• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 39 40 41 42 43 … 547 Next »
Carriers idea

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Carriers idea
Offline TheShooter36
06-19-2018, 07:45 PM,
#21
Guardian of Oaths
Posts: 1,970
Threads: 228
Joined: Jul 2014

IMO carriers should be hulking command ships, like EVE carriers. EVen bigger than Dreadnoughts, even more tankier, but reduce their firepower to only 2 Primaries and the drone. Also give each carrier 16-24 secondary.

Reply  
Offline Isha
06-19-2018, 08:36 PM, (This post was last modified: 06-19-2018, 08:39 PM by Isha.)
#22
Member
Posts: 70
Threads: 5
Joined: Apr 2018

(06-19-2018, 07:45 PM)TheShooter36 Wrote: IMO carriers should be hulking command ships, like EVE carriers. EVen bigger than Dreadnoughts, even more tankier, but reduce their firepower to only 2 Primaries and the drone. Also give each carrier 16-24 secondary.

+1ing intensifies

(06-15-2018, 01:36 PM)sasapinjic Wrote: Carriers should have Only Secondary Weapons for defensive purpose and maybe missile launchers for Support role , without any other Heavy and Primary weapons .

Dis too. Carriers and heavies don't match too much.

[Image: yZ3ppEt.png]
Reply  
Offline Mr.Mike.
06-21-2018, 11:00 AM, (This post was last modified: 06-21-2018, 11:00 AM by Mr.Mike..)
#23
Member
Posts: 488
Threads: 37
Joined: Nov 2016

Bump!

Administration, devs - waiting for your answers.


6th Liberty Navy Fleet || BDM|

[Image: c1MhYs-KBQo.jpg]
[+]Collection of my great phrases and citations

"Don't blame the person, he didn't do. You act like a pig."


Reply  
Offline Greylock
06-21-2018, 12:28 PM,
#24
Buttcloaker Extraordinaire
Posts: 738
Threads: 72
Joined: Mar 2018

Now, I'm sure that someone has pointed this out and I missed it, but I will say it again: The number of drones you are suggesting would lag the server to hell in no time. Now, I will grant you that having more than one drone per carrier would make more sense, but I can see how if a bunch of people were to have drones out at the same time, the server would lag extremely bad.

[Image: dqsrBM1.png]
Reply  
Offline Mr.Mike.
06-22-2018, 04:12 AM,
#25
Member
Posts: 488
Threads: 37
Joined: Nov 2016

(06-21-2018, 12:28 PM)Greylock97 Wrote: Now, I'm sure that someone has pointed this out and I missed it, but I will say it again: The number of drones you are suggesting would lag the server to hell in no time. Now, I will grant you that having more than one drone per carrier would make more sense, but I can see how if a bunch of people were to have drones out at the same time, the server would lag extremely bad.

I'm not sure that the administration will ask about lags when it reads it. A vivid example of their inattention to the server is how many cultists/nomads they spawn.

But we moved away from the topic. Now carriers have the characteristics of a battleship. So, this class of ships must be removed, well, or transferred to the class of battleships. The third option is my idea with carriers.


6th Liberty Navy Fleet || BDM|

[Image: c1MhYs-KBQo.jpg]
[+]Collection of my great phrases and citations

"Don't blame the person, he didn't do. You act like a pig."


Reply  
Offline DarkTails
06-22-2018, 05:38 AM,
#26
Goddess of Boop
Posts: 1,775
Threads: 115
Joined: Aug 2016

Battleships and carriers are very different classes. The drone usage is in its infancy and the Liberty carrier is the test bed. It was stripped of its heavies and put down to prims and secondaries, in exchange for the drone bay. Should the usage of drones be successful I image all current carriers will lose their heavy spots for drones.

No one can out boop me, not even an Admin!
Boop. ~Spuddo
GRAVE REPERCUSSIONS ~Ramke
Get booped on, nerd. ~Durandal
I wanted to be a part of the party, hi Tails. ~Inferno
Pokes are superior boops. ~Naz
Get patted, dork. ~Peti
Reply  
Offline Mr.Mike.
06-22-2018, 05:43 AM,
#27
Member
Posts: 488
Threads: 37
Joined: Nov 2016

(06-22-2018, 05:38 AM)DarkTails Wrote: Battleships and carriers are very different classes. The drone usage is in its infancy and the Liberty carrier is the test bed. It was stripped of its heavies and put down to prims and secondaries, in exchange for the drone bay. Should the usage of drones be successful I image all current carriers will lose their heavy spots for drones.

Omg, who cares about heavy turrets? You on a carrier in a reality saw 300-mm guns of a battleship? Me not.

You have to understand that it's not just about weapons, but also about the hull strength, the number of guns, their damage and so on.


6th Liberty Navy Fleet || BDM|

[Image: c1MhYs-KBQo.jpg]
[+]Collection of my great phrases and citations

"Don't blame the person, he didn't do. You act like a pig."


Reply  
Offline DarkTails
06-22-2018, 05:56 AM,
#28
Goddess of Boop
Posts: 1,775
Threads: 115
Joined: Aug 2016

Heavy turrets make all the difference in a battle. They share primary and secondary weapons and similar stats because they're among the heaviest warships in their fleets. Carriers are typically command or flagships, of course they'll be heavily armed and armored. This isn't like ocean naval warfare, this is space. In terms of survivability, aircraft carriers were BETTER protected than battleships, armed with a plethora of AA artillery and automatic AA guns. Protective equipment and highly effective damage control. If it was based on this, carrier hull stats would far exceed that of a battleship. Carriers are the flagships, the quarterback of the football team. They will have the most armor because that's where the Admiral hoists his flag.

No one can out boop me, not even an Admin!
Boop. ~Spuddo
GRAVE REPERCUSSIONS ~Ramke
Get booped on, nerd. ~Durandal
I wanted to be a part of the party, hi Tails. ~Inferno
Pokes are superior boops. ~Naz
Get patted, dork. ~Peti
Reply  
Offline Mr.Mike.
06-22-2018, 06:04 AM,
#29
Member
Posts: 488
Threads: 37
Joined: Nov 2016

(06-22-2018, 05:56 AM)DarkTails Wrote: Heavy turrets make all the difference in a battle. They share primary and secondary weapons and similar stats because they're among the heaviest warships in their fleets. Carriers are typically command or flagships, of course they'll be heavily armed and armored. This isn't like ocean naval warfare, this is space. In terms of survivability, aircraft carriers were BETTER protected than battleships, armed with a plethora of AA artillery and automatic AA guns. Protective equipment and highly effective damage control. If it was based on this, carrier hull stats would far exceed that of a battleship. Carriers are the flagships, the quarterback of the football team. They will have the most armor because that's where the Admiral hoists his flag.

Then transfer the ship to the battleships, what's the problem?

As for heavy turrets - I had quite another in mind.

As for the level of battle - look at other games, there carriers do not have so heavy weapons and armor. Nevertheless, they MUCH more battleship, which makes them an easy target.

If there carriers are so powerful and so on, what prevents to increase the size so that everything looks logical? If it's a flagship, why is it so small? If it is a flagship, then it must be one and unique, and not sold for every second player.

But we moved away from the topic: why did Atlantis get the name "carrier" if it has the characteristics of a battleship? Can it be much easier to weaken these characteristics? Or maybe just transfer the ship to the battleships?


6th Liberty Navy Fleet || BDM|

[Image: c1MhYs-KBQo.jpg]
[+]Collection of my great phrases and citations

"Don't blame the person, he didn't do. You act like a pig."


Reply  
Offline DarkTails
06-22-2018, 06:24 AM,
#30
Goddess of Boop
Posts: 1,775
Threads: 115
Joined: Aug 2016

Flagships aren't meant to stick out. Their only unique quality is housing the fleet commander/admiral. Carriers are support ships that are not meant to be sitting on the front duking it with battleships. Carriers are from the days when 200 slots wasn't enough for Discos player base and firmly exist inside disco. The recent changes are aiming to make them unique, more carrier like since docking modules are broken. Before they were literally just bigger battleships. The changes being tested are to make them their own class. Merging them with the existing class would serve no purpose and at that point carriers would just be deleted outright.

No one can out boop me, not even an Admin!
Boop. ~Spuddo
GRAVE REPERCUSSIONS ~Ramke
Get booped on, nerd. ~Durandal
I wanted to be a part of the party, hi Tails. ~Inferno
Pokes are superior boops. ~Naz
Get patted, dork. ~Peti
Reply  
Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode