• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 311 312 313 314 315 … 780 Next »
About faction activity

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3
About faction activity
Offline Markus_Janus
08-03-2011, 12:18 AM,
#21
Gaijin Slayer
Posts: 1,949
Threads: 103
Joined: Jun 2008

I support Zuk's idea completely.
Also yeah it is not really a hinderance to exclusive ID's as all it takes is some admin help when putting up a replacement idea for them.

Samura Omotai Zaibatsu.
[Image: qz7DdPp.png]
Reply  
Offline jammi
08-03-2011, 12:20 AM,
#22
Badger Pilot
Posts: 6,891
Threads: 413
Joined: Aug 2007
Staff roles:
Story Dev
Economy Dev

' Wrote:I don't see it that way, if the SCRA falls below the threshold, someone else can put a proposal together.
Looks what happened to the Phooms. The Community is resistant to exclusive factions restarting once they've died off the once.

EDIT: The only reason any of them are allowed to exist now is the years of RP and heritage they've brought to the server. Can you honestly say you think a brand new SCRA would be allowed to start up tomorrow if the old one died?

[Image: redon.gif]
[Image: f0D5b.png][Image: O2Zu5.png][Image: IlS2I.png][Image: yNeaK.png][Image: 9zbjr.png][Image: D7RGg.png]
News article library, feedback and content requests.
Reply  
Offline Ayem
08-03-2011, 12:28 AM,
#23
Member
Posts: 796
Threads: 31
Joined: Mar 2008

I'm going to say yes, Jammi.

But then I'm biased.

[Image: greyscaleplanets.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline Loken
08-03-2011, 12:48 AM,
#24
Phantom of Roussillon
Posts: 2,205
Threads: 80
Joined: Jun 2010

This actually isn't a bad idea, it makes far more sense to me than the current system we have in place.

[Image: NVY3f0y.png]
Reply  
Offline Michael Trenton
08-03-2011, 02:49 AM,
#25
Member
Posts: 288
Threads: 20
Joined: Jun 2009

I agree to this - Although, I'm also in support of the one faction per I.D. and I hope that remains a rule.

'Nuff said.

[Image: 29d8ver.png]
Founder and Executive Consultant of
Universal Shipping Incorporated
Reply  
Offline mwerte
08-03-2011, 05:19 AM,
#26
Old Man
Posts: 4,049
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2007

' Wrote:Can you honestly say you think a brand new SCRA would be allowed to start up tomorrow if the old one died?
SCRA, yes, but the standards would be very high. Same with Das Wilde, Keepers, ect. HF and Phooms, probably not, as those are (were) legacy holdovers from a previous disco era, that don't mesh well with the current setup. SCRA, while being holdovers, do make sense in the universe.


  Reply  
Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode