• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 167 168 169 170 171 … 779 Next »
Capital Ships and the Future of Discovery RP 24/7

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (18): « Previous 1 … 11 12 13 14 15 … 18 Next »
Capital Ships and the Future of Discovery RP 24/7
Offline Sirius.Kane
06-30-2013, 01:02 PM,
#121
Member
Posts: 42
Threads: 8
Joined: Oct 2012

I'd say - you restrict battleships - you restrict gameplay - you reduce big batlles count - you lose a thousand people.

End of disco Tongue
Reply  
Offline Anaximander
06-30-2013, 01:15 PM, (This post was last modified: 06-30-2013, 01:16 PM by Anaximander.)
#122
Member
Posts: 1,261
Threads: 62
Joined: Jun 2012

Ye, again it's the players not the caps and this discussion do more harm than good.

Try going to Tau-23 in an Outcast cruiser - people feel justified to jump you 5-6 bombers on one Cruiser and still maintain that you are the one "ganking" because you piloted a cap...

People need to get their heads out of their behinds and realize that caps are pretty weak in Disco, it doesn't take more than 2-3 nova-spamming bombers to bring one down (4 if you want a no-contest / no bats or bots lost your side).

Cap pilots are not "bad people" or "lolwuts" by default, rather it's those that assume that cap pilots are idiots (or at least every other cap pilot than themselves and their friends) that are the true "lolwuts".
Reply  
Offline Sirius.Kane
06-30-2013, 01:21 PM,
#123
Member
Posts: 42
Threads: 8
Joined: Oct 2012

Exactly, you wanna restrict a game so much ... why?

It's just a game after all - meant to be fun at all costs (Except breaking rules) you nerd.
Reply  
Offline belarusich
06-30-2013, 01:30 PM,
#124
Member
Posts: 955
Threads: 57
Joined: Dec 2012

Quote:They just forget that they could use the basic shield multiplication to reduce the effect, assiging the Razors and Pulses in group that do only certain % damage vs certain class shield type fixes it.
Shield based balance can change the server for good by individually shaping each class without having the second thoughts and flaws like now. Now one snub can make brutal amount of damage to any cap using its guns- one MR shot 3 -4 times do almost the same Damage as Snac but the fighter can dodge better meanwhile. If the cap shield absorbs let say 50% of the damage then fighters wont be any danger for caps.
The list can include all kind of ship classes vs all kind of ship classes.
Quite easy actually.

And how to change reduction % on shields?

http://i.imgur.com/kUwDiuk.jpg
more than 1 kill per minute in shooter is cheating now :\
Signature must not be larger than 700x250 pixels
Codes from your picture have been removed.
~ Dim
Reply  
Offline Thyrzul
06-30-2013, 01:46 PM, (This post was last modified: 06-30-2013, 05:43 PM by Thyrzul.)
#125
The Council
Posts: 4,684
Threads: 115
Joined: Sep 2011

(06-30-2013, 01:15 PM)Anaximander Wrote: Ye, again it's the players not the caps and this discussion do more harm than good.

Aaaaaand restricting cap usage would pretty much effect the players, not the caps. I wonder how many times will I need to repeat myself on this in the future.

(06-30-2013, 01:15 PM)Anaximander Wrote: People need to get their heads out of their behinds and realize that caps are pretty weak in Disco, it doesn't take more than 2-3 nova-spamming bombers to bring one down (4 if you want a no-contest / no bats or bots lost your side).

Guess what, caps are balanced to be killable this easily because there are many of them out there because everybody and their mom can fly one. Make them more rare, buff them to realistic strenghts and your problem is gone already.

(06-30-2013, 01:15 PM)Anaximander Wrote: Cap pilots are not "bad people" or "lolwuts" by default, rather it's those that assume that cap pilots are idiots (or at least every other cap pilot than themselves and their friends) that are the true "lolwuts".

Cap pilots are not lolwuts, I don't want to get rid of ALL caps, rather it's those who fly caps only for the lulz and give no crap about RP. Well, THOSE are lolwuts, yes, who fly Nephs in Manhattan orbit, who fly legates on the edge of Gallia... those are lolwuts in my book. And just because I'm saying this, that won't make me a lolwut instead of them, that's a weak argument. (That's like saying "NO U!".)

[Image: OFPpYpb.png][Image: N1Zf8K4.png][Image: LnLbhul.png]
Reply  
Offline Sirius.Kane
06-30-2013, 01:51 PM,
#126
Member
Posts: 42
Threads: 8
Joined: Oct 2012

All we need is for those people, who fly caps to be mature and explain everything to them so no lolwuttery will happen.
Not restrict capitals.
Reply  
Offline Thyrzul
06-30-2013, 01:55 PM,
#127
The Council
Posts: 4,684
Threads: 115
Joined: Sep 2011

(06-30-2013, 01:51 PM)Sirius.Kane Wrote: All we need is for those people, who fly caps to be mature and explain everything to them so no lolwuttery will happen.

Good luck with that then.

[Image: OFPpYpb.png][Image: N1Zf8K4.png][Image: LnLbhul.png]
Reply  
Offline Anaximander
06-30-2013, 02:17 PM,
#128
Member
Posts: 1,261
Threads: 62
Joined: Jun 2012

I'm all for nerfing the trade system, it's bloated. There's your restriction.

You keep saying that some people are better fit to pilot these ships, Thyr'Zul, but how do you expect to make a reasonable and fair selection?
Reply  
Offline Thyrzul
06-30-2013, 02:24 PM,
#129
The Council
Posts: 4,684
Threads: 115
Joined: Sep 2011

(06-30-2013, 02:17 PM)Anaximander Wrote: You keep saying that some people are better fit to pilot these ships, Thyr'Zul, but how do you expect to make a reasonable and fair selection?

Grant the final words the ones who were the major decision-makers in other (quality) roleplay related stuff. Admins review and accept or deny Official Faction applications, Admins review and accept or deny SRP requests, why couldn't they do the same?

What issue I could see here is that this specific subject may give more work to them as the other two things I mentioned, but I can imagine this issue being solved with appointing people to help in making decisions whom the Admins can trust.

[Image: OFPpYpb.png][Image: N1Zf8K4.png][Image: LnLbhul.png]
Reply  
Offline Anaximander
06-30-2013, 02:28 PM,
#130
Member
Posts: 1,261
Threads: 62
Joined: Jun 2012

It's too narrow a circle of people deciding and you'll be robbing players of some of that freedom they go here to enjoy.

Great way to cut server population though, I know I'd probably throw in the towel if I had to get on my hands and knees to beg admins or "trusted players" for the right to pilot a ship that I see myself just as fit to fly and roleplay as they are.

This anal retentiveness will suck the fun out of the game.
Reply  
Pages (18): « Previous 1 … 11 12 13 14 15 … 18 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode