• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 159 160 161 162 163 … 779 Next »
Proposal: Remove Battleships from the Zoner ID.

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (33): « Previous 1 … 14 15 16 17 18 … 33 Next »
Proposal: Remove Battleships from the Zoner ID.
Offline Echo 7-7
08-22-2013, 01:31 PM, (This post was last modified: 08-22-2013, 01:40 PM by Echo 7-7.)
#151
Masterful Modder
Posts: 4,077
Threads: 99
Joined: Sep 2006

(08-22-2013, 01:13 PM)SMI-Great.Fox Wrote: I still think replacing the Nephilim with a vessel that wont be misused would simply be easier and create less QQ...

From a technical perspective, the ship could potentially be repurposed into a transport-class ship, simply by adjusting the ship stats and equipment hardpoints. Or we could just gut the ship's stats to oblivion, making it useless in combat.

However, the Nephilim need not have any changes made to it whatsoever, provided the Zoner ID has Battleships removed from it altogether. This would still necessitate some kind of limitation or adjustment to its availability, though - it'd be a bit odd having Nephilims sold at the Zoner shipyard yet the Zoner ID not permitting battleships. (Nephilims: Coming to a TAZ-only shipyard near you?)
[/personal opinion]

Edit:

(08-22-2013, 01:13 PM)Katherine Wrote: 1.it's not about fighters being able to travel and carrie the necessary supplies for a period of time,it's about..well..living in car for a few weeks/months without being able to move,etc..
...

You do realise even a ship as small as a Light Fighter has the interior capacity comparable to the size of a minivan?

There was a sig here, once.
  Reply  
Offline Zen_Mechanics
08-22-2013, 02:16 PM,
#152
Member
Posts: 2,262
Threads: 196
Joined: Oct 2012

Ok let's remove the hellfire legion's cap and replace it with my fave craft
Also, because many people lulz with Liberty cap we should also remove them and make them SRP ~ Red hessians dont have that much "influence" to have a battleship that size, so it should also be converted to a transport size - perhaps gunboat at best. Now, is that the philosophy you project here?

Were fools to make war on our brothers in arms.

Reply  
Offline Echo 7-7
08-22-2013, 02:30 PM, (This post was last modified: 08-22-2013, 02:32 PM by Echo 7-7.)
#153
Masterful Modder
Posts: 4,077
Threads: 99
Joined: Sep 2006

(08-22-2013, 02:16 PM)Tel-Aviv Wrote: ... is that the philosophy you project here?

No, I'm just here because I have a vendetta against Zoners.

[/sarcasm]

(Resorting to ad-hominem attacks really does reinforce that you are unable to discuss this topic objectively.)

There was a sig here, once.
  Reply  
Offline Zen_Mechanics
08-22-2013, 02:36 PM,
#154
Member
Posts: 2,262
Threads: 196
Joined: Oct 2012

Maybe if zoners didnt get so much attention I wouldn't comment like that, but granted I see the same people at the same thread, weekly-going threads, Yes it does look like a personal attack. I wonder where those self-rightousss "know-it-all" towards other factions, ya know, like colonials perhaps? Or maybe red hessians? You have to wonder now don't you?

Were fools to make war on our brothers in arms.

Reply  
Offline t0l
08-22-2013, 02:40 PM,
#155
Space Operator
Posts: 1,827
Threads: 134
Joined: Feb 2013

(08-22-2013, 02:16 PM)Tel-Aviv Wrote: Ok let's remove the hellfire legion's cap and replace it with my fave craft
Also, because many people lulz with Liberty cap we should also remove them and make them SRP ~ Red hessians dont have that much "influence" to have a battleship that size, so it should also be converted to a transport size - perhaps gunboat at best. Now, is that the philosophy you project here?

Why are you trying to tiptoe around the subject at hand? The topic we are discussing are Zoner battleships, not the removal of LNS indies or RH Jorms.

Are you trying to pull the "We're screwed anyway, so if I can't have battleships, no one can"?


Anyways, my two cents here is that yes, Zoners don't need battleships. I'm content with a Corvo or a Fearless, and Zoners wouldn't have the materials to build such a massive, heavy battleship. Maybe let each faction have 1 SRP'd Juggie to act as a "flagship".

On a similar note, what would we do about the Aquili-- whatever Carrier?

[Image: PFjFVMW.png]
Reply  
Offline Anaximander
08-22-2013, 02:42 PM, (This post was last modified: 08-22-2013, 02:42 PM by Anaximander.)
#156
Member
Posts: 1,261
Threads: 62
Joined: Jun 2012

@Tel-Aviv

You are, of all people, worried about Zoners getting a lot of attention? Big Grin

You've done a tremendous effort in exposing the flaws of the Zoner ship line, lore and ID and made it painfully obvious that PoB's need to get changed somehow. You've single-handedly achieved more in that department than dozens of zonerzonerzoner threads over the years.

Kudos for that by the way.
Reply  
Offline Echo 7-7
08-22-2013, 02:50 PM, (This post was last modified: 08-22-2013, 02:59 PM by Echo 7-7.)
#157
Masterful Modder
Posts: 4,077
Threads: 99
Joined: Sep 2006

(08-22-2013, 02:36 PM)Tel-Aviv Wrote: Maybe if zoners didnt get so much attention I wouldn't comment like that, but granted I see the same people at the same thread, weekly-going threads, Yes it does look like a personal attack. I wonder where those self-rightousss "know-it-all" towards other factions, ya know, like colonials perhaps? Or maybe red hessians? You have to wonder now don't you?

Both the Red Hessians and the Colonials have a more acceptable basis for manufacturing their own capital ships than the Zoners.

Hessians:
- Abundant resources
- Large labour force
- Some multi-purpose manufacturing facilities
- Moderate technical expertise, some second-hand knowledge

Colonials:
- Moderate resources
- Small but well-organised labour force
- Few manufacturing facilities, but specialised
- Limited but modern technical expertise, mostly first-hand knowledge

Zoners:
- Resources dependent on region, extreme distribution
- Labour force focussed on self-sustenance, not attempting to expand
- Extremely limited manufacturing facilities
- No standard technical expertise, fluctuating between individuals.


Addendum:

The first two factions have distinct, organised fighting forces. Zoners do not. At most, Zoners might form a militia dedicated to the defense of their homes, a single freeport.


Bear in mind that this thread is not for the discussion of other factions: It is focussed solely on the merits (and lack thereof) of the Zoner ID and Battleships.

There was a sig here, once.
  Reply  
Offline Black Widow
08-22-2013, 02:51 PM,
#158
Totally no longer on probation
Posts: 2,351
Threads: 230
Joined: Jun 2008

(08-22-2013, 01:13 PM)SMI-Great.Fox Wrote: I still think replacing the Nephilim with a vessel that wont be misused would simply be easier and create less QQ...

I dont really understand that?

Your saying remove Zoner Battleships because it might be misused and replace with something weaker, Why? To neuter the ZA or for some other reason like curing your QQ headache?

Let me ask what if a faction similar to the ZA but using a BAF ID decided to start doing the same thing, ie lockdown a system and create pew and headaches for everyone then by your logic, we should remove BAF Battleships and replace them with something weaker? No, that is a big fail.

If you cannot deal with ZA inRP then that is the failure of all those who oppose them as they cannot remove them by show of force or diplomacy.

To then try and deal with the ZA problem by removing their BS's so they have nothing to defend their bases with is wrong, plain wrong as that is what people here are trying to do.
Reply  
Offline Sabru
08-22-2013, 02:52 PM,
#159
Member
Posts: 2,274
Threads: 262
Joined: Jan 2012

(08-22-2013, 02:42 PM)Anaximander Wrote: @Tel-Aviv

You are, of all people, worried about Zoners getting a lot of attention? Big Grin

You've done a tremendous effort in exposing the flaws of the Zoner ship line, lore and ID and made it painfully obvious that PoB's need to get changed somehow. You've single-handedly achieved more in that department than dozens of zonerzonerzoner threads over the years.

Kudos for that by the way.

i agree with anaximander again? what is up with the world? Big Grin

[Image: 9KgNaeX.png]
Reply  
Offline Zen_Mechanics
08-22-2013, 02:54 PM, (This post was last modified: 08-22-2013, 02:57 PM by Zen_Mechanics.)
#160
Member
Posts: 2,262
Threads: 196
Joined: Oct 2012

I would simply say ~ just for the shere fact that zoners work with the baby eaters and actually hold them in their pocket ( and you can argue about it as much as you want, food is just as powerful as a battleship ) - coming up with an idea of how zoners can have battleships, well sairs would be a good place to start work on - However, point blank, Disco made the caps, vannila didn't - if the arguement goes to "who can and who cannot" - Vanilla wise, no one - apart from house factions can have such crafts, so once we dismiss one edgeworld faction we might as well dismiss them all.

Oh and just a little reminder : I never said Im against it, im not grounded on it - but telling me its ok to remove zoner caps because someone has just said " its been lol-lazy-wutty" is just NOT GOOD ENOUGH. Right now its all about piling all the stuff that can make sense to the first arguement, looking for every possible flaw to add more and more - It's ridiclious.

Were fools to make war on our brothers in arms.

Reply  
Pages (33): « Previous 1 … 14 15 16 17 18 … 33 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode