• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Developers Forum Discovery Unofficial Development Discovery Mod Content Submissions
« Previous 1 16 17 18 19 20 … 28 Next »
"homeworld" replacements

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (12): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 12 Next »
Thread Closed 
"homeworld" replacements
Offline Tenacity
04-01-2010, 03:14 AM,
#31
Member
Posts: 9,496
Threads: 635
Joined: Apr 2008

I like them, my only suggestion is that when these replacements go through, the 'useless' / 'cheap' homeworld ships get buffed up to mk2 equivalents.

For example, the Gitano is a pretty crappy light fighter, barely on par with the mk 1 vanilla light fighters, nobody uses it for that reason. Buff it up to mk 2 level so it's capable against the 'real' ships being used by everyone else, and we'll see it a lot more.

Also, you forgot the waran =)

[Image: Tenacity.gif]
Offline Thexare
04-01-2010, 03:22 AM,
#32
Ominously Humming
Posts: 3,821
Threads: 340
Joined: Apr 2008

' Wrote:i always forget - the renzu line ( basalt, mafic and something else ) is under the supervision of some playerfaction now, isn t it? - especially the design of the basalt and the mafic might need approval, cause they are quite ... different or maybe too close to the AP line.
Renzu is the Ki, Saishi, Touketsu, Anki, and Wasupu - the Basalt, Mafic, and Dacite (the something else) are general-purpose civilian with no listed manufacturer. I don't have much else in the way of useful comment, so...

I want that Ki.
Offline kingvaillant
04-01-2010, 03:46 AM,
#33
Member
Posts: 2,961
Threads: 207
Joined: Aug 2007

Civilian ships: Add a engine to it, in your description, it seems like those ships won't produce any flames:(impedes the immersion I believe.

Bulldog: I do like the asymmetrical one, but make the wings symmetrical.

Overall, extremely nice work, simple, efficient, pretty looking.

Sometimes, putting too much butter on the bread gives nothin better

Director of the Liberty Security Force: Fidelity, Bravery and Integrity
[Image: f_48123637838m_812390c.png]
The Amundsen Zone-21 Restrictions
 
Offline ivr56
04-01-2010, 03:50 AM,
#34
Member
Posts: 2,089
Threads: 154
Joined: Dec 2007

I like the Bulldog quite a bit.
Can't wait to see improvements and textures.

[Image: ivr56.png]
[Image: ivr56.png]
[Image: ptrans.png]
[Image: 3589.gif]
 
Guest
04-01-2010, 04:39 AM,
#35
Unregistered
 

' Wrote:this here is "the other bulldog" concept. - it is horizontal, asymetrical - very short, quite flat - probably very hard to fly AND hit other players with due to the shape.
but i considered it a little "too ugly"
[Image: theotherbulldog.png]
DO WANT.

Why can't Junker ships be ugly? I can't speak for random people who use the Junker tag to pirate in Kusari Explorers, but I fly as a Junker (when I fly at all) because I love the CSV's artistic style. And junk itself. More "ugly" welded-together piles of scrap, please!
Offline Jinx
04-01-2010, 07:04 AM,
#36
skipasmiður
Posts: 7,685
Threads: 313
Joined: Sep 2007

the renzu line is still being done by sasaki? - haven t heard of him for some time. - but its good to know indeed ( saves a lot of work ) - i ll spare out the renzu ships then and focus on the others - so Ki, Saishi, Touketsu, Anki, and Wasupu won t be proceeded at that point.

[Image: just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png]
Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC
Offline Tenacity
04-01-2010, 07:08 AM,
#37
Member
Posts: 9,496
Threads: 635
Joined: Apr 2008

Definitely get that new mafic and basalt in, at least.

The asymmetrical mafic looks awesum.

[Image: Tenacity.gif]
Offline Geromix
04-01-2010, 07:52 AM,
#38
Member
Posts: 108
Threads: 1
Joined: Mar 2010


I love the Ki,its done really well. Too bad you won't proceed further with it.

I don't know whether to like or hate the asymmetrical one.

As far as the others are concerned,I like the way Gitano has been done. Can't wait to see them with textures on!


[Image: UT12.png]
 
Offline Miaou
04-01-2010, 11:24 AM,
#39
Cat Pilot
Posts: 1,642
Threads: 131
Joined: Mar 2009

' Wrote:DO WANT.

Why can't Junker ships be ugly? I can't speak for random people who use the Junker tag to pirate in Kusari Explorers, but I fly as a Junker (when I fly at all) because I love the CSV's artistic style. And junk itself. More "ugly" welded-together piles of scrap, please!

I agree with this. Junker ships should look more like flying balls of scrap and parts of other ships with random massive lasers poking out.

Heck, look at the Salvager. Its missing panels, rusting, and up close its burns the eyes. You look at all of it, its a beautiful ship with a purpose.

Characters & Stories
 
Offline Jansen
04-01-2010, 01:02 PM,
#40
Member
Posts: 4,110
Threads: 501
Joined: Jan 2009

Wow! Great work, would be awesome to have those ugly ships replaced with those :yahoo:

[Image: HkdyBql.gif]
Pages (12): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 12 Next »
Thread Closed 


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode