• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 230 231 232 233 234 … 780 Next »
PvP quality

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (5): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
PvP quality
Offline ... kur nubėgo?
05-11-2012, 07:42 AM, (This post was last modified: 05-11-2012, 07:42 AM by ... kur nubėgo?.)
#11
Member
Posts: 3,019
Threads: 114
Joined: Jul 2008

' Wrote:. People tell me its about lag, but my ping is better here than on others.

It's because server side issues. Well, not always of course.

Omega Pirates Guild
History of OPG | Antonio "Vilkas" Devivar
Reply  
Offline McNeo
05-11-2012, 08:38 AM,
#12
Member
Posts: 3,424
Threads: 52
Joined: Aug 2006

At about 180 players is when the server starts latency really starts to climb. You can tell it's the server because:

1. Everyone starts complaining about lag at the same time.
2. It's consistently at this level, I've noticed, that fights start demanding better aim.

However, most lag you can deal with. Even in 200/200, if the server isn't going nuts over some base getting shot at, it's not too difficult to deal with. Sure, lag spoils a nice fight, but that really depends what you class as a "nice fight". Frankly, if you think of a slightly laggy fight as a "different" fight, rather than a "spoiled" one, you will be much better off - your aim gets better which helps you to deal with naturally laggy people who either live in South America (Casero mostly :3) or who lag for any other reason. You will also be better at predicting where people are going to be, since the circumstances will no longer show you this on your screen as folks shoot off into the distance.

Everybody else seems to moan about lag though. Truth is, CDs and missiles only really work when there's no latency on the server at all, which essentially means <80 players. I use CDs anyway, because I hate it when people run away and/or troll me all the way to the bank.
  Reply  
Offline lw'nafh
05-11-2012, 08:50 AM,
#13
Member
Posts: 2,648
Threads: 115
Joined: Dec 2006

I have a ping of about 400 most of the time, PvP is fine for me from a technical standpoint - usually.

However, gameplay wise, I find it really quite boring. In the time it takes for some fights to end I could have played 3 rounds of Counterstrike.

вellυм ѕe ιpѕυм aleт
  Reply  
Offline Syrus
05-11-2012, 09:07 AM,
#14
Member
Posts: 1,583
Threads: 86
Joined: Mar 2010

Wasn't Discovery 24/7 RP an RP server once?

PvP can be nice. I think the issue isn't mainly the lag itself, but the insane fighting speeds, which are so extremly influenced by that lag.

In yesterday's fight (Battle of FTU's Base) I must say there wasn't even much lag there during the first attack of the Mollys. Even while there were at least 20 or even more around. The second attack was also not too laggy at start, but I can't say much about it, as I died early.

Of course it would be nice if it wasn't laggy, but seeing how the server should be focussed on RP, it should be not a big deal. Maybe fights should be made slower so they aren't affected that badly by the slightest lag?

But heh. I guess noone ever liked lag, and this lag mostly isn't connection lag, but it seems to be more performance lag. At least when it comes to big battles and capship bumping.

[Image: 7tAtSZe.png]
Reply  
Offline lw'nafh
05-11-2012, 09:09 AM,
#15
Member
Posts: 2,648
Threads: 115
Joined: Dec 2006

' Wrote:Wasn't Discovery 24/7 RP an RP server once?

PvP can be nice. I think the issue isn't mainly the lag itself, but the insane fighting speeds, which are so extremly influenced by that lag.

In yesterday's fight (Battle of FTU's Base) I must say there wasn't even much lag there during the first attack of the Mollys. Even while there were at least 20 or even more around. The second attack was also not too laggy at start, but I can't say much about it, as I died early.

Of course it would be nice if it wasn't laggy, but seeing how the server should be focussed on RP, it should be not a big deal. Maybe fights should be made slower so they aren't affected that badly by the slightest lag?

But heh. I guess noone ever liked lag, and this lag mostly isn't connection lag, but it seems to be more performance lag. At least when it comes to big battles and capship bumping.
RP and PvP go hand in hand, problem is, the PvP aspect of RP is lopsided for people who have unpredictable internet connections.

вellυм ѕe ιpѕυм aleт
  Reply  
Offline Cond0r
05-11-2012, 12:49 PM,
#16
Member
Posts: 2,499
Threads: 42
Joined: Sep 2009

' Wrote:Wasn't Discovery 24/7 RP an RP server once?
because pvp isnt RP.

[17:23:05] Mini Me: pls
[17:23:06] Mini Me: gtfo
  Reply  
Offline lw'nafh
05-11-2012, 12:51 PM,
#17
Member
Posts: 2,648
Threads: 115
Joined: Dec 2006

' Wrote:RP and PvP go hand in hand, problem is, the PvP aspect of RP is lopsided for people who have unpredictable internet connections.


' Wrote:because pvp isnt RP.

One of the other issues is that people use the 'PvP is RP' argument as an excuse to act like twits.

вellυм ѕe ιpѕυм aleт
  Reply  
Offline Cond0r
05-11-2012, 12:53 PM,
#18
Member
Posts: 2,499
Threads: 42
Joined: Sep 2009

' Wrote:One of the other issues is that people use the 'PvP is RP' argument as an excuse to act like twits.
I am terribly sorry for not reading your post and thus making an exact one below/above, but shorter.

[17:23:05] Mini Me: pls
[17:23:06] Mini Me: gtfo
  Reply  
Offline lw'nafh
05-11-2012, 12:54 PM,
#19
Member
Posts: 2,648
Threads: 115
Joined: Dec 2006

' Wrote:I am terribly sorry for not reading your post and thus making an exact one below/above, but shorter.
No problem. I can smell the sarcasm from all the way down here in Australia.

:cool:

And you didn't really say what I said...

вellυм ѕe ιpѕυм aleт
  Reply  
Offline Cond0r
05-11-2012, 12:58 PM,
#20
Member
Posts: 2,499
Threads: 42
Joined: Sep 2009

' Wrote:No problem. I can smell the sarcasm from all the way down here in Australia.
I have never been more sincere in my life, believe you me.

edit: spiders

[17:23:05] Mini Me: pls
[17:23:06] Mini Me: gtfo
  Reply  
Pages (5): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode