• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion Discovery Mod Balance
« Previous 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 55 Next »
The hell with the new GB turret system!

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
The hell with the new GB turret system!
Offline Exploration
01-13-2016, 03:14 AM, (This post was last modified: 01-13-2016, 03:15 AM by Exploration.)
#21
Member
Posts: 685
Threads: 80
Joined: Mar 2012

Jesus okay. I'm not very good at PvP. Previously back in 86-87 era i was at least reasonable with a variety of ships. I can still be a challenge in a GB with the loadout changes and i can still be significant with a Battleship with the loadout changes (When my internet works, that is). All this does is make me rethink my tactic in game. I'm glad the dev's are taking steps to make things interesting and mix things up a bit. Can we please stop seeing these threads now.
Reply  
Offline Gulryz
01-13-2016, 03:15 AM, (This post was last modified: 01-13-2016, 03:15 AM by Gulryz.)
#22
Member
Posts: 1,498
Threads: 123
Joined: Jan 2013

(01-13-2016, 01:12 AM)Killer Wrote: Why dont you admins make a votes for the changes youre about to made,eh? Ooh,cuz you dont care what do we want! So,now gunbouts can be removed and all just get one fat ugly battleship and forgot about snubs!

I went through this thread and everyone seem happy with changes it's just you yelling around, So please don't say "WE" instead say "I" , I don't fly caps but read comments of some people who I know fly caps pretty good, So please take some orange juice and see the good side of changes as well, Devs don't want to destroy this game as you are thinking right now they just want to make it better
~Devil

[Image: AJzyu7E.png]

You can ignore reality but you can not ignore consequences of ignoring reality
Reply  
Offline E X O D I T E
01-13-2016, 04:11 AM,
#23
Banned
Posts: 1,007
Threads: 133
Joined: Mar 2013

Corvo only has 1 heavy mount fyi. Could you make weapon mounts 1 and 2 heavy then?

User was banned for: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=182360
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline |nfrared
01-13-2016, 05:16 AM,
#24
Member
Posts: 588
Threads: 62
Joined: Jan 2014

(01-13-2016, 01:12 AM)Killer Wrote: Why dont you admins make a votes for the changes youre about to made,eh? Ooh,cuz you dont care what do we want! So,now gunbouts can be removed and all just get one fat ugly battleship and forgot about snubs!

I'm going to give you some advice and this could really help 99% of people - You are venting your rage in the wrong direction. The admin team does not make these changes or have any say in them, the balance team aka devs, do.

Shard - The Faceless One
Reply  
Offline Findarato Veneanar
01-13-2016, 06:12 AM,
#25
Member
Posts: 421
Threads: 15
Joined: Sep 2012

(01-13-2016, 04:11 AM)Paladin Wrote: Corvo only has 1 heavy mount fyi. Could you make weapon mounts 1 and 2 heavy then?

The larger powercore is really wasted without 2-3 heavy slots on the corvo.

Signatures may not be bigger than 700x250, 1MB. ~Skorak

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EddX9hnhDS4 https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/6623...%20Sig.png http://i.imgur.com/BpOtRCf.jpg -My stance on all the censorship in this community.
|:~ TBS ~:|:~ LMP ~:|:~ BMF ~:|:~ SW ~:|
  Reply  
Offline Laura C.
01-13-2016, 08:42 AM, (This post was last modified: 01-13-2016, 08:42 AM by Laura C..)
#26
Member
Posts: 1,445
Threads: 51
Joined: Dec 2011

(01-13-2016, 02:26 AM)Killer Wrote:
(01-13-2016, 02:02 AM)Laura C. Wrote: Oh my, another drama maker which can´t use his favourite setup anymore and now shouts about ruined class (which by the way was previously known to be overpowered).

(01-13-2016, 01:12 AM)Killer Wrote: Why dont you admins make a votes for the changes youre about to made,eh? Ooh,cuz you dont care what do we want! So,now gunbouts can be removed and all just get one fat ugly battleship and forgot about snubs!
First, admins don´t make this, it is dev work. Second, battleships are already ruined too. At least Black Widow said so when he made like three similar rage threads because of turret change. Oh well, what will we do, two classes already ruined! Isn´t time for final nail calling now?

Tell me what was the reason to post that? Ah?You proved you can read and write? If you came here to say what I sayed already then what is unnecessary.

Reason was to tell you to not be dramaqueen over something what so far seems to be "gunboat class killing decision" only for you. So in fact I came and said exact opposite of what you said.

Also I came to tell you that you are barking up the wrong tree because you obviously didn´t know who is making ship changes and thus blamed wrong part of staff for it. You are welcome.

On a ragebreak. Or ragequit. Time will tell.
Reply  
Offline Black Widow
01-13-2016, 11:00 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-13-2016, 11:03 PM by Black Widow.)
#27
Totally no longer on probation
Posts: 2,351
Threads: 230
Joined: Jun 2008

(01-13-2016, 03:15 AM)Devil Wrote:
(01-13-2016, 01:12 AM)Killer Wrote: Why dont you admins make a votes for the changes youre about to made,eh? Ooh,cuz you dont care what do we want! So,now gunbouts can be removed and all just get one fat ugly battleship and forgot about snubs!

I went through this thread and everyone seem happy with changes it's just you yelling around, So please don't say "WE" instead say "I" , I don't fly caps but read comments of some people who I know fly caps pretty good, So please take some orange juice and see the good side of changes as well, Devs don't want to destroy this game as you are thinking right now they just want to make it better
~Devil

Actually no since Killer and me have expressed an opinion about this, its "WE" not "I" who are unhappy with these changes to weapon mechanics devs have made as are alot of other people.

Mindless modding of core weapon systems without even prior notice or discussion shows the autonomous nature of discovery, nothing is democratic here. Anything that seems democratic is really for show rather than anything else.

That is what I think is wrong with the mod and the route it has taken.
Reply  
Offline Alley
01-13-2016, 11:34 PM,
#28
Member
Posts: 4,524
Threads: 406
Joined: Jun 2009

(01-13-2016, 11:00 PM)Black Widow Wrote: Actually no since Killer and me have expressed an opinion about this, its "WE" not "I" who are unhappy with these changes to weapon mechanics devs have made as are alot of other people.

Mindless modding of core weapon systems without even prior notice or discussion shows the autonomous nature of discovery, nothing is democratic here. Anything that seems democratic is really for show rather than anything else.

That is what I think is wrong with the mod and the route it has taken.

d

Laz Wrote: Alley was right.
Reply  
Offline Caelumaresh
01-13-2016, 11:39 PM,
#29
Protector of Humanity
Posts: 1,603
Threads: 148
Joined: Feb 2012

(01-13-2016, 11:00 PM)Black Widow Wrote:
(01-13-2016, 03:15 AM)Devil Wrote:
(01-13-2016, 01:12 AM)Killer Wrote: Why dont you admins make a votes for the changes youre about to made,eh? Ooh,cuz you dont care what do we want! So,now gunbouts can be removed and all just get one fat ugly battleship and forgot about snubs!

I went through this thread and everyone seem happy with changes it's just you yelling around, So please don't say "WE" instead say "I" , I don't fly caps but read comments of some people who I know fly caps pretty good, So please take some orange juice and see the good side of changes as well, Devs don't want to destroy this game as you are thinking right now they just want to make it better
~Devil

stuff

Do you honestly think these changes are permanent if they work out not the way they are wanted?
They are and i cant stress it more then this: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! TESTS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Its what devs do. Stop battering into them for stuff that might or might not be permanent.

This Galaxy is vast; its wonders and beauty are almost unfathomable. But the galaxy also hides dark secrets, some of which have lain dormant since the beginning of time itself. There is a danger in secrets, both in seeking and in knowing. Some things are meant to be hidden from view. Some mysteries defy understanding, and sometimes even the things we think we know are untrue. Some secrets should remain untouched.


Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum

  Reply  
Offline Black Widow
01-13-2016, 11:58 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-14-2016, 12:03 AM by Black Widow.)
#30
Totally no longer on probation
Posts: 2,351
Threads: 230
Joined: Jun 2008

(01-13-2016, 11:34 PM)Alley Wrote:
(01-13-2016, 11:00 PM)Black Widow Wrote: Actually no since Killer and me have expressed an opinion about this, its "WE" not "I" who are unhappy with these changes to weapon mechanics devs have made as are alot of other people.

Mindless modding of core weapon systems without even prior notice or discussion shows the autonomous nature of discovery, nothing is democratic here. Anything that seems democratic is really for show rather than anything else.

That is what I think is wrong with the mod and the route it has taken.

d

how grown up of you
Reply  
Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode