Junker Roleplay in light of new Lawful ID

[Sabru]

An interesting thing to note: The Libertonian Legal Codex does -not- list any Quasilawful ID's as criminal, so it goes to show that the people blowing up Quasilawful ships, at least in Liberty, are not in fact, interested in RP.

Note the bolded part. isnt that the stigma attached to the LNS tag already? that most, but not all, are players who dont give 2 hoots about RP.

I will say this though, I don't think it's entirely fair to target quasilawfuls just for sitting on tradelanes, maybe the line should be amended to say "May attack quasilawfuls associated with criminal organizations" or "May attack quasilawfuls known to partake in criminal activities" or something like that.

Now this i could agree with, BUT it would need to be justified by something like the Lib lawful BOLO system for example.

I do think that "Sitting near tradelanes" is an odd reasoning.

indeed. i question how they reasoned this in the first place.

as to the 'perfect world' you mentioned where indies dont lolwut around in caps, thats possible to achieve simply by the devs setting a few simple restrictions.

The only thing preventing that is the QQ brigade which surfaces whenever indie caps threatened by sense and reason.

---

[Zayne Carrick]

As captain of LNS-WHITELINE on screen I should admit, that this lines in lawful IDs are really stupid.
And I will blow each and every "quasilawful scum"(except for LSF) I meet, until IDs become fixed.
Know what's most interesting? The only thing which can be applied to me is FR5 to junkers/zoners/freelancers, which I don't care about.

[Kazinsal]

Or, in theory, the LN could FR5 you for completely going against the sanity of LN roleplay.

---

Retired, permanently.

[Govedo13]

In the reality they cant. check post #18 it explains why they cant.
It is quite strange why so many people around have no clue about faction rules and what factions can do and cannot do.

---

€œ

Official faction players that are often accused of elitism, never deploy them and have those weird, immersion killing "fair fight/dueling" suicidal hobbies. (yes, i've seen enough of those lolduels, where house military with overwhelming force on the field willingly loses a pilot in a duel. ffs.)

[Sabru]

what i find funny about all of this, is that whoever put the line in the IDs is technically guilty of violating 1.2 because these lines harm server gameplay.

---

[Lythrilux]

what i find funny about all of this, is that whoever put the line in the IDs is technically guilty of violating 1.2 because these lines harm server gameplay.

(rofl) it's funny 'cause it's true.

---

[Ponge]

what i find funny about all of this, is that whoever put the line in the IDs is technically guilty of violating 1.2 because these lines harm server gameplay.

Now I totally agree with this. Hm, what would happen if I file a sanction report about this rulebreaking? Name of offender: Dev team...
Zayne, I might even join the fray. If the ID allows it, no sanction can be done against it. End of story.

---

[Zayne Carrick]

what i find funny about all of this, is that whoever put the line in the IDs is technically guilty of violating 1.2 because these lines harm server gameplay.

ID overrides server rules in case of conflict, so npnpnp

[Sabru]

what i find funny about all of this, is that whoever put the line in the IDs is technically guilty of violating 1.2 because these lines harm server gameplay.

ID overrides server rules in case of conflict, so npnpnp

hahahaha XD

admins =

---

[Huhuh]

admins =

Final nail

---