• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 75 76 77 78 79 … 547 Next »
Omegas Rework Poll - Omega-9

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: What to do with Omega-9? (read the post!)
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Option A: Switch
26.87%
18 26.87%
Option B: Merge
52.24%
35 52.24%
Option C: Keep
10.45%
7 10.45%
Option D: Recommend
2.99%
2 2.99%
I don't know
0%
0 0%
I don't care
7.46%
5 7.46%
Total 67 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Thread Closed 
Omegas Rework Poll - Omega-9
Offline Operator
02-22-2016, 04:37 PM,
#21
Member
Posts: 1,068
Threads: 60
Joined: Apr 2015

Uhn... I think they should return O11-O5 JH back.
 
Offline Teerin
02-24-2016, 11:01 PM,
#22
Member
Posts: 898
Threads: 102
Joined: Apr 2012

I like the amount of voting that has gone on so far, as well as the discussion. This thread will remain open until (at the very least) the end of this coming weekend. If you have not already read this and cast your opinion, please do so.

Related; I'd really appreciate it if people would stop voting with alt or faction accounts. Not only is it poor form, but it's also going to backfire on you since I'm a moderator and know exactly who is who. Have some integrity, folks.
Offline Durandal
02-24-2016, 11:51 PM,
#23
Member
Posts: 5,106
Threads: 264
Joined: Apr 2009

I originally wanted to keep things the way things were (option C) as I did not want to move Cadiz further away from Bretonia, giving the Corsairs an even longer raid time.

The popular vote however has clearly come down to switching the system's position or merging it with another one, and frankly I believe a merge would be a massive mistake as you're going to run into the following issues:

- Economy.

This is a big one even though I'm sure many of you don't care. Omega 9 was originally added by @AeternusDoleo due to trade issues, and it would make a lot of routes far too quick if it were to disappear.

- Cramping.

I'm surprised the IMG voted to have the systems merged when they're familiar with the nightmare that is Tau 23. Omega 5 has quite enough going on as is without adding even more jumpholes to it. Useful systems are good. Complete regional dominance of activity by a single system is bad.

- Expansion.

This is probably the biggest personal issue I have with removing the system. Discovery has a serious lack of 'wilderness' systems so to speak. Omega 9 currently offers a unique environment seen probably nowhere else with the exception of Omicron Lost in that it allows players to set up bases and have fights without any interference by NPCs. This is huge and very important, and I'd ideally like to see one system like this per borderworld region (One Sigma, one Tau, one Omega, one Omicron).

So I'm voting for a switch, and I'd urge anyone who didn't to consider these issues, as they might just change your mind.
Offline Lythrilux
02-24-2016, 11:55 PM,
#24
Edgy Worlds
Posts: 10,361
Threads: 737
Joined: Jan 2013

(02-24-2016, 11:51 PM)Durandal Wrote: - Expansion.

This is probably the biggest personal issue I have with removing the system. Discovery has a serious lack of 'wilderness' systems so to speak. Omega 9 currently offers a unique environment seen probably nowhere else with the exception of Omicron Lost in that it allows players to set up bases and have fights without any interference by NPCs. This is huge and very important, and I'd ideally like to see one system like this per borderworld region (One Sigma, one Tau, one Omega, one Omicron).

This doesn't really mean anything if players don't go there often enough though. Lost draws players in because of it's atmosphere and lore. Omega-9 offers nothing whatsoever - not even interesting infocards.

[Image: Lythrilux.gif]
Offline Vito
02-24-2016, 11:56 PM,
#25
Member
Posts: 988
Threads: 30
Joined: Mar 2010

Option C doesn't mean "keep things as they are", it means "keep plans as they are" which in turn, means removing the Omega 5 - Omega 41 link and other stuff Teerin wrote in the opening post.

The Corsair Trade Company

Information | Feedback | Communication Center | Recruitment
 
Offline Durandal
02-24-2016, 11:57 PM,
#26
Member
Posts: 5,106
Threads: 264
Joined: Apr 2009

(02-24-2016, 11:55 PM)Lythrilux Wrote:
(02-24-2016, 11:51 PM)Durandal Wrote: - Expansion.

This is probably the biggest personal issue I have with removing the system. Discovery has a serious lack of 'wilderness' systems so to speak. Omega 9 currently offers a unique environment seen probably nowhere else with the exception of Omicron Lost in that it allows players to set up bases and have fights without any interference by NPCs. This is huge and very important, and I'd ideally like to see one system like this per borderworld region (One Sigma, one Tau, one Omega, one Omicron).

This doesn't really mean anything if players don't go there often enough though. Lost draws players in because of it's atmosphere and lore. Omega-9 offers nothing whatsoever - not even interesting infocards.

Tell that to the multitude of silent powertraders who use it because it doesn't have loads of scary Hessians and Corsairs.

Anyway I think that's a matter of personal opinion. I hate the radial symmetry of the system myself, but the emptiness of the whole thing is very nice.

(02-24-2016, 11:56 PM)Vito Wrote: Option C doesn't mean "keep things as they are", it means "keep plans as they are" which in turn, means removing the Omega 5 - Omega 41 link and other stuff Teerin wrote in the opening post.

...Which currently involve keeping Omega 9 right where it is, in addition to the removed links, etc.
Offline Clavius
02-25-2016, 03:58 AM,
#27
Member
Posts: 538
Threads: 65
Joined: Aug 2009

From a players point of view, an empty system just for fights and events would be great, however, avarege number of players is just too low for that right now.
Currently, in my opinion, we should cut down the number of systems to increase the chances of interaction.
Losing time travelling through empty systems to get to interaction is something that shouldn't be ignored.

Second thing is that option A isn't viable for the Corsairs. We had o41-o5 connection since vanilla and we would hate to see it severed.
Omega 5 is very important for our activity since it hosts battles almost on a daily basis, whether it is BAF, RHA, SCRA or some loco trader trying to escape through the minefield.

Therefore, option B, in my humble opinion, is the best option for Omega activity and Corsairs.
Offline SnakeLancerHaven
02-25-2016, 04:03 AM,
#28
Volgograd Industrial
Posts: 2,873
Threads: 238
Joined: Feb 2012

Yah, that system was an annoyance tbh lol. Omega-9 always seemed like a hinderance, so I'd say merge (B).

[Image: ?key=dc385ef2304f0cab6f94da42bc2ff703cf5...5BS0UucG5n]
R.I.P Tabris...
Youtube - Twitch - My old Account
 
Offline Teerin
02-25-2016, 04:16 AM,
#29
Member
Posts: 898
Threads: 102
Joined: Apr 2012

(02-25-2016, 03:58 AM)Clavius Wrote: Currently, in my opinion, we should cut down the number of systems to increase the chances of interaction.

Considering that approximately two dozen systems will have been removed between 4.87 Initial and 4.88 Final, a few extra like Omega-9, Omicron Lost, and Kansas aren't really problematic.

Quote:Second thing is that option A isn't viable for the Corsairs. We had o41-o5 connection since vanilla and we would hate to see it severed.

You are mistaken; Option A (unlike Option C, the current plans) keeps the Omega-41 connection to Omega-5
Offline Clavius
02-25-2016, 04:37 AM,
#30
Member
Posts: 538
Threads: 65
Joined: Aug 2009

(02-25-2016, 04:16 AM)Teerin Wrote: You are mistaken; Option A (unlike Option C, the current plans) keeps the Omega-41 connection to Omega-5

Omega 9 is still an issue though

Note to self: Don't respond on threads except flood at 4am Big Grin
Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Thread Closed 


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode