• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 779 Next »
Why do you not like player owned bases

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard
Core Dominance - 0 / 10,000
Humanity's Defiance - 0 / 10,000
Nomad Ascendancy - 0 / 10,000
Order Mastery - 0 / 10,000

Latest activity

Pages (12): « Previous 1 … 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next »
Thread Closed 
Why do you not like player owned bases
Offline Toga
07-12-2023, 01:08 AM,
#81
Member
Posts: 44
Threads: 18
Joined: May 2016

POBs are a good thing and a bad thing. People spend way too much time worrying about them instead of roleplaying in game. Moderating something that takes time to build is difficult to do since some people no life a base until its fully done. Then another player who never wanted a POB in their space gets upset or doesn't like said person who built it, so they destroy it. Now the guy who built it is either going to do it again or say screw it and walk away and slowly have a grudge growing. We are all humans and reactions to a cause is normal, some people don't understand or can't understand it's just pixels and will ruin the game for others. I love the bases since they help with mining and such and also have an objective to help save them when they are being sieged or help destroying them. I don't like them because of how useless most bases are that people create. Honest opinion people who want to have a POB after X amount of time should be forced to request to keep it as a permanent station if only it has enough activity to prove a good addition. (This means these random bases floating in debris fields that people keep barely alive shouldn't exist)
Offline Wesker
07-12-2023, 01:12 AM,
#82
Level 99 Boss
Posts: 5,296
Threads: 457
Joined: Nov 2014

I siege one base after 5 years and everyone acts like i murdered children.

[Image: P6DLUCr.png?4][Image: AX5RcTh.png?4]
Offline Jeuge
07-12-2023, 01:18 AM, (This post was last modified: 07-12-2023, 01:19 AM by Jeuge.)
#83
EFL Squad
Posts: 560
Threads: 10
Joined: Jun 2019
Staff roles: Economy Developer

(07-11-2023, 06:29 PM)Hemlocke Wrote: When there are more POBs than average player pop.

I cri

Based
which also shows that Pob is an individual investment when it should be a collective one.
I'm sure some POB owners have 2-3 Pob on their own

[Image: 31OwWoq.jpg?1]
 
Offline Adam_Spire
07-12-2023, 03:56 AM,
#84
Member
Posts: 1,226
Threads: 219
Joined: Aug 2009

(07-11-2023, 09:15 PM)Toaster Wrote: You know, maybe building a station right next door to one of Sirius' most dangerous pirate / terrorist organizations was unwise. Maybe the result was predictable. Maybe the POB owner should have taken that into consideration, both in and out of roleplay.

Just a thought.

There was an agreed upon allowance by the SCRA to keep the station there.
The Base has existed there for nearly 2 YEARS
The SCRA, then wanting to have an excuse to blow something up, asked the hessians to initiate the attack to circumvent the agreement.
The SCRA Then pretend they have piles of evidence of House ships entering the base but provided none.

This had nothing to do with a violation of space. This was simply people wanting to blow up a players base.

I know it would have broken your heart to not blow something up, but you guys made your flimsy excuses, and did what you came to do.
Now , you have no reason not to do that to anyone else's station for further invented reasons.

[Image: azyu0u4.png]
Sometimes, when all you want is to gain your freedom, you must be willing to risk it all.
Offline Adam_Spire
07-12-2023, 04:00 AM,
#85
Member
Posts: 1,226
Threads: 219
Joined: Aug 2009

(07-12-2023, 01:12 AM)Wesker Wrote: I siege one base after 5 years and everyone acts like i murdered children.

And I'm sure you placed a well thought out, well detailed, understandable, and reasonable communications to the base owner, giving them every chance to either sell the base or demand a monthly cost fee, before opening fire.
As a "Story Developer" I am 100% sure used your skills to good use.

[Image: azyu0u4.png]
Sometimes, when all you want is to gain your freedom, you must be willing to risk it all.
Offline Shimamori
07-12-2023, 04:03 AM,
#86
Member
Posts: 430
Threads: 78
Joined: Jul 2020

(07-12-2023, 03:56 AM)Adam_Spire Wrote:
(07-11-2023, 09:15 PM)Toaster Wrote: You know, maybe building a station right next door to one of Sirius' most dangerous pirate / terrorist organizations was unwise. Maybe the result was predictable. Maybe the POB owner should have taken that into consideration, both in and out of roleplay.

Just a thought.

There was an agreed upon allowance by the SCRA to keep the station there.
The Base has existed there for nearly 2 YEARS
The SCRA, then wanting to have an excuse to blow something up, asked the hessians to initiate the attack to circumvent the agreement.
The SCRA Then pretend they have piles of evidence of House ships entering the base but provided none.

This had nothing to do with a violation of space. This was simply people wanting to blow up a players base.

I know it would have broken your heart to not blow something up, but you guys made your flimsy excuses, and did what you came to do.
Now , you have no reason not to do that to anyone else's station for further invented reasons.

Just to look at the RP that you linked as a proof of your "agreement" with the SCRA, you had an agreement with some indie, not even representing the faction. Figures, eh? Additionally, I remember the OC taking out IMG Core 5 POB in Tau 37 which had existed for 5 years. The history of a pob is no token of invulnerability. My POB has been deleted/rebuilt at least 4 times, last one being a complete meme being assaulted AND defended by the corsairs at a flimsy RP reason, yet you won't find any threads of our faction crying over it. Deal with the dead tamagochi, rinse and repeat if needed. Or build a Coalition/RH POB. Where there is a will, there is a way.

Biography | Reception Office | All Honshu Network | Honshu Stock Exchange | Jobs/Recruitment | Feedback | Discord
Offline Lemon
07-12-2023, 04:37 AM,
#87
The Legendary Lemon
Posts: 2,394
Threads: 114
Joined: Apr 2020

(07-12-2023, 04:00 AM)Adam_Spire Wrote:
(07-12-2023, 01:12 AM)Wesker Wrote: I siege one base after 5 years and everyone acts like i murdered children.

And I'm sure you placed a well thought out, well detailed, understandable, and reasonable communications to the base owner, giving them every chance to either sell the base or demand a monthly cost fee, before opening fire.
As a "Story Developer" I am 100% sure used your skills to good use.

This is a very good point - Core 3+ PoBs have to have good amount of roleplay deemed good enough/acceptable to get their blueprints, yet people can just do the /1/2 even not talking to them in RP, on factions that can't normally do that to transports. That even a story Dev does that is an extreme/sad example - but it should lead to changes faster. I've already proposed them in admin feedback thread, it won't change anything with e.g. nomad sieges, but is a mechanism that can be implemented literally tomorrow as the mechanics and logical points have been considered and worked out for many years.
Offline Greylock
07-12-2023, 05:43 AM,
#88
Buttcloaker Extraordinaire
Posts: 738
Threads: 72
Joined: Mar 2018

(07-12-2023, 04:37 AM)Czechmate Wrote: Core 3+ PoBs have to have good amount of roleplay deemed good enough/acceptable to get their blueprints,

Want to talk about the guy that has a couple dozen posts to his name with 2 core 3s and a core 4? Or the fact that the same guy at his peak stacked 8 PoBs on top of each other? Bases shouldn't need to be declared on for that very reason. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.



Though, to be fair, I wouldn't actually be surprised if you were actually the one responsible for that. It is the level of trolling you are known for.

Wesker, got an extra Jorm?

[Image: dqsrBM1.png]
Offline Couden
07-12-2023, 06:40 AM,
#89
Guardian of Tempest
Posts: 2,046
Threads: 162
Joined: Aug 2017

I have an extra Siege Tempest, @Greylock

[Image: 3XTkESZ.png]

Offline Couden
07-12-2023, 06:43 AM,
#90
Guardian of Tempest
Posts: 2,046
Threads: 162
Joined: Aug 2017

(07-11-2023, 11:19 PM)Saronsen Wrote: couden goes around flying lawful friendly ships in houses to find pobs without being harassed by local law enforcement then files a siege dec in what is one of the clearest cases of metagaming. im surprised couden hasnt eaten a ban

I am surprised I did that. If you have anythingthat proves it - send it to me

[Image: 3XTkESZ.png]

Pages (12): « Previous 1 … 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next »
Thread Closed 


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode