We would like to ask the administration team to reconsider the status of Kruger| official faction and monitor their activities to see if their behaviour changes. If it doesn't, we ask to remove their official status to allow for emergence of a faction with more interest in roleplay and healthy competition.

Signed by:
Is not quite funny, there are 2 sides on every page. You just made this, because you got pirated by some krugers on a liberty corporation id. Does not give you the right to troll around and shout wherever you want. Sure you can point out your own view and there is nothing wrong with that, but remember that we are all humans we make mistakes. Your communication post to Kruger is merely because you hoped to get something in return, a sanction on kruger for your transports being attacked or a roleplay consequence. Something you did put quite clearly in the discovery leadership chat, please change your behaviour. It is a game, do not let it influence yourself or this faction you guys try to run so negatively.

Thank you for reading, please pm if you want to respond.

[Image: Kruger_banner.png]
Reply  
Offline Wisp Innovations
03-26-2016, 01:44 PM,
#28
Member
Posts: 47
Threads: 11
Joined: Nov 2015

We have updated the first post to reflect all the recent faction projects. Our main information post will also be updated after the decision about our officialdom.

[Image: WtQ4lIV.png] [Image: ERslesw.png]
Information -- Branches -- Archives -- Communications Centre -- Employee Database -- JOIN US
Reply  
Offline Vito
03-28-2016, 07:22 AM, (This post was last modified: 03-28-2016, 07:22 AM by Vito.)
#29
Member
Posts: 988
Threads: 30
Joined: Mar 2010

Wisp brings new opportunities to the Corsair Empire and I like that. Asking for permission from the CoE and choosing a corsair shipping organization for Sitka was also a smart move so as far as I can tell Wisp is moving in the right direction as far as the omicrons are concerned.

Godspeed!

The Corsair Trade Company

Information | Feedback | Communication Center | Recruitment
  Reply  
Offline Arioch
04-12-2016, 06:16 PM,
#30
Retired Zoner Overlord
Posts: 1,938
Threads: 219
Joined: May 2011

Officialdom request failed - Pm staff for details

[Image: drrobe.gif]
Reply  
Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode