Because it ended buried under other issues, reposting it again.
(02-11-2016, 12:00 PM)Laura C. Wrote: Hi, I would like to ask if the activity check for January was made according to old activity rules and requirements (5 active members required, hardship program still applied and so on) or according to new ones (3 active members required, hardship program no longer exist etc.).
My feedback to you admins about the player banned 30 days is as follow:-
WELL DONE!
Thank you for keeping our community racists free
Please continue your great work and don't be stopped by any negativity
You are awesome team.
Is it just me or does this seem like a repost? I thought the admins might try to tweak the system in response to some complaints. If you want suggestions and what other leaders think, check out this survey I did several months ago.
Could you please tell me why this thread is systematicly ignored? Especially because new sanctions have been processed and replied to, while our wasn't even after several bumps.
An answer would be nice