• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 143 144 145 146 147 … 780 Next »
Is the spyglass scanners ingame cost a reflection on their actual worth?

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (2): 1 2 Next »
Is the spyglass scanners ingame cost a reflection on their actual worth?
Offline Hidamari
01-11-2014, 05:58 PM,
#1
Member
Posts: 2,100
Threads: 217
Joined: Jul 2009

"Would it cost less inrp, but for 'balance' reasons must be pricy to give incentive to trade"

thoughts?

[Image: RKaqSve.png]
Reply  
Offline teschy
01-11-2014, 06:15 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-11-2014, 06:16 PM by teschy.)
#2
20yrs & I Only Got This Title
Posts: 2,471
Threads: 24
Joined: Jan 2007

I don't know about that, but the fact that fighters have the power requirements and space to carry a battleship scanner is kinda.. unrealistic? It's like cap thrusters on bombers all over again.
Reply  
Offline Hidamari
01-11-2014, 06:29 PM,
#3
Member
Posts: 2,100
Threads: 217
Joined: Jul 2009

As far as i was aware the spyglass scanner is the fighter equivalent to the battleship scanner. (aren't they two separate objects altogether?)

[Image: RKaqSve.png]
Reply  
Offline Valrin
01-11-2014, 06:45 PM,
#4
Member
Posts: 241
Threads: 10
Joined: Jul 2013

(01-11-2014, 06:29 PM)Hidamari Wrote: As far as i was aware the spyglass scanner is the fighter equivalent to the battleship scanner. (aren't they two separate objects altogether?)

That's what I always thought >_>
I mean if they couldn't be used on fighters....why would the Lane Hackers both stealing it? Tongue

IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT I SAID, IT MATTERS WHAT I MEANT!!!!
Quote:please go learn to english
Reply  
Offline teschy
01-11-2014, 06:46 PM,
#5
20yrs & I Only Got This Title
Posts: 2,471
Threads: 24
Joined: Jan 2007

(01-11-2014, 06:29 PM)Hidamari Wrote: As far as i was aware the spyglass scanner is the fighter equivalent to the battleship scanner. (aren't they two separate objects altogether?)


Well, as far as I know, the Spyglass Scanner was only available on the Spyglass Battleship. Either way, I saw actual Battleship Scanners on fighter ships, not the spyglass kind.
Reply  
Offline AshHill07
01-11-2014, 06:48 PM,
#6
Member
Posts: 896
Threads: 28
Joined: Feb 2010

Both spyglass and Battleship scanners are exactly the same (The reason the Lane Hacters stole it was so they and the Hellfire Legion could use it on thier Spyglass class battleships, hence the name).

I have a spyglass scanner on my Dread, because why not.

[Image: AshHill07.gif]
\\ CDR David Roberts \\ CAPT Steven Eversman \\ VADM Ash Hill // RDML Chris Murray // CDR Mick Connors //
\\ SFC| Patrol-7 \\ SFC| LNS-California \\ SFC| LNT-Century // SFC| LNS-San.Francisco // SFC| Patrol-5 //
Reply  
Offline Valrin
01-11-2014, 06:51 PM,
#7
Member
Posts: 241
Threads: 10
Joined: Jul 2013

That is true about the Spyglass Battleship....they should just bring that back Tongue (only for the LH~ leader ofc (why was it even taken out?))
And yes...I have seen Battleship scanners on fighters...and that is just retarded >_>

IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT I SAID, IT MATTERS WHAT I MEANT!!!!
Quote:please go learn to english
Reply  
Offline Hidamari
01-11-2014, 07:04 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-11-2014, 07:05 PM by Hidamari.)
#8
Member
Posts: 2,100
Threads: 217
Joined: Jul 2009

(01-11-2014, 05:58 PM)Hidamari Wrote: "Would it cost less inrp, but for 'balance' reasons must be pricy to give incentive to trade"

[Image: RKaqSve.png]
Reply  
Offline Valrin
01-11-2014, 07:17 PM,
#9
Member
Posts: 241
Threads: 10
Joined: Jul 2013

I would say yes....seeing as it costs not to much more then a cruiser and I'm sure a cruiser is much more complicated with all it's stuff.....but that's just what I say.

IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT I SAID, IT MATTERS WHAT I MEANT!!!!
Quote:please go learn to english
Reply  
Offline Omicron
01-11-2014, 07:25 PM,
#10
The Order
Posts: 4,746
Threads: 387
Joined: Nov 2009

(01-11-2014, 06:29 PM)Hidamari Wrote: As far as i was aware the spyglass scanner is the fighter equivalent to the battleship scanner. (aren't they two separate objects altogether?)

Nope.

The smallest ship INRP capable to field spyglass scanner is Resheph. Anyone who says he mounted it on ships other than Spyglass/Arbiter and Resheph is just OORP.

[Image: E9d8RnV.jpg?1]
Reply  
Pages (2): 1 2 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode