• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Developers Forum
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Systems Update Feedback: Independent Worlds

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (14): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 14 Next »
Systems Update Feedback: Independent Worlds
Offline moebus
03-01-2015, 05:29 PM,
#31
Member
Posts: 1,086
Threads: 76
Joined: Feb 2010

It's nice to have a lot of systems compared with vanilla, it makes discovery very attractive.
But at the same time, it dilutes the activity. Considering the current number of players on the server I think we should keep on reducing the number of systems.


»»» The Seraphim Info Page »»» Recruitment »»» Missions and Reports »»»

Reply  
Offline Sylvie557
03-01-2015, 05:31 PM, (This post was last modified: 03-01-2015, 05:32 PM by Sylvie557.)
#32
Could use a hand
Posts: 878
Threads: 73
Joined: Apr 2011

(03-01-2015, 05:01 PM)Captain_Nemo Wrote:
(03-01-2015, 07:14 AM)Echo 7-7 Wrote: Humboldt - Removed. Fortaleza Base moved to Kansas. Ore fields moved to Vespucci.

QQ's, Can we keep the name Humboldt and remove Kansas?

But Kansas is an amazing system... Humboldt is kinda boring honestly >.>

|| Aoi Iseijin |Aoi || Junker Marauders JM|- || MEMES- ||
[Image: NlHBsye.png]
Reply  
Offline Stoner_Steve
03-01-2015, 05:37 PM,
#33
Master of Arms
Posts: 2,551
Threads: 339
Joined: Jan 2014

(03-01-2015, 05:31 PM)Loki557 Wrote:
(03-01-2015, 05:01 PM)Captain_Nemo Wrote:
(03-01-2015, 07:14 AM)Echo 7-7 Wrote: Humboldt - Removed. Fortaleza Base moved to Kansas. Ore fields moved to Vespucci.

QQ's, Can we keep the name Humboldt and remove Kansas?

But Kansas is an amazing system... Humboldt is kinda boring honestly >.>

Humboldt, with two ore fields, pirates, and a base (both player and NPC), vs Kansas, a desolate, empty, worthless system, with a jump-gate to an alien system
Reply  
Offline Sylvie557
03-01-2015, 05:41 PM,
#34
Could use a hand
Posts: 878
Threads: 73
Joined: Apr 2011

But kansas is soooo cool, plus the stuff is coming to Kansas(well at least the base although I think the ore field as well) but Humboldt just seems bland to me.

|| Aoi Iseijin |Aoi || Junker Marauders JM|- || MEMES- ||
[Image: NlHBsye.png]
Reply  
Offline Stoner_Steve
03-01-2015, 05:45 PM,
#35
Master of Arms
Posts: 2,551
Threads: 339
Joined: Jan 2014

(03-01-2015, 05:41 PM)Loki557 Wrote: But kansas is soooo cool, plus the stuff is coming to Kansas(well at least the base although I think the ore field as well) but Humboldt just seems bland to me.

(03-01-2015, 07:14 AM)Echo 7-7 Wrote: Humboldt - Removed. Fortaleza Base moved to Kansas. Ore fields moved to Vespucci.

At any rate, I asked if the name could be kept at the very least
Reply  
Offline Teerin
03-01-2015, 06:28 PM,
#36
Member
Posts: 898
Threads: 102
Joined: Apr 2012

For those complaining about Gallia not shrinking; fear not.

Also note that changes in the rest of Sirius are not yet complete, and a few more are soon to disappear. Illinois, for example, is getting removed. Plus some Taus, possibly a Rheinland or two, etc.

The only thing I haven't seen any news about are the Hispanic systems. I'll go poke around
Reply  
Offline Ichiru
03-01-2015, 10:12 PM,
#37
Librelancer, LancerEdit
Posts: 811
Threads: 80
Joined: Oct 2011
Staff roles: Coding Dev

(03-01-2015, 12:01 PM)Zayne Carrick Wrote:
Quote:Sigma-15 - Formerly Luneburg. No longer a Guard system.
Stop reducing Red Hessian ZoI even further!

Other than that-fine.

Ehm.. don't know what you're on about there. Luneburg is definitely not Hessian ZoI.

Acolyte of NoMe
  Reply  
Offline Sarawr!?
03-01-2015, 10:56 PM, (This post was last modified: 03-01-2015, 11:01 PM by Sarawr!?.)
#38
THE LAWH
Posts: 2,311
Threads: 117
Joined: Oct 2008

(03-01-2015, 01:08 PM)SpaceTime Wrote: So let me get this right.
The home system of a non-vanilla (unlawful-revolutionary) faction gets mining fields and becomes the shortcut of at least 1/3 of the game's trade routes.
...Why?
Lore in Discovery is not bound to Vanilla Freelancer, neither should it be, opening up the guard system of a faction like the Hellfire Legion serves to make them better included in the mod, and I see nothing wrong with that.

So many factions in Discovery exist that did not exist in "Vanilla Freelancer", so many factions exist in Discovery that exist in a WAAAAAAAAAY different way now, then they did in "Vanilla Freelancer".

Discovery Freelancer is NOT 'Vanilla Freelancer", and it sure as heck bears little resemblance to it these days, and I'm hard pressed to believe that that's a bad thing. Discovery took Freelancer, and EXPANDED upon it, and it continues to expand and change in ways that I bet Digital Anvil never even thought Freelancer could.

I also have to wonder what you think is wrong with a faction opening itself up in a manner that makes it more inclusive and accessible?

But, can we talk about the map more, instead of focusing on something because of a specific faction?

[Image: CHI4y9i.png]
[LN] Recruitment | Rachel Baker Bio

Reply  
Offline Fluffyball
03-01-2015, 11:35 PM,
#39
Banned
Posts: 2,426
Threads: 222
Joined: Jul 2013

We aren't following Vanilia Lore?

Dude, we aren't even following Discovery Lore, as every house (minus Gallia perhaps) possess no more than 10 BBs and CVs, not counting these stationary ones.

User was banned for: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=138636
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline Tarator
03-01-2015, 11:48 PM, (This post was last modified: 03-01-2015, 11:49 PM by Tarator.)
#40
Member
Posts: 435
Threads: 21
Joined: Dec 2010

(03-01-2015, 11:35 PM)Toris James Gray Wrote: We aren't following Vanilia Lore?
Dude, we aren't even following Discovery Lore, as every house (minus Gallia perhaps) possess no more than 10 BBs and CVs, not counting these stationary ones.

If thats what you meant:
http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread...ght=census

[Image: giphy.gif]
O'Rhu Cell Database|||O'Rhu Cell Feedback|||Join O'Rhu Cell|||Jump
  Reply  
Pages (14): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 14 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode