• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community The Community Real Life Discussion
« Previous 1 172 173 174 175 176 … 245 Next »
Can you prove me wrong?

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Can you prove me wrong?
Offline Ocampo
01-21-2011, 03:23 AM,
#41
Member
Posts: 627
Threads: 89
Joined: Dec 2008

' Wrote:For these people:

Eunice Sanborn
Besse Cooper
Shige Hirooka
Dina Manfredini
Jiroemon Kimura
Ella Schuler
Delma Kollar

its 211 not 111.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oldest_people
I proved you wrong.

What do I win?

READ THE PART WHERE IS SAYS THE NOT TO OLD...

[Image: ocompoflattest.png]
<span style="color:#66FFFF"> Laws of the Republic of Liberty --- Liberty Criminal Database --- Liberty Capital Ship Registry --- Recruitment --- Trade Embargo --- Secondary Fleet Public Relations
</span>
Reply  
S.H.T.A.A
01-21-2011, 12:01 PM,
#42
Unregistered
 

A.Ocampo Wrote:READ THE PART WHERE IS SAYS THE NOT TO OLD...


A.Ocampo Wrote:This year we will experience 4 unusual dates: 1/1/11, 1/11/11, 11/1/11 and 11/11/11. Now, take the last 2 digits of the year you were born & add that number to the age you will be this year. The total should be 111 (except for the very young or old, in which case the number should be 11).

You edited your post and added "or old" after "except for the very young" in it after I proved you wrong, you sneaky little butt-hole.

In your foolishness, now you are saying that for both the very yound and very old the number is 11, which is STILL not correct. For people born between 1800 and 1899, the number is 211 and not 11.

So even after your attempt to cheat, I STILL prove you wrong there.

Now I want my prove-Ocampo-wrong prize.
Reply  
Offline Loken
01-22-2011, 11:57 PM,
#43
Phantom of Roussillon
Posts: 2,202
Threads: 80
Joined: Jun 2010

[Image: award-useless.gif]

[Image: NVY3f0y.png]
Reply  
Offline Ocampo
01-23-2011, 12:19 AM,
#44
Member
Posts: 627
Threads: 89
Joined: Dec 2008

' Wrote:You edited your post and added "or old" after "except for the very young" in it after I proved you wrong, you sneaky little butt-hole.

In your foolishness, now you are saying that for both the very yound and very old the number is 11, which is STILL not correct. For people born between 1800 and 1899, the number is 211 and not 11.

So even after your attempt to cheat, I STILL prove you wrong there.

Now I want my prove-Ocampo-wrong prize.

You did not prove anyone wrong since we established that would not work for pre 1900
Quote:1900: 00+111 = 111
1901: 01+110 = 111
1902: 02+109 = 111

etc

x = your age
y = year you were born in -1900; under condition that you were born pre-2000 and post-1899, and not born on February 29th

111-(x)=y

x+y=111


YOU LOSS

[Image: ocompoflattest.png]
<span style="color:#66FFFF"> Laws of the Republic of Liberty --- Liberty Criminal Database --- Liberty Capital Ship Registry --- Recruitment --- Trade Embargo --- Secondary Fleet Public Relations
</span>
Reply  
Offline Ocampo
01-23-2011, 12:20 AM,
#45
Member
Posts: 627
Threads: 89
Joined: Dec 2008

So no, you did not prove anyone wrong, just proved you did not read enough to make an intelligent post..



kthxbai

[Image: ocompoflattest.png]
<span style="color:#66FFFF"> Laws of the Republic of Liberty --- Liberty Criminal Database --- Liberty Capital Ship Registry --- Recruitment --- Trade Embargo --- Secondary Fleet Public Relations
</span>
Reply  
Offline Not Espi
01-23-2011, 12:24 AM,
#46
Member
Posts: 3,830
Threads: 130
Joined: Sep 2009

ok man you win.

now its my turn.


utilizing standard 1D calculus, premise: 2=2

prove me wrong.
Reply  
S.H.T.A.A
01-23-2011, 03:53 AM,
#47
Unregistered
 

A.Ocampo Wrote:You did not prove anyone wrong since we established that would not work for pre 1900

Well, you didnt say that in your orriginal post, for which you asked people to prove you wrong.

You just said strike the first 2 digits.

For people born before 1900 and still alive today, what you say doenst work.

The fact that you were not able to adequately formulate what you meant does not change the fact that what you said was wrong.

And now, I will proudly place the useless award in my sig, although you did not have the capacity to admit your defeat.

I hope you will grow to improve your character one day.

Until them, have nice ones.

P.S: btw.. your 4th grade math equations dont prove nothing, cause you dont prove that 111-x=y, you just postulate it and then act like you proved it, which you didnt.
Reply  
Offline Ocampo
01-23-2011, 04:19 AM,
#48
Member
Posts: 627
Threads: 89
Joined: Dec 2008

trolololololololololol:crazy:

[Image: ocompoflattest.png]
<span style="color:#66FFFF"> Laws of the Republic of Liberty --- Liberty Criminal Database --- Liberty Capital Ship Registry --- Recruitment --- Trade Embargo --- Secondary Fleet Public Relations
</span>
Reply  
Offline Daedric
01-23-2011, 06:57 AM,
#49
Member
Posts: 4,321
Threads: 111
Joined: Nov 2010

So when someone proves you wrong you can't admit it? Lame.

Interesting trick though, just proves math can be neat at times.

Helpful Discovery Guides

Get Help Here! | Player Base Guide | Mining Guide | Trading Guide
Reputation Guide | Zoner Rep Guide
[Image: 50px-OSILogo.png]
OSI Information | Join OSI! | Nichols Trade Center
OSI Bounty Board | OSI Feedback
Reply  
Offline ophidian
01-23-2011, 01:47 PM,
#50
Member
Posts: 1,421
Threads: 68
Joined: Jan 2009

82 + 29 = 111 =)

[Image: rand-back.png]
  Reply  
Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode