• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 151 152 153 154 155 … 547 Next »
Galic civilian cruiser/expolrer

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (2): « Previous 1 2
Galic civilian cruiser/expolrer
Offline Trail
06-18-2013, 04:27 AM, (This post was last modified: 06-18-2013, 04:28 AM by Trail.)
#11
Member
Posts: 347
Threads: 21
Joined: Dec 2011

(06-16-2013, 11:28 AM)Thyrzul Wrote: We already have civilians using cruisers to explore. They are called Zoners.

Not to mention battleships (yes I kid you not this kind of RP happens more often then not)

[Image: xbabs0.jpg]
Reply  
Offline AeternusDoleo
06-18-2013, 05:22 AM,
#12
Ex-Developer
Posts: 5,744
Threads: 149
Joined: Nov 2009

Civilian and cruiser do not mix. From a devpoint, I'll simply not approve those. A gallic civilian gunboat is something I can get behind - both their lawful and unlawful factions could use one.

Wide awake in a world that sleeps, enduring thoughts, enduring scenes. The knowledge of what is yet to come.
From a time when all seems lost, from a dead man to a world, without restraint, unafraid and free.


Mostly retired Discovery member. May still visit from time to time.
Reply  
Offline Lonely_Ghost
06-18-2013, 08:52 AM,
#13
Member
Posts: 1,217
Threads: 48
Joined: Nov 2010

(06-18-2013, 05:22 AM)AeternusDoleo Wrote: A gallic civilian gunboat is something I can get behind - both their lawful and unlawful factions could use one.

Gallic analogue of Ahoudori?
Reply  
Offline Pavel
06-18-2013, 01:52 PM,
#14
On leave
Posts: 2,018
Threads: 197
Joined: Jan 2012

(06-18-2013, 05:22 AM)AeternusDoleo Wrote: Civilian and cruiser do not mix.



Thyrzul and Trail are right, we do have civilians using cruisers.

http://www.discoverygc.com/wiki/IMGC-104...tlecruiser
http://www.discoverygc.com/wiki/Corvo
http://www.discoverygc.com/wiki/Zoner_%2..._Destroyer
http://www.discoverygc.com/wiki/Artifici...Cruiser%29



P.S. Explanation "oh but they got Outcasts/Nomads to fight against" is really piss poor as house corporations got equally tough enemies yet they're treated like underdogs and get told "go make navy cap alts" by the admins. Allowing other civilians to anything about gunboat in that situation is creating double standard and messing with game balance. All three cap-wielding factions mentioned above can "go and make navy alts" as well.
Reply  
Offline SummerMcLovin
06-18-2013, 02:12 PM,
#15
Former Admin
Posts: 3,080
Threads: 73
Joined: May 2012

[01:56 PM] Pavel: hurr-durr, inb4 drama

[Image: emoticon-00133-wait.gif]

Moved to a more appropriate area.

Ok, ready now [Image: emoticon-00176-smoke.gif]

It's true (and I do agree) that you've got Colonial and Order caps to be "navy alts" for IMG and Zoners respectively. I wouldn't put AIs in the same category, but that's a fairly silly state of affairs anyway.
I said in the thread a couple of times (and more on Skype) for the new IMG ID to lose BSes as we'd heard was happening, guess AD still really likes that idea... Sagas, I don't have too much of a problem with but most use other types (Thannies) anyway. At least next version DHC (and Kruger) won't have Hessians engaging them right off the mark, and with a fix to O-11 it should be a bit easier anyway.
As for Zoners (I see Tel-Aviv is probably getting ready to strike), I guess they would be handled or ignored as the whole indy caps debate - all or nothing, too much power for indies etc.

Kingdom of Bretonia
Colonial Republic
Independent Miners Guild
Ex-Admin
Reply  
Offline Knjaz
06-19-2013, 08:45 AM, (This post was last modified: 06-19-2013, 08:47 AM by Knjaz.)
#16
Member
Posts: 1,648
Threads: 80
Joined: Dec 2010

I can tell you that the way it looks, (if it's indeed a small cruiser) it'd be used by RNS-, primarily. (that is, if current Obstinate stats will stay the same - but they wont, afaik)
Reply  
Offline Timmy
06-19-2013, 09:34 AM, (This post was last modified: 06-19-2013, 09:41 AM by Timmy.)
#17
Probation
Posts: 995
Threads: 128
Joined: Jan 2012

How about not doing this thing, and also remove all zoner capital ships which make no sense in general?

That juggy, as people say meant to be colony ship iRP, but it's used for battles, which zoners trying to avoid as far as I know. That carrier makes no sense at all either. Well, maybe a little, but still it's not something that should be equipped for fight. And that deep space explorer that basicaly one of most OP cruisers on discovery...

Seriously, make them all transport or liner class, then they will be used for the purpose they meant to be used by factions or indies who wanna RP rather then pew.
Reply  
Offline Sabru
06-20-2013, 07:58 AM,
#18
Member
Posts: 2,274
Threads: 262
Joined: Jan 2012

(06-19-2013, 09:34 AM)McTemka Wrote: How about not doing this thing, and also remove all zoner capital ships which make no sense in general?

That juggy, as people say meant to be colony ship iRP, but it's used for battles, which zoners trying to avoid as far as I know. That carrier makes no sense at all either. Well, maybe a little, but still it's not something that should be equipped for fight. And that deep space explorer that basicaly one of most OP cruisers on discovery...

Seriously, make them all transport or liner class, then they will be used for the purpose they meant to be used by factions or indies who wanna RP rather then pew.

dont blame all zoners, for the actions of ***** indies and one fractious unofficial faction full of clueless people.
though discussionS have been had about how to limit any lolcaps. One suggestion was official zoner factions (TAZ, OSI, Phoenix) were the only ones who had access to proper cap ships and limit indies to GBs.

[Image: 9KgNaeX.png]
Reply  
Offline Timmy
06-20-2013, 08:11 AM,
#19
Probation
Posts: 995
Threads: 128
Joined: Jan 2012

(06-20-2013, 07:58 AM)Sabre Wrote: dont blame all zoners, for the actions of ***** indies and one fractious unofficial faction full of clueless people.
though discussionS have been had about how to limit any lolcaps. One suggestion was official zoner factions (TAZ, OSI, Phoenix) were the only ones who had access to proper cap ships and limit indies to GBs.

I don't blame all zoners, I just say that some, as you said "***** indies" use caps as they like. And as about your suggestion, I would suggest to do this in all factions. That would at least make any use of joining and even making them.
Reply  
Offline Thyrzul
06-20-2013, 10:11 AM,
#20
The Council
Posts: 4,684
Threads: 115
Joined: Sep 2011

(06-20-2013, 08:11 AM)McTemka Wrote:
(06-20-2013, 07:58 AM)Sabre Wrote: dont blame all zoners, for the actions of ***** indies and one fractious unofficial faction full of clueless people.
though discussionS have been had about how to limit any lolcaps. One suggestion was official zoner factions (TAZ, OSI, Phoenix) were the only ones who had access to proper cap ships and limit indies to GBs.

I don't blame all zoners, I just say that some, as you said "***** indies" use caps as they like. And as about your suggestion, I would suggest to do this in all factions. That would at least make any use of joining and even making them.

This. Definitely this.

[Image: OFPpYpb.png][Image: N1Zf8K4.png][Image: LnLbhul.png]
Reply  
Pages (2): « Previous 1 2


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode