More New Battleships for All Factions

[Zahas]

I would only accept more cruisers or battlecruisers or frigates.

[RmJ]

Less caps means less reasons for snubs, just saying.



Um yeah someone had mentioned it and I am glad they did, Hackers getting cap support is lultardable to me (Let Xenos get their own BS).


More caps? How about more of everything in general? Nah BS's are slugs bait. I would like to see a cruiser primed in variation for independent uses. As it stands now I designed 3 Frigate class vessels that are hybrids in stats (intentions of stats). But Jinx would have a cow about hybrid vessels.

But not to trail off to far I would say the number of BS's obtainable is enough or too much.

---

[Freestalker.fr]

Why new battleships?? Aren't they the King of the space? New Gunboats and Gunships? Yes. Destroyer and cruiser differenciation? Yes. More of these? Why not. Gunboats as Frigate, and Gunships in combination with Corvettes? I want! but Discovery creators don't think so. And more BCs and light carriers? It depends... But I don't think they want to add more thing without any good reasons.

[Stefz]

Nope.

If anything, there should be more fighters.

Hell yes! More fighters for each faction..

And NO, NO more caps.

---

[Stefz]

Why new battleships?? Aren't they the King of the space? New Gunboats and Gunships? Yes. Destroyer and cruiser differenciation? Yes. More of these? Why not. Gunboats as Frigate, and Gunships in combination with Corvettes? I want! but Discovery creators don't think so. And more BCs and light carriers? It depends... But I don't think they want to add more thing without any good reasons.

Dude, do you even realize how much time consuming would that be? It takes long enough to write infocards, not to talk about creating new ships. From models to hitboxes and textures..

---

[Pingu!]

Naaaaw... There's already too much battleships... More cruisers wouldn't hurt, though

---

But you either follow our rules here and work with us - or STFU and GTFO.

[jammi]

Dude, do you even realize how much time consuming would that be? It takes long enough to write infocards, not to talk about creating new ships. From models to hitboxes and textures..

You can crank out a good solid infocard in 5 to 10 minutes. It's the rest of the stuff that takes time.

---

News article library, feedback and content requests.

[Stefz]

You can crank out a good solid infocard in 5 to 10 minutes. It's the rest of the stuff that takes time.

Ye, rest of the stuff. As I already said: From models to hitboxes and textures..

---

[Lonely_Ghost]

I like this idea in general, but still, it wont make anything good in reall. The main problem is- many BS owners get used for ULTRA MINIMAL RP or just ignoring it. So more BS = more mad missile spawn (heh, like 4 Valors and Order Osiris along with them shoting 3-4 bomber in Alpha, and cant get single Redemption :lol:), more violations with caps, more situations like:
A:- Alright, capital targets down, lets mowe back to base fleet, docks awaiting for ships, beer and girls awaiting crew.-
A:-// Guys, stop shoting 3 fighters with 2 Dreads!-
B:- All caps, disengage at once, its fighters job now.-
A:-// Really, stop shoting them! You can hit our fighters!-
Blue death message: "Player name" was killed by (alied) "Player name" (on BS/Dread)
B:-// What are you doing? How many time need to say: DONT SHOOT MISSILES ON FIGHTER WHEN OUR FIGHTHERS NEAR!
D:- F** off guys, I want to finish thouse stupid fighters.
A:-//*Facepalm*
B:-//*Double Facepalm*

But yeah, lets make few types of bombers, at least normal one and heavy model with freighter sheild and 3rd Hard point for CD ( double snac would be great.... well, dont think that this gona happen:unsure:)

[CzeReptile]

Why not triple. Its not OP...

---