• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 509 510 511 512 513 547 Next »
Leviathan class Supertanker

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (7): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »
Leviathan class Supertanker
Offline Igiss
09-07-2007, 08:56 PM,
#31
Discovery Creator
Posts: 3,181
Threads: 578
Joined: Jun 2005

Do you think it will be logical if Whale had more or same cargo as Large Train or Container Transport? Whale is much smaller in size, that's why it has less cargo.
Reply  
Offline Gamazson
09-07-2007, 09:01 PM,
#32
Member
Posts: 962
Threads: 56
Joined: May 2007

Whale slow and not maneuverable? When I ran the corfu I ditched a L-train for a whale because it preformed better in asteroids. I recommend more flight time with that ship...........

AKA Nexus
  Reply  
Offline Drake
09-07-2007, 09:07 PM,
#33
Member
Posts: 2,195
Threads: 93
Joined: Jun 2007

Well, it has slow thrust speed, though it's more maneuverable than a C-Tran. I probably would use it myself, except it lacks a CM dropper.

I'm not saying that the Whale needs more cargo, but the Leviathan Supertanker could be a 2nd generation version. Much bigger, with much more cargo, but still no guns, and still not the toughest ship around. And much less maneuverable.
Reply  
Offline Dopamino
09-07-2007, 09:17 PM,
#34
Member
Posts: 3,522
Threads: 70
Joined: Jul 2007

ya, even with the highest level transport turrets, i hardly make a dent into a gunboat or bomber. unless theres some turrets that im missing, i think i'd rather have a transport with 5500 cargo (ya,ya, not happening) and no guns.

[Image: GlossyNew2copy-1.png]
I mostly lurk around Media Center these days.
  Reply  
Offline Drake
09-07-2007, 09:29 PM,
#35
Member
Posts: 2,195
Threads: 93
Joined: Jun 2007

' Wrote:ya, even with the highest level transport turrets, i hardly make a dent into a gunboat or bomber. unless theres some turrets that im missing, i think i'd rather have a transport with 5500 cargo (ya,ya, not happening) and no guns.

Level 5 fighter turrets.
Reply  
Offline mohr
09-07-2007, 10:28 PM,
#36
Member
Posts: 219
Threads: 13
Joined: Dec 2006

I am not actually aware of how the Whale handles, actually. I tried one out back in April, but not in combat situation or even in asteroids. I brought the Whale into the discussion b/c this was going to be kinda like a Whale mk 2. I like the Whales design, one of the reasons I wanted to make this. I don't want to change a perfectly fine ship.

One thing I definately want to avoid is making a transport that will replace the Ltrain or make it ridicullously easy to get a cap ship w/ it. I can tell that is a known concern for large transports.

Anyways, a mock-up model should be on display sometime today. I'll try to get some existing models next to it for comparison. I may not be able to due to CMP importer limitations, but I'll try.

Thank you all for the suggestions and opinions!

Mohr


[Image: discoshipwright1nq2.png]
[Image: joyriderstudios2sr0.png][Image: discoveryrptq0.png]
  Reply  
Offline mohr
09-08-2007, 07:29 AM,
#37
Member
Posts: 219
Threads: 13
Joined: Dec 2006

Here are some rough mock ups of what I am planing for the Leviathan.

[Image: tank1eb0.jpg]

[Image: tank2ta3.jpg]

[Image: tank3pr5.jpg]

And some comparisons for scale.

[Image: tankcompare1yz3.jpg]

[Image: tankcompare2ac5.jpg]

This is again a rough design open for suggestions. Thank you ahead of time.

Mohr

[Image: discoshipwright1nq2.png]
[Image: joyriderstudios2sr0.png][Image: discoveryrptq0.png]
  Reply  
Offline I_m_rdy
09-08-2007, 11:00 AM,
#38
Member
Posts: 863
Threads: 23
Joined: Jun 2007

For a rough design it looks very good IMO, we should use that as something like a scale so we can measure the detailed ones with the rough model.

BTW, why does that L.Train have 4 cargo pod carrier thingys? I think it has only 3...

[Image: nowings.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline Panzer
09-08-2007, 12:05 PM,
#39
Man of iron, blood and Nyxes
Posts: 3,092
Threads: 56
Joined: Dec 2006

It's HUGE

Ok, a few from me: The central section should be a sort of an open crago hold - made up of a frames, holding a multitude of cargo pods inside. Tis section's tops ide would look very nice with a bunch of pipelines going throughout the section's length (The Camara has it done very nicely)

[Image: Vxqj04i.gif]
Reply  
Offline Igiss
09-08-2007, 03:03 PM,
#40
Discovery Creator
Posts: 3,181
Threads: 578
Joined: Jun 2005

I think that this ship should be reduced in size at least twice. With its current size it won't even fit a trade lane. Besides, no use for such size if it will have 5000 cargo hold. Since I was willing to introduce more transports of the maximum cargo amount (4500 right now), this ship should be roughly of the size of the large train. And no attachable cargo pods please... better use "virual" pods, like on container transport.
Reply  
Pages (7): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode