• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Rules
« Previous 1 10 11 12 13 14 … 198 Next »
Please release the Core| Caps

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (9): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 9 Next »
Please release the Core| Caps
Offline Alley
05-04-2016, 12:19 PM,
#31
Member
Posts: 4,524
Threads: 406
Joined: Jun 2009

(05-04-2016, 12:11 PM)Thyrzul Wrote:

Karst however is right, Bastilling Core ships simply because they shot on Zoners, implying such is not allowed by their ID while it actually is, was a bad move. Other stuff like lack of RP or reengagement or anything like that is all right to be punished, but I don't think rules should pose an obstacle in the way of roleplay development.

The sanction was very large and out of 5 violations we've only judged 3 as receivable.

We didn't sanction the attack of FP11 or Zoners involved in the fight, we sanctioned Core's refusal to let a dead Order player leave the system and random, unjustified kills of people that had nothing to do with it outside of their ID allowances.

I'm not sure why Garrett bastilled the ships as we could just have discussed it further, but it doesn't matter, this will be solved in a matter of hours. You have plenty of other Core| ships to carry on until the chosen sanction is applied on the ships.

Laz Wrote: Alley was right.
Reply  
Offline Jayce
05-04-2016, 12:20 PM,
#32
Heads Will Roll
Posts: 2,167
Threads: 141
Joined: Nov 2008

(05-04-2016, 12:16 PM)Hannibal Wrote:
(05-04-2016, 12:11 PM)Thyrzul Wrote: Karst however is right, Bastilling Core ships simply because they shot on Zoners, implying such is not allowed by their ID while it actually is, was a bad move..
That's just it,that was not the only reason the ships were sent to bastille but the bellow as well,let's not forget that
Quote:Other stuff like lack of RP or reengagement or anything like that is all right to be punished

I can't speak to the re-engagement, however the Order ship had more than 5 minutes to depart the system before it was engaged again. That part of the sanction is completely unfounded. Here are the logs with timestamps.

[01.05.2016 22:14:21] Death: Order|CV-Osiris was put out of action by A/)-ACV-Eidolon.Wraith (Gun).
[01.05.2016 22:22:17] Death: Order|CV-Osiris was put out of action by PRIME|Empathy (Gun).

8 minutes.

[Image: jKk7NOg.png][Image: 1iGGFXz.gif]
Reply  
Offline Sombs
05-04-2016, 12:23 PM,
#33
Three orange cats in a mech
Posts: 6,806
Threads: 502
Joined: Feb 2014

When did the attack on this begin?




Uncharted System Stories: 18 | 32 | 34 | 37 | 38 | 85

Templates: Character | Transmissions

Alternative Soundtracks


Reply  
Offline Gagadug.
05-04-2016, 12:24 PM,
#34
Member
Posts: 889
Threads: 67
Joined: Jan 2016

Actually it would be much easyer to compensate the loss of the most shared Makos if we hadnt like three capfleets on out doorstep allying with one another disregarding all rules...
Yesterday there even was a CR/IMG/what else convoy guarded by three corsair battleships. Quality RP.
Added to that i see more hate incoming for the Core side of the event

I am for freeing them, too. There even was an Admin statement ID rules dont count, if it was specific it should have been said and not just that thrown in.
Reply  
Offline Stone21
05-04-2016, 12:25 PM,
#35
Member
Posts: 303
Threads: 5
Joined: Jan 2009

(05-04-2016, 12:20 PM)Jayce Wrote:
(05-04-2016, 12:16 PM)Hannibal Wrote:
(05-04-2016, 12:11 PM)Thyrzul Wrote: Karst however is right, Bastilling Core ships simply because they shot on Zoners, implying such is not allowed by their ID while it actually is, was a bad move..
That's just it,that was not the only reason the ships were sent to bastille but the bellow as well,let's not forget that
Quote:Other stuff like lack of RP or reengagement or anything like that is all right to be punished

I can't speak to the re-engagement, however the Order ship had more than 5 minutes to depart the system before it was engaged again. That part of the sanction is completely unfounded. Here are the logs with timestamps.

[01.05.2016 22:14:21] Death: Order|CV-Osiris was put out of action by A/)-ACV-Eidolon.Wraith (Gun).
[01.05.2016 22:22:17] Death: Order|CV-Osiris was put out of action by PRIME|Empathy (Gun).

8 minutes.

Perhaps the CV-OSIRIS was docked at Dabadoru base and it takes quite a lot of minutes to reach Omicron Minor jump hole. Maybe during the way to Minor jump hole he got ambushed again. It happened to me as well a few days ago but I don't care anymore about re-engagers and I simply log off and mind my own business when I get re-engaged.
Reply  
Offline Shiki
05-04-2016, 12:25 PM,
#36
UwU
Posts: 2,754
Threads: 121
Joined: May 2015

(05-04-2016, 12:19 PM)realekki Wrote: 2. add a line in the zoner-id "can engage core everywhere"

Can engage Core in the system with the Zoner bases only rather. Zoners are defending side after all.

[Image: loyolabully.gif]
[Image: Q5rd5YU.png]
Reply  
Offline Jayce
05-04-2016, 12:29 PM,
#37
Heads Will Roll
Posts: 2,167
Threads: 141
Joined: Nov 2008

(05-04-2016, 12:25 PM)Stone21 Wrote:
(05-04-2016, 12:20 PM)Jayce Wrote:
(05-04-2016, 12:16 PM)Hannibal Wrote:
(05-04-2016, 12:11 PM)Thyrzul Wrote: Karst however is right, Bastilling Core ships simply because they shot on Zoners, implying such is not allowed by their ID while it actually is, was a bad move..
That's just it,that was not the only reason the ships were sent to bastille but the bellow as well,let's not forget that
Quote:Other stuff like lack of RP or reengagement or anything like that is all right to be punished

I can't speak to the re-engagement, however the Order ship had more than 5 minutes to depart the system before it was engaged again. That part of the sanction is completely unfounded. Here are the logs with timestamps.

[01.05.2016 22:14:21] Death: Order|CV-Osiris was put out of action by A/)-ACV-Eidolon.Wraith (Gun).
[01.05.2016 22:22:17] Death: Order|CV-Osiris was put out of action by PRIME|Empathy (Gun).

8 minutes.

Perhaps the CV-OSIRIS was docked at Dabadoru base and it takes quite a lot of minutes to reach Omicron Minor jump hole. Maybe during the way to Minor jump hole he got ambushed again. It happened to me as well a few days ago but I don't care anymore about re-engagers and I simply log off and mind my own business when I get re-engaged.

We watched it undock from FP11.

[Image: jKk7NOg.png][Image: 1iGGFXz.gif]
Reply  
Offline Omi
05-04-2016, 12:29 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-04-2016, 12:31 PM by Omi.)
#38
By Unpopular Demand
Posts: 1,716
Threads: 87
Joined: Aug 2007

This whole debacle, while involving a cool event series and such, was doomed to end in tears from the start. When you see the players who instigated it from the Zoner side, it's not hard to figure out that they didn't exactly have pure intentions when they set out to cause all this Delta BS. Many of those on the Zoner/not-Core side have been busy participating in exactly the kind of behaviour they themselves never shut up about hating - and were it not for Alley starting up the (admittedly really fun) event series to take everyone's mind off just how stacked this whole parade is against Core in an ooRP sense as well as an iRP one, said people wouldn't be able to strut around patting themselves on the back for a job well done.

I am thoroughly disgusted that it both takes this sort of ooRP motivation and results in so much ooRP carnage and grief for the server to participate in an iRP event these days.

EDIT DISCLAIMER: No, I'm not in Core|, nor was I when this mess started. I am (for once, lol) as neutral as they come, but things (as I see it) are rapidly worsening for one side much more than the other.

[Image: omicega.gif]
Reply  
Offline realekki
05-04-2016, 12:30 PM,
#39
Member
Posts: 421
Threads: 48
Joined: Feb 2015

(05-04-2016, 12:25 PM)Sheekochan Wrote: Can engage Core in the system with the Zoner bases only rather. Zoners are defending side after all.

ok then "can engage core only in systems with a zoner base/station"

yep thats better

best regard ekki
Reply  
Offline Jack_Henderson
05-04-2016, 12:30 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-04-2016, 12:33 PM by Jack_Henderson.)
#40
Independent Miners Guild
Posts: 6,103
Threads: 391
Joined: Nov 2010

Temporarily unban Lyth: I wrote a player request to temporarily unban Lyth yesterday. The faction needs leadership. I agree fully with a temp release plus ban afterwards.

ID Clarification (temporary ones at least): We need ID clarification, especially now in this event. I suggest having temporary additions/amendments to keep the action going.

Core Caps: Release & Punish for "lesser crimes" only: Imo, the attack on Nevian is a rule violation and the attack on the pvp-dead leaving Order vessel is a rule break. A little more consideration in actions and their consequences in general would be good, also for the sake of "where Core is when this winds down". These " lesser crimes" do not warrant Bastille punishment perhaps - as the total absence of Core| caps is not conducive to how the Delta event is moving at the moment.

If we assume that Core-Zoner clash is wanted (and I think it really is), the action between those factions should be allowed and legal. Therefore Core ID should be allowed to engage Zoners, and Zoners need temporary permission to engage Core. Legalise the clash (perhaps for a limited time frame?) because it creates an interesting scenario. But we urgently need clarification. Nearly 100 % of interactions atm in Delta are violations of ID rules if you go by the letter of the law.

Therefore: clarification of ID (especially engagement rights) is urgently needed.
Reply  
Pages (9): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 9 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode