Faction Status Thread

[Dab]

If the factions' wiki page holds all the listed information, may our faction status post simply be a link to our wiki page, or must we also include that information in the post itself?

---

[The Liberty Rogues]

6) List of permitted ships and weapons in original faction creation request and links to approved special roleplays.

Can you please clarify what we have to do for this?

Are these the lists of ships our faction is allowed to use via SRP/Whitecell

Or is it a list of Whitecell tech that we have given out?

Apart from #6 the Liberty Rogue Faction Status is updated to meet the new requirements. I'll use the unused info from the old faction status to re-write our recruitment thread another time.

Our roster is currently out-dated by a fair bit, but as soon as we've finished renevations with in the faction I will begin to update it regularly once more.

If the factions' wiki page holds all the listed information, may our faction status post simply be a link to our wiki page, or must we also include that information in the post itself?

Anyone can edit the Wiki. Are you sure you want that to be the only source of your faction's status?

---

[img=0x150]http://i.imgur.com/jGvKoXe.png[/img]
This is a shared forum account between @sindroms and @Impyness . When reading roleplay posts done by this account, please take note of the character it is from. Andrew M. for the former and Charlie P. for the later.
INFO | RECRUITMENT | TITLES | OBJECTIVE LIST | MESSAGE DUMP | GUIDELINES

[Liberty Police Inc.]

Hi. If any of you forum mods have time, it'd be great if you could change ownership of the LPI's faction post from Zapp to this shared forum account. We haven't been able to update it since he left, for obvious reasons.

On another note: If you have time, it'd be much appreciated if you could do the same for our message dump and recruitment thread.

[Kusari Uchugun]

Hi. If any of you forum mods have time, it'd be great if you could change ownership of the LPI's faction post from Zapp to this shared forum account. We haven't been able to update it since he left, for obvious reasons.

On another note: If you have time, it'd be much appreciated if you could do the same for our message dump and recruitment thread.

we from KNF would also be much appreciated if you could do the same for us.

So please change ownership for ours Legal codex, recruitment thread
from previous owners to this shared acc

due to our impossibility of editing we have this

There are 3 posts about the KNF in the thread. One by Lotek, one by casero and one by Kamakura Shogunate. Maybe delete the first 2 ?

---

KNF Subforum | Recruitment | Kusari Bounty Board | Kusari Legal Codex | Feedback | Kusari Licenses | The Blossom

[Slainte]

Gateway Interstellar post cleaned and updated.

---

[mwerte]

So, you want us to trim down the amount of information in our faction status post, yet add a full roster? I'm sure that'll go real well for the LN, BAF, CR, ect. :rolleyes:

I have far better things to do with my time, since the admins are so enthusiastic about this happening, I would assume that they are more then willing to help right?

---

[Daedric]

I'll update OSI's when I have a chance this week.

On another note though. Why do we even have the posts? Can't that thread be one single post with a listing. Said listing can link to faction's Faction Information thread. The OP of that thread can contain all the information required by the OP of this thread. If factions don't want feedback it can be locked.

This has been suggested before. I am unsure as to why it isn't being implemented, it would be FAR easily to maintain the Faction Status listing as you wouldn't have to update links when a post is hidden or redone. Since you know, you don't have to hide posts if it links to another thread.

I'm just saying but I'm not saying. :D

---

Helpful Discovery Guides

Get Help Here! | Player Base Guide | Mining Guide | Trading Guide

Reputation Guide | Zoner Rep Guide

OSI Information | Join OSI! | Nichols Trade Center
OSI Bounty Board | OSI Feedback

[mwerte]

On another note though. Why do we even have the posts? Can't that thread be one single post with a listing. Said listing can link to faction's Faction Information thread. The OP of that thread can contain all the information required by the OP of this thread. If factions don't want feedback it can be locked.

I proposed that and even got Igiss to change the forum name, but left the moderating team before it was implemented and nobody picked up the project after that.

---

[n00bl3t]

Is that possible to upkeep anonymousity of some members?

Yes. Just do not list them. Administrators have the tools to work out who is playing anyway and under what forum account. (Except in some circumstances, but we will ignore those.)

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.

[Athenian]

So, you want us to trim down the amount of information in our faction status post, yet add a full roster? I'm sure that'll go real well for the LN, BAF, CR, ect. :rolleyes:

I have far better things to do with my time, since the admins are so enthusiastic about this happening, I would assume that they are more then willing to help right?

Trim the detailed histories and the images. The full roster is not a new requirement; it has always been there. It may be a unnecessary requirement, given the tools available to us, but that is another matter. If you had read my post above (I guess you have better things to do with your time than read the entire thread) you would see that I am trying to figure out a way to provide a full roster for faction leaders (maybe with ship type included) that might save them the effort.

As for the amount of information - one faction had two posts - the story was interesting, just not pertinent to the purpose of the thread and clearly beyond what was asked for; other posts had images of the ships allowed - pretty, but not necessary.

So either the status post is your status post or it isn't. Links will do fine, but the minimum amount of information needs to be available in one place, at the very least to serve as a record for diplomacy, tech allowance (the stuff you use, not the stuff given out) and leaders (the last especially as these people have certain powers over non faction members who carry the same ID).

Yawn. I guess I'll make a template for all the important stuff and you can copy that. Unless someone else wants to. Anyone? Bueller?

Sigh. Remember folks, less is more.

Code:

[b]Faction Name[/b]
[b]In-Game Tag[/b]
[b]Primary ID[/b]
[b]Secondary ID[/b]

[b]Description[/b]
[color=#33FF33]Allies[/color]
[color=#FF0000]Enemies[/color]
[color=#FFFFFF]Neutral[/color]

[b]Permitted Ships:[/b]
[b]Permitted Guns:[/b]
[b]Special Roleplays Permitted:[/b]

Leaders [url=link to your showuser screeen]leadername[/url]
[url=thread]Faction History & Description[/url]
[url=thread]Recruitment[/url]
[url=thread]Message Dump[/url]
[url=insertlinkhere]Membership Roster[/url]

Possibly this might be something easier for all to use?

Malicious rules changes? Don't make me laugh.

edit: Here's what the code creates:
Faction Name Bretonian Boy Scouts
In-Game Tag @BBS;|
Primary ID Bretonian Police
Secondary ID Trader

Description
The BBS are a pack of dimwits recruited to eat toast and rhubarb.
Their goals are to eat toast, have a monopoly on the growth of rhubarb, and figure out the problem of premature baldness.
Allies Bretonian lawful corporations & military
Enemies Criminals and pirates; Kusari lawful corporations and military
Neutral Zoners and furries

Permitted Ships: Civilian; Bretonian
Permitted Guns: Civilian; Bretonian
Special Roleplays Permitted: We stole a barge

Leaders Igiss
Faction History & Description
Recruitment
Message Dump
Membership Roster

---

Former member of "the most paranoid group of people in the community"
Discovery Community Forum Rules