• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General News and Announcements
« Previous 1 … 18 19 20 21 22 46 Next »
ID Change: Cryer Pharmaceuticals

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (8): « Previous 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »
ID Change: Cryer Pharmaceuticals
Offline Radion
04-04-2016, 05:44 PM,
#41
Member
Posts: 241
Threads: 35
Joined: May 2014

(04-04-2016, 05:39 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: Taking this away from them will needlessly harm the faction. There is no positive enforcement, only negative.
If that's the case, I want the "Can engage freely" line back on the K'Hara ID
Reply  
Offline Shiki
04-04-2016, 05:45 PM,
#42
UwU
Posts: 2,754
Threads: 121
Joined: May 2015

(04-04-2016, 05:39 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: @Shiki and Radion

Read my post carefully. It is not something you can make a comparison to. Wisp raid Alpha, gain activity for themselves and the rest of the server. It's within their ID lines and their RP.

Taking this away from them will needlessly harm the faction. There is no positive enforcement, only negative.


Am, was there an actual fight or other proper activity?

[Image: loyolabully.gif]
[Image: Q5rd5YU.png]
Reply  
Offline Lythrilux
04-04-2016, 05:45 PM,
#43
Edgy Worlds
Posts: 10,356
Threads: 737
Joined: Jan 2013

(04-04-2016, 05:44 PM)Radion Wrote:
(04-04-2016, 05:39 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: Taking this away from them will needlessly harm the faction. There is no positive enforcement, only negative.
If that's the case, I want the "Can engage freely" line back on the K'Hara ID

That's not the same thing and you know it. That line lead to sanctions and was destructive to gameplay and RP. In fact it actually lead to the specific Corp they targetted to start logging in less frequently.

Cryer shooting OC wherever isn't.

[Image: Lythrilux.gif]
Reply  
Offline Yak
04-04-2016, 05:45 PM,
#44
Member
Posts: 304
Threads: 33
Joined: Apr 2015

(04-04-2016, 04:42 PM)Sheekochan Wrote: There are the corporate factions without "can attack anywhere" line like... let's say Bowex, Gateway and USI, they have no problem with activity or roleplay. Cryer still can demand cardamine which is reflects the actual RP of struggle against the drug, attacking random armed groups of LR or Outcasts is something that making less sense.

To respond to this very quickly. Firstly, I did say that restricting that line may make sense.

And secondly, if Cryer as a whole is trying to combat cardamine which it (from my point of view) sees as both a social and economic problem, why would they put effort into creating a "cure", spend large amounts of time to stop the occasional transport, and then just completely ignore the vast and organised support network in place for the distribution of the drug?
Reply  
Offline Lythrilux
04-04-2016, 05:46 PM, (This post was last modified: 04-04-2016, 05:47 PM by Lythrilux.)
#45
Edgy Worlds
Posts: 10,356
Threads: 737
Joined: Jan 2013

(04-04-2016, 05:45 PM)Sheekochan Wrote: Am, was there an actual fight or other proper activity?

There would be if Cross didn't try ganking them with 10 Ranseurs every time they wanted to create activity because Scourge and the CC bandwagon feel their integrity is being threatening.

[Image: Lythrilux.gif]
Reply  
Offline Corile
04-04-2016, 05:46 PM,
#46
C::iemka pl
Posts: 3,248
Threads: 267
Joined: Apr 2014

(04-04-2016, 05:45 PM)Sheekochan Wrote:
(04-04-2016, 05:39 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: @Shiki and Radion

Read my post carefully. It is not something you can make a comparison to. Wisp raid Alpha, gain activity for themselves and the rest of the server. It's within their ID lines and their RP.

Taking this away from them will needlessly harm the faction. There is no positive enforcement, only negative.


Am, was there an actual fight or other proper activity?

No, because no Outcast or GC faction was willing to put up a healthy fight that would be beneficial in activity to both sides.




Reflections on the Revolution in Gallia
Custodi // High City of Heraklion // The Cult of Archangels
Log Filter // Post Creator // Manhattan
  Reply  
Offline Karst
04-04-2016, 05:47 PM,
#47
Chariot of Light
Posts: 2,986
Threads: 214
Joined: Sep 2009

(04-04-2016, 04:56 PM)Radion Wrote: I run what I like to think is a very successful trade faction, and I get none of these "Can pew X anywhere" lines. Therefore, I fail to see how a line like that is necessary for a faction's survival. There are plenty of opportunities out there for RP. Claiming that removing this one aspect will kill the faction means that the faction in question is extremely narrow-minded and one-dimensional.

That's a very poor comparison. The "can engage Outcasts" line is the main draw that makes the Cryer ID attractive to some, as it's an otherwise subpar corporate ID with mediocre diplomacy and strict RP restrictions for cargo.

Removing that line is akin to lowering the 5k cargo limit for USI, that is removing the primary reason for people to consider using the ID rather than another.

[Image: jWv1kDa.png]
Reply  
Offline Shiki
04-04-2016, 05:50 PM,
#48
UwU
Posts: 2,754
Threads: 121
Joined: May 2015

(04-04-2016, 05:46 PM)Protégé Wrote:
(04-04-2016, 05:45 PM)Sheekochan Wrote:
(04-04-2016, 05:39 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: @Shiki and Radion

Read my post carefully. It is not something you can make a comparison to. Wisp raid Alpha, gain activity for themselves and the rest of the server. It's within their ID lines and their RP.

Taking this away from them will needlessly harm the faction. There is no positive enforcement, only negative.


Am, was there an actual fight or other proper activity?

No, because no Outcast or GC faction was willing to put up a healthy fight that would be beneficial in activity to both sides.


Excuse me, last fight with GC that I can recall was 2v2 (HF&VHF vs 2 VHFs). Well Outcasts are having their way.

[Image: loyolabully.gif]
[Image: Q5rd5YU.png]
Reply  
Offline Thyrzul
04-04-2016, 05:50 PM,
#49
The Council
Posts: 4,684
Threads: 115
Joined: Sep 2011

(04-04-2016, 05:46 PM)Protégé Wrote: No, because no Outcast or GC faction was willing to put up a healthy fight that would be beneficial in activity to both sides.

Happens when you catch lone transports in a fighter or bomber. I wouldn't call that healthy either.

[Image: OFPpYpb.png][Image: N1Zf8K4.png][Image: LnLbhul.png]
Reply  
Offline Corile
04-04-2016, 05:53 PM,
#50
C::iemka pl
Posts: 3,248
Threads: 267
Joined: Apr 2014

(04-04-2016, 05:50 PM)Sheekochan Wrote:
(04-04-2016, 05:46 PM)Protégé Wrote: quotes


Excuse me, last fight with GC that I can recall was 2v2 (HF&VHF vs 2 VHFs). Well Outcasts are having their way.

Okay, I stand corrected. That happened two times that I can recall. However if the line about engaging GC is removed, then those fights could not happen anymore.




Reflections on the Revolution in Gallia
Custodi // High City of Heraklion // The Cult of Archangels
Log Filter // Post Creator // Manhattan
  Reply  
Pages (8): « Previous 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode