• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General News and Announcements
« Previous 1 … 25 26 27 28 29 … 46 Next »
Developer Notice: Player Owned Bases Update

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (18): « Previous 1 … 14 15 16 17 18 Next »
Developer Notice: Player Owned Bases Update
Offline Lumik
03-16-2014, 04:25 PM,
#161
Member
Posts: 366
Threads: 23
Joined: Sep 2011

(03-16-2014, 12:36 PM)E.T. Wrote:
(03-15-2014, 07:40 PM)Singularity Wrote:
(03-15-2014, 05:55 PM)Saronsen Wrote: Just a heads up, we have 6 Jormungands and 3 or 4 Vidars/Hels shooting a Core 1 base, and it's out repairing us still.

Quit whining about your oh-so-vulnerable base.

and it was continued for more than 2 hours. Still the base got no scratch. Should be a bug.

well I will explain it.. If the base has repair commodities and still enough crew then it will not die. This is something cannon added I think when he implemented the pob. So even when you have a huge force the base will not die. Because every x seconds the base has still enough repairs.

You would say but when under siege these repairs do multiply. That's correct, but if I read it correctly those are made half here too. So end result. Less supply and almost same amount of siegetime.

This was different. The bug you speak about is that base ends at 2 % of HP and then it stays with this despite the firepower is still the same like before. What happened yesterday was that despite more than enough firepower was used, the base was still at 100 % (sometimes 99 % and then it returned to 100). So probably shield efficiency was somehow bugged (my wild guess).


[Image: fFZqBwL.png][Image: 0xCVMYl.png][Image: 1MoJa5S.png]

<> Information <> Recruitment <> Wanderlust Magazine <>
Reply  
Offline Shizune
03-20-2014, 08:43 PM, (This post was last modified: 03-20-2014, 08:45 PM by Shizune.)
#162
Member
Posts: 1,256
Threads: 201
Joined: Mar 2012

After reading a few things from everyone's side, let me just state some simple facts of life.

Stations are made of metal which is weak to anti-matter which bombers, cruisers, gunships and battleships can all carry.

If this was real, the anti-matter would obliterate a station upon first impact with its shields off and would insta-kill a platform as well

On another side, of things, look at all NPC bases in disco. All of them are being supplied by NPC's, including illegal bases by pirate freighters EVERY DAY, 24/7.

If a base gets attacked, then it gets attacked, oh well. PoB's are just overly complaced NPC bases.

We are the NPC suppliers and we are the NPC destroyers of said base when its found. They get supplies and what not and can be destroyed even if they get to it.

Like I said, be thankful the dev's did this rather then drop it to: 1 BS heavy mortar + hitting base reactor = boom. Because in RP that's what would happen and to say, those bases have one reactor and due to their size and shape, their not that shielded when they are hit, they would fully explode and kill everyone inside the base and destroy all cargo.

That is not the case.

Lyoko Project Files
Project's Leader Aelita X. Stone.
Reply  
Online Lord Caedus
03-21-2014, 09:42 AM,
#163
Malta's Bane
Posts: 676
Threads: 64
Joined: Jun 2013

(03-15-2014, 10:19 PM)Narcotic Wrote: I miss McBaseslayer. Sad

Summer is Coming

[Image: eHPLi2z.gif]
Reply  
Offline Zayne Carrick
03-28-2014, 10:28 AM,
#164
Member
Posts: 1,523
Threads: 97
Joined: Apr 2012

Update's applied already?
Reply  
Offline Zen_Mechanics
03-28-2014, 01:14 PM,
#165
Member
Posts: 2,262
Threads: 196
Joined: Oct 2012

Yes i believe they are.

Were fools to make war on our brothers in arms.

Reply  
Offline AshHill07
03-28-2014, 01:31 PM,
#166
Member
Posts: 896
Threads: 28
Joined: Feb 2010

Well Melbourne Station is still eating RA at the normal, pre-update, rate. So either this hasen't been put up yet, or its not working correctly.

[Image: AshHill07.gif]
\\ CDR David Roberts \\ CAPT Steven Eversman \\ VADM Ash Hill // RDML Chris Murray // CDR Mick Connors //
\\ SFC| Patrol-7 \\ SFC| LNS-California \\ SFC| LNT-Century // SFC| LNS-San.Francisco // SFC| Patrol-5 //
Reply  
Offline St.Denis
03-28-2014, 03:41 PM,
#167
Member
Posts: 100,633
Threads: 1,349
Joined: Dec 2011

In response to the question of whether the changes have been implemented. I am not sure but that the Bases still use the same amount of RA each day is not an indicator as will be seen by the quotes below.

Quote:As I said in my previous post the Base 'ticks' every 20 seconds. In that 20 seconds the Base previously took 1/3 of 600 damage = 200 damage and then repair it with 2 RA. Now the Base takes 1/3 of 300 damage = 100 damage and still requires 2 RA to repair the damage. 2 RA is the minimum Repair Materials used.

Quote:The highlighted part in the quote is the important part. Having 3 Repair Materials allows the base to repair 180,000 damage every 20 seconds. 1 Repair Material allows the Base to repair 60,000 damage every 20 seconds.

So it doesn't matter whether the Base takes 1 damage every 20 seconds or 60,000 every 20 seconds it will still use 2 RA in 1 'tick'.

So, unless the Devs have changed the time between each of these 'ticks' the wear and tear usage will not change.


Quote:Wear & tear damage reduced to 300 per minute per core (previously 600)

All this will do is double the time a Base will take to decay if it has run out of Repair Materials and it only takes Wear and Tear damage.

Under the old system of 600 damage per Core per minute a Core 4 Base with 24 million Health Points would take 24000000 divided (600 x 4) = 10,000 minutes or 166.67 hours or 6.94 days to decay to 0% Health.

With the implementation of the new new figure of 300/minute that same Base would take 13.88 days to decay to 0% Health.

So your guess is as good as mine whether it has actually been implemented.

'I would like to be half as clever as some people like to believe they are'
Life is full of disappointments, it is how we handle them that helps to define us, as a person
Reply  
Offline Zayne Carrick
03-29-2014, 08:11 PM,
#168
Member
Posts: 1,523
Threads: 97
Joined: Apr 2012

Well, current siege of Seelower Hoehen by Rheinland Military clearly shows that bases're still on 99%
Reply  
Offline Kazinsal
03-29-2014, 08:18 PM,
#169
Wizard
Posts: 4,541
Threads: 230
Joined: Sep 2009

I disagree greatly.

[Image: hvEeky8.png]

Retired, permanently.
Reply  
Offline Zayne Carrick
03-29-2014, 08:26 PM,
#170
Member
Posts: 1,523
Threads: 97
Joined: Apr 2012

If you say so...
They had a battleship+4 cruisers.
...
Ok, I'm bad at maths.
Reply  
Pages (18): « Previous 1 … 14 15 16 17 18 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode