• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 230 231 232 233 234 … 547 Next »
4.86 shiplist + Images

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (53): « Previous 1 … 49 50 51 52 53 Next »
4.86 shiplist + Images
Offline schlurbi
12-11-2011, 02:09 AM,
#511
Member
Posts: 4,688
Threads: 187
Joined: Apr 2009

Stop arguing already. You're getting nowhere, the only Thing you are doing is making yourself look bad.

Also, stop pooping spiky Turds. >_>

"Who is it doing this synthetic type of alpha beta psychedelic funkin'?"
[Image: Newgoldensigfinishawesomecoolcolours.png]
  Reply  
SothaSil
12-11-2011, 06:52 PM,
#512
Unregistered
 

Quote:16. IMG Transport
http://img194.imageshack.us/i/hardpointe...10310.png/

So, is this a replacement for the current Atlas?
Reply  
Offline Rommie
12-11-2011, 06:59 PM,
#513
Member
Posts: 1,585
Threads: 46
Joined: Mar 2009

No, the current Atlas gets moved to CR, as a result of the split between us and IMG. All Atlases turn into the IMG Transport, and from then on, Atlases can only be bought with CR permission.

In space, nobody knows I'm a panda
Reply  
Offline Ursus
12-11-2011, 07:46 PM,
#514
Member
Posts: 3,853
Threads: 249
Joined: Oct 2011

wow glad I didn't buy an Atlas!


Discovery 24/7 Negotiating Tactics:

[Image: smuggler-threat-0-1.jpg]
Reply  
Offline Tachyon
12-11-2011, 09:47 PM,
#515
Freelancer for Life
Posts: 2,664
Threads: 53
Joined: May 2011

The new IMG shipline doesn't look very appealing to me, to be honest.

[Image: vJQQbhu.png]
Reply  
Offline Lumik
12-16-2011, 11:28 AM, (This post was last modified: 12-16-2011, 11:28 AM by Lumik.)
#516
Member
Posts: 366
Threads: 23
Joined: Sep 2011

If this was not mentioned here yet:

' Wrote:NB: The new Luxury Yacht, aka Admin Yacht, is not going into the mod; the GMS ships were also scrapped.

A lot of people will cry, new yacht was beatiful :(


[Image: fFZqBwL.png][Image: 0xCVMYl.png][Image: 1MoJa5S.png]

<> Information <> Recruitment <> Wanderlust Magazine <>
Reply  
Offline Hades
12-16-2011, 12:49 PM,
#517
Member
Posts: 513
Threads: 15
Joined: Aug 2008

' Wrote:The new IMG shipline doesn't look very appealing to me, to be honest.
That's probably because it's a rancid-looking shipline.

To put it nicely. : )))))
Reply  
Offline elrica
12-16-2011, 02:03 PM,
#518
Member
Posts: 325
Threads: 26
Joined: Mar 2011

' Wrote:The new IMG shipline doesn't look very appealing to me, to be honest.

I think that was the point. Everyone uses IMG ID for mining. As far as I've been told, the IMG transport has even less cargo-space now too. I understand the motives behind making the IMG shipline unappealing (similar to the motives behind what happened to the zoner whale), although I can't say I agree with it. It makes more sense to me to make the mining system more diverse, and make other mining factions more interesting from a relations standpoint, than coerce the playerbase by making certain shiplines horrible. Considering everything I've heard from the devs regarding the changes has been "we want players to choose who they want to RP, not which faction offers the best perks", the approach of making the perks more imbalanced strikes me as odd and contradictory.

Although, I might be misinformed about the cargo-space changes.
  Reply  
Offline Echo 7-7
12-16-2011, 02:18 PM,
#519
Masterful Modder
Posts: 4,077
Threads: 99
Joined: Sep 2006

' Wrote:The new IMG shipline doesn't look very appealing to me, to be honest.


I think it's more likely that since the CR get the Nyx/Pytho stuff, a new IMG line had to be made, so the ships we see here were made, and there were simply no better offers, or no other suggestions at all.

There was a sig here, once.
  Reply  
Offline Syrus
12-16-2011, 02:27 PM, (This post was last modified: 12-16-2011, 02:30 PM by Syrus.)
#520
Member
Posts: 1,583
Threads: 86
Joined: Mar 2010

The horrible looking transport-miner the IMG gets (and I thought people learned that a goose-style ship like the Firefly is not really what players want...) is a new addition. Therefore it's nice to have it, no matter if it looks very much like a goose with a weird egg thingy as its belly.

Losing the Atlas is sad though. It was one of the most horribly unagile transports of its size, but it had a CM and ok'ish defenses while still having a good cargohold (>4k is always good). The new ship also looks like a goose and loses the big cargohold. It isn't the worst ships I saw, but it still makes me sad that the IMG doesn't get anything more like the Atlas and looking a bit better.

The fighters on the other hand I like. They look like they should look. The previous CR-line (Nyx) might be good-looking, but imo they don't fit for IMG. Neither does the current Vampire-shot-style fit, but I heard that's going to be changed back to something closer to the vanilla look as well, which makes me very happy. The new fighter line looks more civilian again. And that's good. It looks like something a miner would build. I'm pretty sure they look alright ingame as well. Also, the IMG gets a Loki-like LF, capable of mounting and firing a mini razor. That's just awesome! I hope it won't be too big though...and not too slow. Well, I hope it will be overall well balanced. Same goes for the new VHF, it looks ok and I really hope it keeps with the previous style of (real) IMG fighters - the civilian Sirius line - and be agile like the eagle while sporting a similar core but maybe being a bit smaller. The bomber we get is a monster though, I guess. I heard it's going to be a very heavy one, like the Challenger or the Barghest. That will be interesting.
I can't say I dislike the CR-line, but I say they don't fit the vanilla IMG style which I loved so much - even though it was only given via their weapons (!). The biggest loss I must say which comes with .86 regarding IMG and CR is the Zephyr being scrapped as a flyable ship. It might not be a good ship in regards to combating other ships of the BS-size, but it still was one of the better looking ones out there.

Oh, and not to forget, I like how the new IMG BC looks. It's a bit weird, maybe, but still, not a bad looking ship. The cap turrets shot style (BS) I saw looked very good as well. Maybe a bit too red'ish though.

Overall I'm okay with the new shipline, except for the transports, those make me quite sad and I had hoped for something a bit more appealing to the eye and more usefull, as in having a bigger cargohold...


EDIT:
Forgot about the GB... really have to see that one ingame first before I judge it. It doesn't look good imo, at least from what I've seen. But heh, the CR GB also reminded me of a flip-flop all the time...

[Image: 7tAtSZe.png]
Reply  
Pages (53): « Previous 1 … 49 50 51 52 53 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode