• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General News and Announcements
« Previous 1 … 26 27 28 29 30 … 46 Next »
Admin Notice: System Classification and Faction ZoIs

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (5): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Admin Notice: System Classification and Faction ZoIs
Offline Zelot
11-10-2013, 07:07 PM,
#31
Member
Posts: 7,539
Threads: 379
Joined: Jun 2007

(11-10-2013, 07:02 PM)Lonely Werewolf Wrote:
(11-10-2013, 06:41 PM)Zelot Wrote: It is the difference between nationalist terrorism and and what might be called religious or ideological terrorism. Al-Queda or Hezbollah don't have a single country they are affileated with or are protecting. Look more along the model or nationalist terror groups and you will find the roots of the Xenos. The KKK in the US, the Basque movement in Southern France and Northern Spain, The Tamel Tigers of Sri Lanka, The Irgun and Lehi in British Mandatory Palistine, and the IRA in Ireland.

These groups are and were nationalist terrorist orginizations and they were and are focused on liberating or causing specific conditions in a specific area. These group are much more consistant with the Xenos than Al-Queda groups would be. These groups wouldnt go looking for a fight that does not have to do with it's goals and is not in it's area. British companies go into Southern France and Northern Spain all the time, but that doesnt mean the Basque would target them all in England and certainly not all over the world.

Looking at the Xenos as some kinda Al QUeda terror group is totally misunderstanding the Xenos.

A very fair point. I admit my knowledge of Xeno RP isn't my strong point. However I still think there's room for people who want to RP an element of the Xenos who decide to hit shipping etc in Kusari space before it hits Liberty is an option.

And when the Xenos are in Kusari? Who does their work in Liberty? The Xenos are not a huge group. For everyone in Kusari, there is a Bretonian or other transport heading into Liberty.

[Image: 13121_s.gif]  
Reply  
Offline Dusty Lens
11-11-2013, 12:35 AM, (This post was last modified: 11-11-2013, 12:49 AM by Dusty Lens.)
#32
Member
Posts: 6,664
Threads: 438
Joined: Dec 2007

I'm very happy to see that the development team is recognizing that Kusari's isolationist policies, the meta isolationist policies to be specific, are at their best when being rattled. A modest allowance in engagement zones to be sure, but a poignant message to persons who demand that their sandboxes, and jimmies, remain rustled at all costs.

On that same token this might serve as a very good time to review some of those arguments raised in a new light! Much of the evidence supporting these same meta isolationist positions were drafted and approved by the same parties that use them as a point of debate. Rather than serving as evidence for restricting game play in a perpetually troubled region of the game they could, perhaps, stand as evidence against their inclusion in the contemporary story line.

Afterall, people don't login for infocards. They use them to support a larger narrative foundation to be sure but that doesn't pay the bills when confronted by a multitude of empty systems populated by the same eight people wearing every mask in the land.

P.S. Sina says GOODBYE.
Reply  
Offline Omi
11-11-2013, 02:29 AM,
#33
By Unpopular Demand
Posts: 1,716
Threads: 87
Joined: Aug 2007

About the whole Xenos in Shikoku thing, and tons more besides:

Why is more choice a bad thing? You're not obliged to ever visit Shikoku just because your ID says you can. Then again, I think the whole idea of a strict, ID-bound ZoI system is unnecessary and rather silly. The old method of common sense mixed with the little "your system's NPCs +1" was far better.

[Image: omicega.gif]
Reply  
Offline Zelot
11-11-2013, 08:46 AM,
#34
Member
Posts: 7,539
Threads: 379
Joined: Jun 2007

(11-11-2013, 12:35 AM)Dusty Lens Wrote: I'm very happy to see that the development team is recognizing that Kusari's isolationist policies, the meta isolationist policies to be specific, are at their best when being rattled. A modest allowance in engagement zones to be sure, but a poignant message to persons who demand that their sandboxes, and jimmies, remain rustled at all costs.

On that same token this might serve as a very good time to review some of those arguments raised in a new light! Much of the evidence supporting these same meta isolationist positions were drafted and approved by the same parties that use them as a point of debate. Rather than serving as evidence for restricting game play in a perpetually troubled region of the game they could, perhaps, stand as evidence against their inclusion in the contemporary story line.

Afterall, people don't login for infocards. They use them to support a larger narrative foundation to be sure but that doesn't pay the bills when confronted by a multitude of empty systems populated by the same eight people wearing every mask in the land.

P.S. Sina says GOODBYE.

Really not sure what that argument has to do with any of the arguments made previously in the thread. Then again, I am usually not smart enough to understand your arguments. Would you care to dumb it down for pitiful ole me?

[Image: 13121_s.gif]  
Reply  
Offline SnakThree
11-11-2013, 08:51 AM,
#35
Member
Posts: 9,091
Threads: 337
Joined: Mar 2010

So, let's say, Isejins in Magellan are out of their ZoI? Or is Magellan now the new Conn?

[Image: rTrJole.png][Image: LJ88XSk.png]
[Image: ka0AQa5.png][Image: QwWqCS8.png]
  Reply  
Offline SummerMcLovin
11-12-2013, 04:18 PM,
#36
Former Admin
Posts: 3,080
Threads: 73
Joined: May 2012

You'll have to forgive me for my mistaken comment about Xenos and Hogosha fighting in vanilla, what I was actually thinking of was that they were the two vanilla enemies of the Junkers. There is some opportunity to get along (before you get all isolationist on me, similar to the Corsair relations in my mind) instead. Either way, this was just something I thought of when you asked, not the intention of adding Shikoku to the ZoI. "Pews" was a joke-y way of saying "interactions", although with a Xeno a lot of interactions will involve shooting and terrorism (as it should be).

(11-10-2013, 06:52 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: Surely Evo has the right to agree/disagree with this change, and to make his judgement on what the Xeno ZoI should be?
For the XA-, sure. If you don't want to RP there, it's your loss. I'm sure some indies can find some level or reasoning to go there.

If it does become a serious problem in the future, it might be reconsidered.

Kingdom of Bretonia
Colonial Republic
Independent Miners Guild
Ex-Admin
Reply  
Offline Zelot
11-12-2013, 04:40 PM, (This post was last modified: 11-12-2013, 04:42 PM by Zelot.)
#37
Member
Posts: 7,539
Threads: 379
Joined: Jun 2007

There actually was some player rp agreement way back in the day between the Hogs under Pipboy and the Xenos under Del that basicly split up Kepler with both sides being able to go into the others terriroty to chase Junkers, but only to chase junkers. The Xeners stayed in Southern section of Kepler and the Hogs staying in the North. The really annoying thing about this is that it sets up a situation where the Xenos are allowed to raid into someone elses house, but the people in that house can't respond in the same way.

BTW, how do you get to better relations between the Hogs and Xenos or FA and Xenos if you are sending the Xenos in to raid and fight? I assume that you can still go out of your ZOI as long as you don't start a fight, so what was the problem with the old situation with this?

[Image: 13121_s.gif]  
Reply  
Offline Highland Laddie
11-12-2013, 04:44 PM,
#38
Member
Posts: 2,082
Threads: 21
Joined: Mar 2013

Quote:...Or is Magellan now the new Conn?

IMO...whatever gets people RP fighting instead of Conn fighting is a good thing.
Reply  
Offline SnakThree
11-12-2013, 05:04 PM,
#39
Member
Posts: 9,091
Threads: 337
Joined: Mar 2010

(11-12-2013, 04:44 PM)Highland Laddie Wrote:
Quote:...Or is Magellan now the new Conn?

IMO...whatever gets people RP fighting instead of Conn fighting is a good thing.

[Image: rTrJole.png][Image: LJ88XSk.png]
[Image: ka0AQa5.png][Image: QwWqCS8.png]
  Reply  
Offline Haste
11-12-2013, 10:28 PM,
#40
Lead Developer
Posts: 3,574
Threads: 107
Joined: May 2012
Staff roles:
Balance Dev

(11-11-2013, 08:51 AM)Snak3 Wrote: So, let's say, Isejins in Magellan are out of their ZoI? Or is Magellan now the new Conn?

Please note that there is one particular Iseijin that has an unusual background for the faction, and operates in Liberty, which explains entirely why they'd be in Magellan as well.

[Image: cdSeFev.png]
Reply  
Pages (5): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode