Admin Note: Faction right #5

[mwerte]

Children, go to your corners and stop taking potshots at each other.

---

[darthbeck]

I want...

Australia!

And thus cannon descended from on high, the server suspending him in place. And he move his hands in an omnipotent gesture of might, And the heavens opened up, revealing chuck norris, who proceeded to rend the fabric of the universe to produce the words that doomed Australia to eternal damnation. The words floated in place, their green radiance distorting space-time locally.

Granted.

If you can't figure out why there wasn't don't bother asking why there wasn't.

+1

All hail dusty!


But yes, this is a good thing, which will hopefully make people think twice before starting a rebellion with those gaint cruisers....

+1

---

<span style="font-family:Century Gothic">Violence is Golden</span>

[n00bl3t]

If you can't figure out why there wasn't don't bother asking why there wasn't.

+1

:lol:

Oh yes, it is rather obvious why there was not. However, it would be nice to see you type why.

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.

[sovereign]

Far more power to the factions I say.

I want...

Australia!

Granted.

I have a new sig.

On topic, these requests will be visible to the public, correct? If so, then I don't see any issues from power abuse that won't be easily spotted and dealt with. n00bl3t, is that satisfactory? I agree that if these were done behind closed doors or via PM then I'd be a bit concerned too, but as long as we can all see them and (should something fishy arise) point out possible abuses on the forum then we're as good as we are with anything else.

---

[Dusty Lens]

Oh yes, it is rather obvious why there was not. However, it would be nice to see you type why.

Oh? Why wasn't there?

[n00bl3t]

I want...

Australia!
Granted.

I have a new sig.

On topic, these requests will be visible to the public, correct? If so, then I don't see any issues from power abuse that won't be easily spotted and dealt with. n00bl3t, is that satisfactory? I agree that if these were done behind closed doors or via PM then I'd be a bit concerned too, but as long as we can all see them and (should something fishy arise) point out possible abuses on the forum then we're as good as we are with anything else.

Wholly transparent would give the system more credibility.

(Yes, the right to see all requests that are submitted.)

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.

[darthbeck]

I have a new sig.

On topic, these requests will be visible to the public, correct? If so, then I don't see any issues from power abuse that won't be easily spotted and dealt with. n00bl3t, is that satisfactory? I agree that if these were done behind closed doors or via PM then I'd be a bit concerned too, but as long as we can all see them and (should something fishy arise) point out possible abuses on the forum then we're as good as we are with anything else.

I agree with sovereign here. It is made of the greatness that becomes a signature.:)

I agree with sovereign here. Everything will be visible. Not to mention how easy it will be to just go get a bribe.

---

<span style="font-family:Century Gothic">Violence is Golden</span>

[Dieter Schprokets]

Not to mention how easy it will be to just go get a bribe.

There is that.

---

[n00bl3t]

There is that.

The Apocalypse_ will let you know how that goes in this thread.

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.

[Cannon]

:lol:

Oh yes, it is rather obvious why there was not. However, it would be nice to see you type why.

Because I liked this idea better than the one that allows only faction leaders have capships (including gunboats).

---

Proud member of "the most paranoid group of people in the community"

Old Avatar #2 | Old Avatar #3