Login

Altejago · 08-04-2012, 01:43 AM,

' Wrote:I agree insofar as you're arguing with yourself as to the relevance of the irrelevance of an argument by arguing the irrelevance of its relevance in the first place and then inviting an irrelevant anti-argument, which, everyone knows could actually be a truly relevant argument only masquerading as an irrelevant anti-argument.

I say no. A thousand times no.

and sometimes, y

...except after c

The relevance of this question is not the point that we need to make in relation to the above aforementioned argument quoting that anti-arguments are relevant to any argument coherent in this debacle but to state that anyone here can argue the point if relevance was referred to them by means of some sort of previous argument stating that the size of your battleship bears no relevance to the point in this thread therefore becomes not an argument for the sake of arguing but of relevance to being noticed by other argumentative people referring to their skills in unrelated arguments or disputes that turn into hostilities leading to conflicts of many little pixels which in turn can make a player very angry about irrelevant things such as his inner self arguing how he lost a two minute fight in a big block of pixels and therefore in all relevance lost his ship which can be argued in such that it might be a significant loss of his pixelated game time which bears absolutely no relevance to this here argument.

Mr Angry.