Honestly, I don't see how they were flaming you in any way. They were providing criticism to your roleplay and all you've returned was the equivalent of putting your fingers in your ears, yelling out "ALALALALALA I'M NOT LISTENING" and going on about how "Wisdom comes with age". You know, you keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.
The only things you're showing right now are immaturity, disrespect and arrogance. Furthermore, I would like to see the full chat logs.
Also, lose the avatar, and the picture for the Comtesse. It makes it even harder to take your RP seriously.
Could we please leave the man be? Ever think that per chance continuing to hound the man only causes more issues? He has some issues with other players, who hasn't? Let him work them out with those players. Quit going after him for the smallest little thing. It doesn't help the situation one iota.
Skullz. Samwich Rule, hombre. Go make one and eat it. Then maybe drink a fifth of vodka and come back. :laugh:
Too answer those that think I haven't excepted, or changed how I did the roleplay. I did thank you very much. It is rude to hound and constantly say that my opinion is wrong, in the manner of speaking of that those that I saw to continue to argue, argued in spite of what I had said. As well as claiming that I hate certain players to which I don't.
And respect. Am sorry, but I don't care about respect. If someone cannot, or does not wish to see my side then why should I talk to them. Nor do I go around acting like a puppy on a lead which it is what it feels like after the feedback from certain persons have said. And still after re-reading it all. I go by my gut instinct. I like straight facts/opinions. I like honesty. I show honesty. I give straight facts/opinions. I use my instinct. Obviously people will have a problem with that. But when they go about not willing to listen to oneself, why should they be taken seriously!!?
I have recieved the critism, I changed my roleplay. I asked why they do not see that the roleplay responses they gave were not what I thought it was. I get no understandable answer. I explain why I seen it that way, and I still don't get an understandable answer. Then they starting claiming things that I do not do, calling me names, labelling me and saying that I have a chip on the shoulder against one of the players whom replied to my orginial roleplay. To which I don't and did not even change the planned response as I made after seeing Alvins response, to which I left it for one day before I responded. In that time my planned response did not change at all. I see that as being rude, and of a bullying manner, thus flaming.
And nah, theres nothing that says I have to lose my avatar or anything else you have said. It's my choice not yours.
' Wrote:There is no rule stating he can't. It is up to the players playing the IMG, Liberty, & Bretonian counterparts if they wish to allow it.
An unofficial group taking down agreements which were signed by the official faction? I am not exactly sure that this is appropriate however there are no rules regarding that so I guess it's better to not continue as it won't end up anywhere.
@Skullz: You got my skype contact, in case you are interested in talking to me about the Curacao Treaty.
<strike>8. Provide Summits at Curacuo.</strike> It would seem to me that only a few are serious about this. Otherwise many more seem to be acting in a way as to provoke myself aswell as make direct disrespect of certain others, including myself too. For that reason I not be running on. Unless I gain direct support from a varity of players to stop metagaming, unwarranted provokations, unwanted abuse directed at certain Factions and unwarranted disrespect.
Updated part of oorp info.
@ Spacetime
Thank you very much for your input.
I disagree, namely because that Pan Galactic does not exist anymore. Secondly, I would assume, and have seen in history where a party that no longer is around that they are no longer with in the treaty. From my view point the treaty itself holds no current and Valid Leader for Orbital Spa and Cruise. In respect to that, I see that those others held with in the treaty believe it is still valid for Orbital Spa and Cruise. I am at the moment, since making the original post their, and may still be in the coming future, be looking at it to see the implications for Orbital Spa and Cruise. If I find it acceptable, I'll move to put my CEO characters signature on it. To stay with how those with in the treaty view how that OSC is still part of the treaty. Even when their is no voter for the treaty. Because there is no one from any OSC player group that is active that has signed it.
@ Markus_Janus
I'm sorry but saying it is to someone automatically means it is for that person only as per forum rules. I do not send an email to one person, only to find that 60 people has recieved it. I only put one address. I only put one address for those that I spoke to one person at a time.
I am not ranting. I am stating facts. Don't like them get lost.
Also Considering various Freeports are with in and near those Houses I would disagree. I would also go as far as saying that if one is with in a House such a message is transmittied that it will be recieveable by anyone that is a civilian. Since a Zoner is a civilian they would recieve it.
@ Markus_Janus
I'm sorry but saying it is to someone automatically means it is for that person only as per forum rules. I do not send an email to one person, only to find that 60 people has received it. I only put one address. I only put one address for those that I spoke to one person at a time.
I am not ranting. I am stating facts. Don't like them get lost.
Also Considering various Freeports are with in and near those Houses I would disagree. I would also go as far as saying that if one is with in a House such a message is transmitted that it will be receivable by anyone that is a civilian. Since a Zoner is a civilian they would receive it.
Ok fair enough so first off Zoners are not civilians of any house and you did specify, try and stay consistent.
Secondly have a look where the SCRA sent a message back to you, do you see the part that says private for your eyes only, no, neither do I.
Just because you send an email to one person does not mean you have control over their answer, they could make your original email public and respond so.
Look like it or not, you are having a rant.
You lost control of something and broke down, hence a rant, maybe a tantrum is a better word for it.
Like I tell my 12 year old child all the time, "just because people did not act the way you planned does not mean they are trying to provoke you, sorry kid your just not that important."
Now I will do as you ask and "get lost" for daring to have an opinion different from your unique perspective.:lol:
![[Image: YITahuf.png]](http://i.imgur.com/YITahuf.png)
![[Image: 50px-OSILogo.png]](http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d37/dannflyheit/Faction%20Icons/50px-OSILogo.png)
![[Image: NikashaJinkoOC1byInty.png]](http://i832.photobucket.com/albums/zz249/Natdhyde/NikashaJinkoOC1byInty.png)
![[Image: qz7DdPp.png]](https://i.imgur.com/qz7DdPp.png)