• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 78 79 80 81 82 … 778 Next »
About the Flak Rework

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard
Task Force Akhetaten - 0 / 10,000
Crayter Battlegroup - 0 / 10,000
Gaian Escort - 6 / 10,000
Atum's Battlegroup - 6 / 10,000
Wendigo Seekers - 3 / 10,000
Wendigo Interdictors - 6 / 10,000
Wild Hunters - 0 / 10,000
Wild Interceptors - 1 / 10,000

Latest activity

Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3
About the Flak Rework
Offline Thyrzul
02-14-2016, 09:39 PM,
#21
The Council
Posts: 4,684
Threads: 115
Joined: Sep 2011

Is it just me misinterpreting your stuff or you really think all the flaks done their damage pre-rework? Spazzy's thread was to point out how out of all the flak projectiles in a salvo only one did damage to the target, the rest got blown up before reaching their destination. To sum it up, increased missile health is to ensure the first one won't blow up the rest, increased mass is to ensure the first one won't blow away the rest, decreased damage dealth by each missile is to mitigate the otherwise vastly increased damage output given all the flaks do their damage now. Currently you can deal the same damage with 2 flaks as you could with 3, 4, 6 flaks in the previous system, sounds like a buff to me, especially for caps with low amount of secondary turret hardpoints.

[Image: OFPpYpb.png][Image: N1Zf8K4.png][Image: LnLbhul.png]
Reply  
Offline Titan*
02-14-2016, 10:11 PM,
#22
Developer
Posts: 1,075
Threads: 88
Joined: Jul 2013

Poor Battlecruisers really easy target for novas now because of flak energy usage
Reply  
Offline Thunderer
02-14-2016, 10:50 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-14-2016, 10:51 PM by Thunderer.)
#23
Tea Disposal Unit
Posts: 5,613
Threads: 463
Joined: Jul 2011

@Thyrzul, it does sound like a buff, but it is in fact a cloaked heavy nerf. That is what I am trying to point out here. Spazzy's setup didn't work because it was set up in a wrong way. The 3 flaks on my Valor and my Redemption would almost always do damage when they exploded, all of them, because they are placed on the right hardpoints. The same goes for the 4 flaks of the shared BAF| carrier and the 2 flaks on each of the other battleships I have access to.

This is why I prefer Wesker dealing with cap development, instead of the founder of the Rogue Torpedoes Squad.

[Image: 396AUfe.png]
Bretonian Treaty Database Bretonian Armed Forces Recruitment Center
Bretonian Charter of Interstellar Law Bretonian Secrets Act
Reply  
Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode