• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Rules Faction Rules Faction Review and Feedback Archived Feedback Threads
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Admin Feedback Thread (Archived)

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard
Corsair Kills - 0 / 1,000
Lawful Kills - 0 / 1,000
Red Hessian Kills - 0 / 1,000
Unlawful Kills - 0 / 1,000

Latest activity

Pages (122): « Previous 1 … 41 42 43 44 45 … 122 Next »
Thread Closed 
Admin Feedback Thread (Archived)
Offline Alley
03-21-2016, 11:02 AM,
#421
Member
Posts: 4,524
Threads: 406
Joined: Jun 2009

Problem atm is that we can't really do anything but provide full admin access. FLHook's permission system just sucks.

Laz Wrote: Alley was right.
Offline sindroms
03-21-2016, 12:57 PM,
#422
Member
Posts: 9,436
Threads: 985
Joined: Feb 2008

Since more people are suggestiong mini events, I wanted to bring forward a small idea I had some time ago, after the events of the Garrett's Thor.
This was a suggestion I gave Garrett some time ago, not sure if anything came of it, but here is the gist of it.


Giving either an admin or trusted member access to an overpowered ship and a modified Event Terrorist ID, which can only attack in self defense and couple it with an over the top ship. A seven-snac bomber was perhaps a bit over the top and not exactly fair to anything larger than a fighter, so perhaps having a gunboat or similar size ship with, say, a battleship shield, full BS prims (not cerbs) and inf core would be a challenging but not impossible to kill target that people would gladly gang up on to get a kill on.

If the ship was flown by an admin, this could also lead to goodies being dropped upon killing it.

The main idea for it is very forward, instead of an outright terrorist ID, the ship would only be able to engage in self defense - as such whoever attacks it should be very well prepared for the consequences. This would prevent said player from roflstomping lone targets, for example, and the ship combo itself would force people to make large hunting-squards to deal with it.

Random idea is random.

--------------
PSA: If you have been having stutter/FPS lag on Disco where it does not run as smoothly as other games, please look at the fix here: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...pid2306502
----------
Offline SnakThree
03-21-2016, 01:01 PM,
#423
Member
Posts: 9,092
Threads: 337
Joined: Mar 2010

It was 15 SNACs.

[Image: rTrJole.png][Image: LJ88XSk.png]
[Image: ka0AQa5.png][Image: QwWqCS8.png]
 
Offline Zayne Carrick
03-21-2016, 02:14 PM, (This post was last modified: 03-21-2016, 02:16 PM by Zayne Carrick.)
#424
Member
Posts: 1,523
Threads: 97
Joined: Apr 2012

Quote:Giving either an admin or trusted member access to an overpowered ship and a modified Event Terrorist ID, which can only attack in self defense and couple it with an over the top ship. A seven-snac bomber was perhaps a bit over the top and not exactly fair to anything larger than a fighter, so perhaps having a gunboat or similar size ship with, say, a battleship shield, full BS prims (not cerbs) and inf core would be a challenging but not impossible to kill target that people would gladly gang up on to get a kill on.
If the ship was flown by an admin, this could also lead to goodies being dropped upon killing it.
Next week in Conn:
"LFG for Event Terrorist: 2 repair ships, 1 battleship(cau6+) and 4 bombers(nova+asuras+cloak) know tacts "
You really want it?
Offline Skorak
03-21-2016, 02:21 PM,
#425
3x Custom User Title
Posts: 4,422
Threads: 503
Joined: Mar 2008

Quote:admin or trusted member
Offline Fhloston Paradise
03-21-2016, 02:48 PM,
#426
Member
Posts: 87
Threads: 16
Joined: Apr 2010

Loved that Synth Marijuana run, could we have that again or something else like it soon?
 
Offline Stoner_Steve
04-10-2016, 12:23 AM,
#427
Master of Arms
Posts: 2,551
Threads: 339
Joined: Jan 2014

regarding the new rules around Furry's (since the thread was locked rather than the trolls being temp banned)

#1. Are the admins and/or mod team planning on spending time actually reading each and every RP posts to ensure they comply with this new rule, or is the team going to be dependent on members of the community to report it for them. Because as was brought up in the thread there are very few furrys in this game. And i'm sure there are several members of the community who will take pride in the fact that they will now be able to badger and report each and every post that comes from those furrys as they don't meet the newly imposed rule

#2. Given that this rule came out of the blue will the admin team allow a certain "grace" period for those members of the community to re-conn their RP to within the new guideline

#3. is Hypertrichosis (Werewolf Syndrome) considered within RP, could I claim that I was already furry due to this syndrome and had my face screwed up in a reactor accident? After all we already have some gnarly looking humans
Offline SnakThree
04-10-2016, 04:51 AM,
#428
Member
Posts: 9,092
Threads: 337
Joined: Mar 2010

I am rather concerned why furries were targeted explicitly. Leaving cats, dogs, ducks and other exotic and absolutely out of place characters allowed.

[Image: rTrJole.png][Image: LJ88XSk.png]
[Image: ka0AQa5.png][Image: QwWqCS8.png]
 
Offline Jeremy Hunter
04-10-2016, 04:52 AM,
#429
Member
Posts: 6,094
Threads: 200
Joined: Jul 2009

(04-10-2016, 04:51 AM)Snak3 Wrote: I am rather concerned why furries were targeted explicitly. Leaving cats, dogs, ducks and other exotic and absolutely out of place characters allowed.

Catgirls are also specifically targeted, but Drrobe told me since Klingons are human they're fine. Go figure.
Offline SnakThree
04-10-2016, 05:05 AM,
#430
Member
Posts: 9,092
Threads: 337
Joined: Mar 2010

I find this more of a political stunt rather than solving actual issues. Or at least a decision that is poorly thought out with a very narrow target audience of two people.

While we have theoretical problems as ability to engage without RP ( Wilde ), broken IDs that are not being fixed for a month, event requests that are not being hosted for four months, people on probation/temp ban posting ooRP crap and other issues that are more common and more important than 2 furry fans.

[Image: rTrJole.png][Image: LJ88XSk.png]
[Image: ka0AQa5.png][Image: QwWqCS8.png]
 
Pages (122): « Previous 1 … 41 42 43 44 45 … 122 Next »
Thread Closed 


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode