• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Developers Forum
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5
2014's Survey

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
2014's Survey
Offline Chucc
11-26-2014, 01:52 AM,
#41
Member
Posts: 468
Threads: 32
Joined: Jun 2006

Answered survey.

I'm surprised and not to see so few old players around still. Where have all my people gone? What have you done with them? I'll get you for this.

Looking into returning, maybe.
  Reply  
Offline Vogel
11-26-2014, 02:11 AM,
#42
Member
Posts: 687
Threads: 57
Joined: Jan 2010

I responded.

I gave a lot of "No's" that had no room for explanation. This is primarily because I see certain things as a diversion of effort that could be used more productively. Deployable battleships, for example, would be better served by various defensive options for POBs. Unless player-flown battleships are treated identically, which is to say they can be destroyed "for good," it doesn't make enough sense to drop them around. Besides, don't we want players flying instead of pointing to their NPC minions?
  Reply  
Offline Technogeist
11-26-2014, 02:25 AM,
#43
Member
Posts: 300
Threads: 11
Joined: Oct 2013

To be honest I think we need cheap but easy to kill outposts to be used as staging grounds and defensive positions in fights. move the front lines around in systems like Magellan and Texas/Bering etc, but not weak enough for a random cap8 guy to come along as its being built and ruin it. that would make things interesting I think.

(05-26-2014, 09:29 AM)Narcotic Wrote:
(05-26-2014, 09:19 AM)Thyrzul Wrote: ID? IFF? ZoI? Diplomacy? Technology?

Corsair, Corsair, Corsair, Corsair, Corsair?
Reply  
Offline tothebonezone
11-26-2014, 03:15 AM,
#44
Banned
Posts: 1,016
Threads: 49
Joined: Mar 2013

Answered.

Doubt my suggestion is worth anything

User was banned for: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=202684
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline tothebonezone
11-26-2014, 03:21 AM, (This post was last modified: 11-26-2014, 03:22 AM by tothebonezone.)
#45
Banned
Posts: 1,016
Threads: 49
Joined: Mar 2013

Double posting.

(11-25-2014, 09:33 AM)VincentX Wrote: Have you guys even bothered to find out _anything_ about Star Citizen?

Star Citizen will be Freelancer on steroids, even if they manage to produce only half of what they promise.

The issue with promises is that, they're only promises, and developers are very keen on not keeping any promises.

On top of that, Roberts keeps releasing new packs and ships for exorbitant prices going GIVE ME YOUR SHEKELS and holding out his hands with a dozen gold rings around his fingers.

The modules look okay, but I've seen nothing of the real core of the gameplay, and I will continue remaining doubtful of the game until it's been out, played, and reviewed by people who aren't buying in to the hype to try and avoid buyers remorse for their $5,000 ship pack DLC they bought.

User was banned for: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=202684
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline SnakeLancerHaven
12-16-2014, 06:26 PM, (This post was last modified: 12-16-2014, 06:27 PM by SnakeLancerHaven.)
#46
Volgograd Industrial
Posts: 2,873
Threads: 238
Joined: Feb 2012

Nice, as always, Discovery in Star Citizen would be an awesome idea, as I always said. Currently the game itself has around 350'000 Players, if not more I don't remember, just having 10'000 of them inside Discovery Mod would be awesome enough. Therefor, there are also NPCs so np np.

As for stationary Battleships, I've always discussed this with a friend of mine and it would indeed be awesome!

I've left various of stuff, hope you guys realy consider reading it. Thanks for your time.

[Image: ?key=dc385ef2304f0cab6f94da42bc2ff703cf5...5BS0UucG5n]
R.I.P Tabris...
Youtube - Twitch - My old Account
  Reply  
Online Kauket
12-16-2014, 07:36 PM,
#47
Dark Lord of the Birbs
Posts: 6,563
Threads: 506
Joined: Nov 2014
Staff roles:
Art Developer

Filled it out, enjoy going through my walls of text Tongue

And ehh Star Citizen... Not everyone has a super computer to run it, plus the UI looks complex and a bit annoying

[Image: kauket.gif]
Reply  
Offline Sciamach
12-16-2014, 07:44 PM,
#48
Member
Posts: 1,643
Threads: 114
Joined: Jul 2013

Submitted.
When the time comes, please note the following: I WILL NOT BE SILENCED


Also: not so sure on the whole Star Citizen thing...

I'm keeping a safe distance from the game myself, avoiding spending any money on it, as a precaution measure I've started using whenever a game starts to look overhyped or too-good to be true.

[ sci·am·ach ]
/sīˈamək/
A simple, angry man casually working his way through life on a personal quest to acquire copious amounts of street cred.
Reply  
Offline pitockm
12-16-2014, 09:00 PM,
#49
Member
Posts: 471
Threads: 23
Joined: Dec 2011

anyways. How Trading factions would be able to use a Battleship inrp as a HQ ?

i say keep it for non-trade factions. But in Return. add MORE armor or reduce the repair costs and amounts for trading factions. PLox!
Reply  
Offline Hidamari
12-18-2014, 04:51 PM,
#50
Member
Posts: 2,100
Threads: 217
Joined: Jul 2009

(11-22-2014, 06:25 PM)Omicega Wrote: Change the last question to be about Elite: Dangerous rather than trashy 2018 vaporware and we might have a deal.

In any case, answered.

And it now comes to light that infact Elite Dangerous is bad.
Reply  
Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode