• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Developers Forum Discovery Unofficial Development Discovery Mod Content Submissions
« Previous 1 … 10 11 12 13 14 … 28 Next »
Spatial Replace Updated with Texture preview

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Select your favorite cockpit design
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
1 White
23.73%
14 23.73%
2 Blue
11.86%
7 11.86%
3 Red
20.34%
12 20.34%
4 Green
44.07%
26 44.07%
Total 59 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Pages (9): « Previous 1 … 5 6 7 8 9 Next »
Spatial Replace Updated with Texture preview
Offline Trogdor
11-22-2013, 05:59 PM, (This post was last modified: 11-22-2013, 07:36 PM by Trogdor.)
#61
Member
Posts: 1,236
Threads: 64
Joined: Feb 2009

It looks boxy, bulky, not streamlined at all. The launch tubes make it look like a bomber, and the fuselage looks both strange (why is it curved?) and flimsy because the curve makes it thinner. For what's supposed to be a long-range exploration craft it looks like it has very little in the way of living quarters.

If you told me this was a Wilde bomber I'd believe it.

I much prefer the spatial we have now to this. At least, as far as the model is concerned.

[Image: i4h0ll.gif]
[Image: zonerzonerzoner.gif]
Reply  
Offline Druen78
11-22-2013, 06:55 PM,
#62
Member
Posts: 330
Threads: 17
Joined: Sep 2010

Aye, habitable space is an issue, it doesn't look like it would sustain prolonged travels. Hey, just forget about the Spatial and submit this as an entirely new ship Smile

I don't seed a signature.
Reply  
Offline Highland Laddie
11-22-2013, 07:08 PM,
#63
Member
Posts: 2,082
Threads: 21
Joined: Mar 2013

Moldy-Crow replacement, since that's another import? Or was that done away with already?
Reply  
Offline Thyrzul
11-22-2013, 10:02 PM,
#64
The Council
Posts: 4,684
Threads: 115
Joined: Sep 2011

(11-22-2013, 07:08 PM)Highland Laddie Wrote: Moldy-Crow replacement, since that's another import? Or was that done away with already?

Sounds okay. This model is way better already than the spiky version, but I somehow still feel it haven't reached the quality of DiscoFL ships, it's just a feeling, so I can't really elaborate on it yet. And the current Spatial is nice enough, plus fits the "Bird" line well, it is already replacing an import and there are still other imports in the mod to be replaced. One of those is the Moldy Crow. (Too bad Swallow just decided to leave, he had a good concept for the Kujira...)

[Image: OFPpYpb.png][Image: N1Zf8K4.png][Image: LnLbhul.png]
Reply  
Offline DartStriker
11-23-2013, 01:14 AM,
#65
Member
Posts: 906
Threads: 107
Joined: Jan 2010

If you think the model is of to poor quality for the mod, tell me why, just saying you have a feeling doesn't do m any good. However, I've seen some of the models in disco and as far as that mesh is concerned it is good enough for freelancer. Unless of course you see something wrong with the model that I do not.

[Image: 10850177_10205604867344576_7293107891114...g~original]
  Reply  
Offline Druen78
11-23-2013, 08:52 AM,
#66
Member
Posts: 330
Threads: 17
Joined: Sep 2010

Nah the model is superb Wink It's just that it doesn't really fit the role as a Spatial, at least in my and someone else's opinion. I think it would actually be too big and bulky for the Moldy Crow as well, but who knows, it could actually work fine instead.

I don't seed a signature.
Reply  
Offline DartStriker
11-23-2013, 03:21 PM,
#67
Member
Posts: 906
Threads: 107
Joined: Jan 2010

Druen I don't mind people thinking the model doesn't fit a particular role, most of the changes to this ship happened because of suggestions community members gave about their likes and dislikes. I just don't like people telling me the model isn't up to the standards of Discovery when it really just isn't up to their particular interest. Your comments are great, you expressed your opinion as an opinion, while I disagree its good to have as much input as possible.

[Image: 10850177_10205604867344576_7293107891114...g~original]
  Reply  
Offline Druen78
11-23-2013, 06:26 PM,
#68
Member
Posts: 330
Threads: 17
Joined: Sep 2010

Whenever I hear someone say "it's not detailed enough for Disco", all I can think is "Guys have you seen the BWTransport?" Big Grin Some of the models we currently have definitely show their age.

I don't seed a signature.
Reply  
Offline Haste
11-23-2013, 06:54 PM,
#69
Lead Developer
Posts: 3,580
Threads: 107
Joined: May 2012
Staff roles:
Balance Dev

(11-22-2013, 10:02 PM)Thyrzul Wrote:
And the current Spatial is nice enough, plus fits the "Bird" line well,

The question is, why does it fit this line? Large wings are made for planetary flight, I would assume. Why in the world would a long-range space explorer have large wings? Large engines and ample room for supplies / extended life support would make more sense.

It's too bland, in my view. This new model looks a lot more rugged and.. How I would image a Spatial deep-space explorer.

Edit: As for it looking like it doesn't have much 'space' inside, have a look at the cockpit. It's huge. It's more like a freighter/transport bridge than a fighter cockpit - which is exactly how it should be for a ship with a lot of living space.

Keep in mind even normal fighters are quite big compared to our pilot. I would assume those, too, have living quarters inside.

More edit: Also very importantly: more mass means it needs bigger engines (and consumes more fuel) in order to reach the speeds necessary to explore off the lanes. Logically, it wouldn't be too luxurious. To me, the Spatial should be rugged, not a luxury liner.

[Image: cdSeFev.png]
Reply  
Offline tothebonezone
11-23-2013, 07:00 PM, (This post was last modified: 11-23-2013, 07:00 PM by tothebonezone.)
#70
Banned
Posts: 1,016
Threads: 49
Joined: Mar 2013

[Image: Jj2APHB.png]

I'm disgusted by the head of this ship, just like I am with that of the old Firefly.

If you could make that something less.. Snake-y? Less banana-y? It'd be much nicer.

In my opinion anyway.

User was banned for: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=202684
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Pages (9): « Previous 1 … 5 6 7 8 9 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode