• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Rules
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 198 Next »
Please consider moving or changing IFF of POB

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Please consider moving or changing IFF of POB
Offline Kazinsal
03-10-2020, 03:28 AM,
#21
Wizard
Posts: 4,541
Threads: 230
Joined: Sep 2009

(03-10-2020, 02:49 AM)Victor Steiner Wrote: Yes and no, it's a location code with no references. So it's trial and error for moving something, really precise movements are difficult to implement.

The command you're looking for is /pos.

I maintain that "technical problems" with requests have overwhelmingly been non-problems for the better part of a decade.

Code:
    /** Print current position */
    bool MiscCmds::UserCmd_Pos(uint iClientID, const wstring &wscCmd, const wstring &wscParam, const wchar_t *usage)
    {
        HKPLAYERINFO p;
        if (HkGetPlayerInfo((const wchar_t*) Players.GetActiveCharacterName(iClientID), p, false)!=HKE_OK || p.iShip==0)
        {
            PrintUserCmdText(iClientID, L"ERR Not in space");
            return true;
        }

        Vector pos;
        Matrix rot;
        pub::SpaceObj::GetLocation(p.iShip, pos, rot);

        Vector erot = MatrixToEuler(rot);

        wchar_t buf[100];
        _snwprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), L"Position %0.0f %0.0f %0.0f Orient %0.0f %0.0f %0.0f",
            pos.x, pos.y, pos.z, erot.x, erot.y, erot.z);
        PrintUserCmdText(iClientID, buf);
        return true;
    }

Retired, permanently.
Reply  
Offline Grumblesaur
03-10-2020, 05:42 AM, (This post was last modified: 03-10-2020, 05:59 AM by Grumblesaur.)
#22
Fleet Tender
Posts: 2,742
Threads: 56
Joined: Sep 2008

(03-10-2020, 02:07 AM)Saronsen Wrote:
(03-10-2020, 02:03 AM)Grumblesaur Wrote: Says the guy who just got sanctioned. Maybe you could just stop breaking rules?
edit
[Image: mZPX5VH.png]

You engaged my contribution by calling it cancer. I'm just throwing stones through the already-broken window.

Besides, breaking server rules undermines your no-more-rules position per se -- all I'm doing is pointing it out.

That is to say, your argument is invalid because you have a vested interest in redacting or subverting the rules. Furthermore,


even if it was a fallacy, that doesn't mean my initial post was logically incorrect.

A way a lone a last a loved a long the riverrun, past Eve and Adam's, from swerve of shore to bend of bay,
brings us by a commodius vicus of recirculation back to Howth Castle and Environs.
Reply  
Offline Typrop
03-10-2020, 06:44 AM,
#23
Emperor's Wrath
Posts: 422
Threads: 25
Joined: Sep 2016

(03-10-2020, 05:42 AM)Grumblesaur Wrote: You engaged my contribution by calling it cancer. I'm just throwing stones through the already-broken window.

Besides, breaking server rules undermines your no-more-rules position per se -- all I'm doing is pointing it out.

That is to say, your argument is invalid because you have a vested interest in redacting or subverting the rules. Furthermore,


even if it was a fallacy, that doesn't mean my initial post was logically incorrect.

He called the concept of sanctionlancer cancerous. Your entire response to him is predicated on an attack on his character in order to invalidate his argument, which, does not fall under the "fallacy fallacy." Attacking his character, for being sanctioned several times - therefore supposedly invalidating his argument - is an ad hominem, and forms the backbone of your response to him. This is what we like to call a "non-argument." It is also very poorly thought out, given the fact that pretty much every user in this thread has been sanctioned at one point or another, barring a few select examples.

Try demonstrating why simply moving bases is not preferable to creating a greater sanction-load than there already is, if you are actually trying to convince people of something, instead of arguing against people you don't like for the sake of not liking them.

If you cannot take having something you say be called nonviable, regardless of syntax, then you might want to consider not "contributing" in an open forum.

User was banned for: They will know.
Time left: (Permanent)
  Reply  
Offline Jayce
03-10-2020, 07:45 AM, (This post was last modified: 03-10-2020, 07:45 AM by Jayce.)
#24
Heads Will Roll
Posts: 2,167
Threads: 141
Joined: Nov 2008

Long Island Station will have a Rogue IFF shortly. Gonna' happen. Promise.

[Image: jKk7NOg.png][Image: 1iGGFXz.gif]
Reply  
Offline Skorak
03-10-2020, 09:37 AM,
#25
3x Custom User Title
Posts: 4,422
Threads: 503
Joined: Mar 2008

(03-10-2020, 02:30 AM)Victor Steiner Wrote: Perhaps if the original owners actually took the time to think about what they were doing, we wouldn't have this issue.

Moving a base because someone didn't think it through, or didn't care to is not the dev's fault. Moving a base is a lot of hard work for little gain. That's why it's done so infrequently. Perhaps next time PoB owners will take that into consideration before actually building a base in a stupid location.

And it's not far, at all, to give someone a base and then turn around with a ''jokes on you, you have to move it now Big Grin''. That's most unfair and I don't have any sympathy for Libgov getting warned over that. Seems like an ''old boys'' club. ''You're not one of us so you can't have nice things''.

Tough less than five minutes.

[Image: 4M4UTts.png]
[Image: IDgpvpG.png][Image: T5nJFSb.png] [Image: R2wbzfN.png] [Image: dAW1eot.png111] [Image: R2wbzfN.png] [Image: OECngVP.png77] [Image: R2wbzfN.png] [Image: 7ODm3kk.png33] [Image: R2wbzfN.png] [Image: RKgpLfI.png88]
Reply  
Offline Lucas
03-10-2020, 09:53 AM,
#26
BaRyCeNtEr
Posts: 1,165
Threads: 99
Joined: Oct 2017

Or we Just delete pobs!!!!
Reply  
Offline Thyrzul
03-10-2020, 10:09 AM,
#27
The Council
Posts: 4,684
Threads: 115
Joined: Sep 2011

(03-10-2020, 02:30 AM)Victor Steiner Wrote: Perhaps if the original owners actually took the time to think about what they were doing, we wouldn't have this issue.

Moving a base because someone didn't think it through, or didn't care to is not the dev's fault. Moving a base is a lot of hard work for little gain. That's why it's done so infrequently. Perhaps next time PoB owners will take that into consideration before actually building a base in a stupid location.

And it's not far, at all, to give someone a base and then turn around with a ''jokes on you, you have to move it now Big Grin''. That's most unfair and I don't have any sympathy for Libgov getting warned over that. Seems like an ''old boys'' club. ''You're not one of us so you can't have nice things''.

It's always amusing to see people going clever without checking facts first.

[Image: OFPpYpb.png][Image: N1Zf8K4.png][Image: LnLbhul.png]
Reply  
Offline SnakThree
03-10-2020, 10:16 AM,
#28
Member
Posts: 9,091
Threads: 337
Joined: Mar 2010

(03-10-2020, 02:30 AM)Victor Steiner Wrote: Perhaps if the original owners actually took the time to think about what they were doing, we wouldn't have this issue.

Moving a base because someone didn't think it through, or didn't care to is not the dev's fault. Moving a base is a lot of hard work for little gain. That's why it's done so infrequently. Perhaps next time PoB owners will take that into consideration before actually building a base in a stupid location.

And it's not far, at all, to give someone a base and then turn around with a ''jokes on you, you have to move it now Big Grin''. That's most unfair and I don't have any sympathy for Libgov getting warned over that. Seems like an ''old boys'' club. ''You're not one of us so you can't have nice things''.

You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about as you are absolutely uninformed about situation that you are absolutely wrong about.

The POB in question has changed ownership from member of 5th| to mercenaries. After the ownership changed, it was decided to kindly ask the base to be moved 5k away. This is absolutely fair and absolutely reasonable.

Moving POB takes a minute or two. Not warning someone over for legit roleplay requires even less effort.

In general, refusal to move POBs after there was precedence seems to be far worse than doing RP and asking someone to move POB when situation changes.

[Image: rTrJole.png][Image: LJ88XSk.png]
[Image: ka0AQa5.png][Image: QwWqCS8.png]
  Reply  
Offline Petitioner
03-10-2020, 11:14 AM,
#29
a e s t h e t i c
Posts: 3,369
Threads: 294
Joined: Dec 2009
Staff roles:
Server Administrator

just get rid of rules about bases and let them be a wild west, like they were when they were very very first implemented
no more attack declarations, no more IFF restrictions, no more core restrictions, slap a pricetag on move requests, ez pz

[Image: gamer5000.gif]

Recruitment | Task Force Prometheus | ICN FIRESTORM
  Reply  
Offline Victor Steiner
03-10-2020, 02:11 PM,
#30
Member
Posts: 1,836
Threads: 124
Joined: Oct 2016

Snac, if Libgov had told 5th or whoever originally built the thing to keep 5K distance, you wouldn't have this issue would you?

[Image: K21Vaai.png]
Reply  
Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode