• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Role-Playing Unofficial Factions and Groups
« Previous 1 … 325 326 327 328 329 388 Next »
New Bundschuh Faction

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (11): « Previous 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next »
New Bundschuh Faction
Offline sovereign
01-18-2010, 04:34 PM,
#71
Member
Posts: 3,893
Threads: 38
Joined: Feb 2008

I don't think the Volksfront would mind becoming exactly what Trevelyan has in mind. Like I said earlier, the faction status needs de-Cawdor-ification if it hasn't gotten a healthy dose of it already.

If y'all are committed to the Bundschuh, you'd be best off merging up with the Volksfront even if you totally re-write the thing (please note that the faction status document and what they actually do are very different- like I said, it needs de-Cawdor-ification). Dragonego said he'd be talking to them, and I eagerly await seeing forward progress on that front.

Hell, I might even become active on it again.

Maybe. Small chance.

[Image: SCRAgenderheuristics.png]
  Reply  
Offline beander2
01-18-2010, 04:43 PM,
#72
Member
Posts: 759
Threads: 38
Joined: Mar 2008

' Wrote:I don't think the Volksfront would mind becoming exactly what Trevelyan has in mind. Like I said earlier, the faction status needs de-Cawdor-ification if it hasn't gotten a healthy dose of it already.

If y'all are committed to the Bundschuh, you'd be best off merging up with the Volksfront even if you totally re-write the thing (please note that the faction status document and what they actually do are very different- like I said, it needs de-Cawdor-ification). Dragonego said he'd be talking to them, and I eagerly await seeing forward progress on that front.

I think this is a very fair statement. And as much as I like Cawdor, I'd agree with that point, too.

Is the whole Gotteskanzler/cult-of-the-chancellor RP line still operative?

[Image: kbeb.png] Sir Alisdair Buchanan, KBE ~ Gateway)Trafalgar

[Image: Gateway-fin.png]
  Reply  
Offline Pinko
01-18-2010, 07:27 PM,
#73
Mr Onion
Posts: 3,189
Threads: 388
Joined: Jun 2009

' Wrote:Is the whole Gotteskanzler/cult-of-the-chancellor RP line still operative?

I think igiss said NO U to it.

I want to get off Mr. Igiss' wild ride.
Reply  
Offline beander2
01-18-2010, 07:42 PM,
#74
Member
Posts: 759
Threads: 38
Joined: Mar 2008

' Wrote:I think igiss said NO U to it.

Well, he said no, then he said yes. Has he said no again?

[Image: kbeb.png] Sir Alisdair Buchanan, KBE ~ Gateway)Trafalgar

[Image: Gateway-fin.png]
  Reply  
Offline Benjamin
01-18-2010, 08:28 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-18-2010, 08:30 PM by Benjamin.)
#75
Member
Posts: 1,794
Threads: 9
Joined: Jan 2009

Yeah, this is why I said amalgamate rather than just join a few pages ago. The VF is an ebb right now. It doesn't really have a leader (more just caretaking)

With dragonego's concerns for being stuck at recruit etc: I think this shouldn't be a concern. For one reason, Vrabcek, who is afaik the most active VF right now, is also the newest and pretty low rank, but this isn't a problem. Ranks don't really mean much unless you make them mean something. I don't think the VF restrict anything. Maybe they do on paper, but not in practice.

Anyway, there's been a lot of dissatisfaction in VF) skype with how the faction is at the moment. I think if you came in and helped us change it, it would be good for us and good for you.


edit: basically just saying, the VF) people are reasonable guys. If you say your piece there's every chance we can work something out.

Join Cryer Pharmaceuticals
Reply  
Offline beander2
01-18-2010, 09:48 PM,
#76
Member
Posts: 759
Threads: 38
Joined: Mar 2008

I'd say, though, that if there is a merger or amalgamation, it really does need to become "Bundschuh." No sense in having some renamed offshoot. Just do the real thing. Otherwise, it just seems like somebody's trying to do something different than "true Bundschuh."

Perhaps a major rethinking of the current faction, starting from the ground up, would be the best thing.

[Image: kbeb.png] Sir Alisdair Buchanan, KBE ~ Gateway)Trafalgar

[Image: Gateway-fin.png]
  Reply  
Offline Benjamin
01-18-2010, 09:59 PM,
#77
Member
Posts: 1,794
Threads: 9
Joined: Jan 2009

I'd agree with that. I don't like factions not named after the faction anyway.

Join Cryer Pharmaceuticals
Reply  
Lucas_Fernandez
01-18-2010, 10:09 PM,
#78
Unregistered
 

MND-[Kusari Naval Intelligence(?)]and now this. Someone give him a faction. :lol:

Pleaaaassseee let meee anddd adleeer leeeaaadddd! :crazy:
Reply  
Offline Pinko
01-18-2010, 10:15 PM,
#79
Mr Onion
Posts: 3,189
Threads: 388
Joined: Jun 2009

' Wrote:MND-[Kusari Naval Intelligence(?)]and now this. Someone give him a faction. :lol:

Pleaaaassseee let meee anddd adleeer leeeaaadddd! :crazy:

This wasn,t very helpful.

I want to get off Mr. Igiss' wild ride.
Reply  
Lucas_Fernandez
01-18-2010, 10:23 PM,
#80
Unregistered
 

' Wrote:This wasn,t very helpful.


Well we need much more your advices, it helped to AU growing up very much. This is what we need now too. :)
Reply  
Pages (11): « Previous 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode