• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 255 256 257 258 259 … 547 Next »
gmg bomber revision question to the community

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: which one?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
old one
34.83%
31 34.83%
new one
65.17%
58 65.17%
Total 89 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Pages (5): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
gmg bomber revision question to the community
Offline Rommie
05-13-2011, 07:01 PM,
#31
Member
Posts: 1,585
Threads: 46
Joined: Mar 2009

It's too advanced/developed for a first generation ship.

Voted for the old one.

In space, nobody knows I'm a panda
Reply  
Offline Blodo
05-13-2011, 07:06 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-13-2011, 07:10 PM by Blodo.)
#32
No Pilot
Posts: 2,852
Threads: 128
Joined: Jan 2008

Jinx the new one still looks more like the Waran than the old Taiidan. The horizontal wings on the side of the bulk don't do it at all, the progression is rather bad. Make the wings like they were on the Taiidan, behind the bulk and mounted on the circular engines. 4 wings in an "X" configuration, not 2, and they should be long enough to be noticeable from head on. Also vertically the ship bulk in the mid section should probably become smaller to make it look leaner and not like a huge brick. Remember, this ship *should* be aerodynamic, it is designed for nebula warfare.

If you change the newest one according to this, I think it has potential.
  Reply  
Offline Daedric
05-13-2011, 07:55 PM,
#33
Member
Posts: 4,321
Threads: 111
Joined: Nov 2010

I agree the old version needs a update but I think (of the people that spoke up) we'd much like it to be as similar to the current model as possible. I myself fancy the new model without the fins; but if you made the back look similar to the back of the old model I'd be you'd get more support. People (including me) just love the old model, even with its imperfections.

Helpful Discovery Guides

Get Help Here! | Player Base Guide | Mining Guide | Trading Guide
Reputation Guide | Zoner Rep Guide
[Image: 50px-OSILogo.png]
OSI Information | Join OSI! | Nichols Trade Center
OSI Bounty Board | OSI Feedback
Reply  
Offline Jinx
05-13-2011, 08:00 PM,
#34
skipasmiður
Posts: 7,685
Threads: 313
Joined: Sep 2007

there is a lot more about the "bulk" than just - mass...

the old taidan bomber - or rather the old gmg bomber was a HW1 model with 4 winglets shaped like an X.

the first kaichou is basicly a streamlined dragon cockpit section with two heavy heatsinks making the "wings" - and one upper and lower frame where the torps are mounted

the rear engine is meant to be similar to the rheinland ships...


the revision however is a long cockpit section that is only attached to the reactor - the two massive heatsinks are not connected to the body at all anymore - but are connected to the axis which holds the stubby wings.

those wings are embedded in the octagon frame - which is connected to the reactor housing.

the entire ship is a lot "lighter" than the old kaichou - cause it is a lot more modular - with more space between the parts.

it is unlikely that i really change that design, cause changing it according to the suggestions takes the individual parts severely out of proportion. even the removal of the decorative wings doesn t really work.




a model can be changed - but not too much, cause the sum of the parts still need to be in harmony.


take that ship as an offer. - and the poll as a neutral way to ask the community. ( the poll and the replies )

either way - the gmg should be quite happy .. cause they gain a freighter that doesn t make you throw up when you use it. ( and to be honest - it appears that more than enough ppl are perfectly happy with the old bombers looks anyway - so it would really feel redundant to replace it ... there is nothing really wrong with the old model in terms of quality )



[Image: just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png]
Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC
Reply  
Offline DeathsOverture
05-13-2011, 08:10 PM,
#35
Member
Posts: 1,126
Threads: 42
Joined: Oct 2008

' Wrote:(... there is nothing really wrong with the old model in terms of quality )

I don't know Jinx. There's something funky going on there.

Warning, cannot be unseen!

[Image: kaichourear.png]


[Image: GMG_banner.png]
Reply  
Offline Kuze
05-13-2011, 08:16 PM,
#36
Member
Posts: 430
Threads: 11
Joined: Oct 2008

I allways wonders what happens with all the not used or disapproved ships you guys make? They rust on HDD till the ends? Why are they not released in ship packs? Anyway back to topic...

-The new freighter have those textures on the fins...they look cheesy
-The new bomber...well where is the resemblance with the Waran? Ok I think sometimes judging the ships by RP is just weird...that ship is darn good looking...the old one just looks good. Refiting the ships is a natural proces IMO, and if there is an oportunity to have more sophisticated and awesome ships, why not to use it?

[Image: uzdlytw.png]
Sketchfab - deviantART - p3d - ArtStation
Reply  
Offline Rommie
05-13-2011, 08:19 PM,
#37
Member
Posts: 1,585
Threads: 46
Joined: Mar 2009

' Wrote:I don't know Jinx. There's something funky going on there.

Warning, cannot be unseen!

[Image: kaichourear.png]


That's not exactly a problem. That's just texture not being mirrored.

In space, nobody knows I'm a panda
Reply  
Offline teschy
05-13-2011, 08:51 PM,
#38
20yrs & I Only Got This Title
Posts: 2,471
Threads: 24
Joined: Jan 2007

Play him off...
Reply  
Offline Jinx
05-13-2011, 08:54 PM,
#39
skipasmiður
Posts: 7,685
Threads: 313
Joined: Sep 2007

sadly - it has reached "flood" levels - the poll can be closed now

[Image: just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png]
Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC
Reply  
Offline Huhuh
05-14-2011, 01:13 AM,
#40
Member
Posts: 2,458
Threads: 148
Joined: Apr 2010

I haven't read most of the thread, but I think I have an idea why people like the old one.

It's smaller so it is better in pvp )))))))

[Image: 6fZYcda.gif]

Reply  
Pages (5): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode