• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General News and Announcements
« Previous 1 … 30 31 32 33 34 … 46 Next »
Rules update 5.7 6.6 6.7

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (61): 1 2 3 4 5 … 61 Next »
Rules update 5.7 6.6 6.7
Offline Cannon
05-12-2012, 10:09 AM, (This post was last modified: 05-12-2012, 10:10 AM by Cannon.)
#1
Ex-server monkey
Posts: 4,530
Threads: 1,161
Joined: Mar 2008

Effective from the time of this post, the following rules have been updated. This is a trial for the next few weeks and may be changed further or possibly reverted.

The transport exception has been removed from rule 5.7.
Quote:5.7 A player who was killed in a PvP fight must not enter the system where the fight took place with any of the characters on his/her account(s) until four hours have passed from the time of his/her destruction.

If the player respawns in the same system, he/she must leave the system within 10 minutes of his destruction without attacking anyone, except in self-defense. Other players are not allowed to attack one who is leaving.

<strike>Transports/Freighters which have been killed in a PvP fight may return to the system in which they were destroyed but only for purposes of moving through the system or for trade within that system. They may only act in a purely defensive manner. This exemption applies only to players who are in the system for the purposes of trading and does not apply to mining, piracy or any other activity.</strike>
Rule 6.7 has been removed completely.
Quote:<strike>6.7 Attacking freighters and transports or demanding cargo or credits from the same is not allowed for cruisers and battleships.

Exceptions to this rule are:

a) Official faction tagged house ships in their respective house space or guard system ONLY.
b) Terrorist, Nomad, Wild, Phantom ID players;
c) LSF or Liberty Navy Guard IFF vessels operating within Zone 21 or Alaska;
d) Order Guard IFF vessels operating within Alaska or Omicron Minor;
e) Blood Dragon Guard IFF vessels within Chugoku;
f) Corsair Guard IFF vessels within Omicron Gamma;
g) Outcast Guard IFF vessels within Omicron Alpha;
h) Special OP players within the guidelines of their approved RP.

Traders whom are attacked in these areas may be pursued and destroyed beyond them.</strike>
Rule 6.6 has been updated to clarify that you can destroy a trade ship if it refuses to stop when asked to do so. Changes in bold.

Quote:6.6 Aggressors are not allowed to destroy a trade vessel prior to issuing a demand, in system or local chat, and allowing sufficient time to respond. Demands may be cargo, credits or an RP demand, such as leaving the system. "Halt" is not a demand. You must say more than this to ask a ship to stop however you may destroy them if they attempt escape

Proud member of "the most paranoid group of people in the community"
Old Avatar #2 | Old Avatar #3



Reply  
Offline Wraga
05-12-2012, 10:12 AM,
#2
Storm Chaser
Posts: 1,767
Threads: 260
Joined: Sep 2010

Welcomed from my side. All of them could make this thing more enjoyable.

[Image: giphy.gif]
  Reply  
Offline Snak6
05-12-2012, 10:12 AM, (This post was last modified: 05-12-2012, 10:12 AM by Snak6.)
#3
Banned
Posts: 405
Threads: 15
Joined: May 2012

Time for havoc. Space -is- dangerous.

User was banned for: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=138232
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline lw'nafh
05-12-2012, 10:13 AM,
#4
Member
Posts: 2,648
Threads: 115
Joined: Dec 2006

Wait. Transports can be pirated by warships...?

Ninja edit: And I can now destroy people for trying to escape if I give them adequate time/talky to stop as a pirate...? Yay.

вellυм ѕe ιpѕυм aleт
  Reply  
Offline Anomander
05-12-2012, 10:14 AM,
#5
Member
Posts: 3,272
Threads: 220
Joined: May 2010

k, noted - I see in my mind thousands pirate-battleships pirating all over the places, but hell! space is dangerous place.

plus no more oorp 'You can't kill me I'm transport - You battleship'

[Image: del0ff8-6ae63268-e37c-480b-a9a1-44137339...GwgitMB7x4]
<<< MuS|portfolio|RSF >>>
  Reply  
Offline ulfsarkhuskarl
05-12-2012, 10:14 AM,
#6
Member
Posts: 250
Threads: 17
Joined: Aug 2010

' Wrote:[b]
Rule 6.7 has been removed completely.
This means that now, cruisers and battleships are legal to pirate/demand cargo and shoot transports?

[Image: Dont_Flame.gif]
  Reply  
Offline Knjaz
05-12-2012, 10:15 AM,
#7
Member
Posts: 1,648
Threads: 80
Joined: Dec 2010

W.H.O.A.

That was.... unexpected.
Reply  
Offline Implosion
05-12-2012, 10:15 AM,
#8
Armed to the Teeth
Posts: 2,911
Threads: 166
Joined: Nov 2008

Sweeeeeeet.

[Image: Implosion90.gif]
| [Youtube Channel] | [Daniels] [X] [X]  | [Jessica Scarlet] |
  Reply  
Offline Govedo13
05-12-2012, 10:16 AM, (This post was last modified: 05-12-2012, 10:18 AM by Govedo13.)
#9
Member
Posts: 4,663
Threads: 97
Joined: Jul 2009

Time to pirate with cruisers- I can imagine the qq.
The shield option is a way better and I hope the trail would prove it, anyway good work.
It is nice to see the admin/dev team open for such changes.

€œ
(10-09-2013, 10:51 AM)Knjaz Wrote: Official faction players that are often accused of elitism, never deploy them and have those weird, immersion killing "fair fight/dueling" suicidal hobbies. (yes, i've seen enough of those lolduels, where house military with overwhelming force on the field willingly loses a pilot in a duel. ffs.)

Reply  
Offline Landers
05-12-2012, 10:17 AM,
#10
Member
Posts: 609
Threads: 43
Joined: Jul 2010

Meh.
Reply  
Pages (61): 1 2 3 4 5 … 61 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode