• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Rules Faction Rules Faction Review and Feedback Archived Feedback Threads
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
AGS- feedback

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (8): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 8 Next »
AGS- feedback
Offline Jansen
04-27-2011, 05:26 PM,
#21
Member
Posts: 4,110
Threads: 501
Joined: Jan 2009

It would be good to have some more feedback on how we are doing, yes it can even be positive if you cant resist.

[Image: HkdyBql.gif]
Reply  
Offline koske
09-11-2011, 04:54 PM,
#22
Member
Posts: 523
Threads: 57
Joined: Nov 2009

Well I really don't have good things to say about your group, shooting on people 3v1 and also standing targets when you are losing really hard in the fight.
  Reply  
Offline Backo
09-11-2011, 05:10 PM,
#23
Basilica Combat Patrol
Posts: 3,594
Threads: 123
Joined: Feb 2009

' Wrote:Well I really don't have good things to say about your group, shooting on people 3v1 and also standing targets when you are losing really hard in the fight.

Please enlighten us more on the specific case(s)?

P.S. If you don't want to explain further, we'd freely assume you're just angry about a lost fight and want to throw mud at our name, so please do prove us wrong!

Republic of the Sword and Sun
  Reply  
Offline koske
09-12-2011, 12:25 PM,
#24
Member
Posts: 523
Threads: 57
Joined: Nov 2009

Quote:P.S. If you don't want to explain further, we'd freely assume you're just angry about a lost fight and want to throw mud at our name, so please do prove us wrong!

You have good point but it is not enough, I'm sure you know what you done yesterday with three more ship because you were ordering that and it is obvious 0.0 rule don't exist for you.

Quote:5.2 All attacks
That means "ALL", but you fail to say anything and I'm sure that this was not accidentally. Hitting someone with razor then snack is instant kill.
  Reply  
Offline Backo
09-12-2011, 12:39 PM,
#25
Basilica Combat Patrol
Posts: 3,594
Threads: 123
Joined: Feb 2009

' Wrote:You have good point but it is not enough, I'm sure you know what you done yesterday with three more ship because you were ordering that and it is obvious 0.0 rule don't exist for you.


That means "ALL", but you fail to say anything and I'm sure that this was not accidentally. Hitting someone with razor then snack is instant kill.

Funny thing, really. Because I recall 2 ships. AGS-U|Banshee and AGS-U|Grossier.Bumms. There was no other AGS in yesterday's fight next to Westfalen.

As for the attacks, I believe we did our engaging RP, everyone knew we were there and picking on stray targets. As for being on the losing side, wanna hear something interesting? We're not taking sides, we don't side with Rheinland Military, nor do we side with Liberty Navy, we just kill the one who has the advantage over the other so when it gets balanced both sides suffer as much casualties as possible. That's the RP in such fights that I've promoted, that's the RP most if not all AGS-U follow around Hamburg/Bering/Hudson/Texas.

As for rule 0.0, interesting call. I remember the same =LSF=Anna.Brown feeding nanos off the first Liberty Navy Gunboat that entered Bering in a fight not even a week ago. Remember that one? When you were outnumbering us, but you felt it was needed to call two battleships on us as well. Oh right, that was the only kill you scored, via double battleship missile. Also feel free to remember the starting odds of that =LSF=/AGS-U fight in Bering as well.

Fail to say anything? So you mean next time you want us to say who we'll target? We were in that engagement for long before =LSF= arrived, we shot down a lot other ships before your guy got double tap'd.

Oh and you'll come to realise that we don't have as many big capital ships as Liberty nor Rheinland, so we're not exactly the ones to jump in a big Hamburg brawl and fight everyone directly.

Republic of the Sword and Sun
  Reply  
Offline koske
09-12-2011, 12:44 PM, (This post was last modified: 09-12-2011, 12:45 PM by koske.)
#26
Member
Posts: 523
Threads: 57
Joined: Nov 2009

Quote:Remember that one?

Well I sure can remember that one, but I don't know if you can remember shooting same Anna in Texas with three ships long before Bering fight? Maybe you were not there I can't remember now, but your folks sure did that thing.
  Reply  
Offline Backo
09-12-2011, 12:47 PM,
#27
Basilica Combat Patrol
Posts: 3,594
Threads: 123
Joined: Feb 2009

' Wrote:Well I sure can remember that one, but I don't know if you can remember shooting same Anna in Texas with three ships long before Bering fight? Maybe you were not there I can't remember now, but your folks sure did that thing.

That's new. Exactly before said Bering fight or?

Because when the Bering fight happened we were retreating from Hamburg to Bering and then trying to remove those two hunters you jumped in to save.

Republic of the Sword and Sun
  Reply  
Offline koske
09-12-2011, 12:56 PM, (This post was last modified: 09-12-2011, 12:57 PM by koske.)
#28
Member
Posts: 523
Threads: 57
Joined: Nov 2009

It's about a month or two, your folks just jumped me for blue messages I suppose without fair fight so maybe my charge with nanos is justified? But also remember that I blew myself with mines and 54 nanobots left in my ship for very good reason.

Ahhh and now about those hunters, you had three ships shooting on two of them. One was badly damaged and I told just two of my pilots to assist in the fight, as we are speaking I didn't jump with them just to keep fair fight going. After several minutes more of your guys come and then I assisted in the fight.
  Reply  
Offline Backo
09-12-2011, 01:06 PM,
#29
Basilica Combat Patrol
Posts: 3,594
Threads: 123
Joined: Feb 2009

' Wrote:It's about a month or two, your folks just jumped me for blue messages I suppose without fair fight so maybe my charge with nanos is justified? But also remember that I blew myself with mines and 54 nanobots left in my ship for very good reason.

Ahhh and now about those hunters, you had three ships shooting on two of them. One was badly damaged and I told just two of my pilots to assist in the fight, as we are speaking I didn't jump with them just to keep fair fight going. After several minutes more of your guys come and then I assisted in the fight.

A month or two back. That's pretty much when I picked up AGS-U, a month back. So maybe I'm not aware of that one, for which I apologize. If we really did that, we're sorry.

As for the hunters. It was 2 hunter VHFs versus 2 AGS-U VHFs and an AGS-U bomber. At the sight of =LSF=, I (the one in the bomber) quickly ran back for Pacifica. I'm sure you're aware what so many fighters do to a bomber. And yes, I do recall you staying back until I returned with a fighter. But that doesn't change that the fight was 4v2, in your odds. The moment I arrived back it was 5v3. Now I'm not saying you staying back wasn't appreciated, but you were still outnumbering our forces 2 to 1.

After which it became a game of cat and mouse where both sides kept pouring extra players. For which I got to kudos you, you managed to get 5 of us online. It was a first in quite some time.

As for the nuke death, I think you blew yourself while fighting. Which felt more of an instant kill then a voluntary give up from your side. Though that's just how it looked from our side.

Republic of the Sword and Sun
  Reply  
Offline koske
09-12-2011, 01:30 PM,
#30
Member
Posts: 523
Threads: 57
Joined: Nov 2009

Personally I had enough of fight that was out of balance and started mine spam.

Quote:I'm not aware of that one, for which I apologize. If we really did that, we're sorry.

Maybe its my fault because I didn't talk about it and I appreciate your apology. After this I shall watch more towards the future. I will try to work on our relations but only if you do the same thing for me and then we can forget about this misunderstanding.

Also we are sorry for that incident in Bering but that reaction was followed by the previous.
  Reply  
Pages (8): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 8 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode