• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General News and Announcements
« Previous 1 … 23 24 25 26 27 … 46 Next »
New POB feature: Blacklisting

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (5): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
New POB feature: Blacklisting
Offline NoMe
01-04-2015, 12:44 PM,
#31
Savage
Posts: 2,006
Threads: 355
Joined: Jun 2011

that mean that the base is open for all or is it a + ?

[Image: Rzg7yMW.jpg]
Reply  
Offline Remnant
01-04-2015, 01:24 PM,
#32
Member
Posts: 2,206
Threads: 248
Joined: Apr 2012

(01-04-2015, 11:32 AM)FynnMcScrap Wrote: .... thinks about adding [ADMIN] to the blacklist,

Don't worry, bases automatically like us.

We know when you're sleeping.
We know when you're awake.
We know when your playerbase is misbehaving.
So be good for goodness sake.

Nope. Too late, holiday is over.
Reply  
Offline Alestone
01-04-2015, 05:07 PM,
#33
Alestone Enterprises
Posts: 761
Threads: 75
Joined: Nov 2014

The earlier posts imply wildcarding. Is that only for the start of a name, eg: [Star]Frigga, or will it also recognize a string at the end of the list, eg: Pickled|Idiot with |Idiot being the string?

Alestone Enterprises
The Power To Get You There!

Reply  
Offline Parthenogenesis
01-04-2015, 06:34 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-04-2015, 06:36 PM by Parthenogenesis.)
#34
Banned
Posts: 27
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2014

Great new expansion. Thanks Al.

Not sure if this is the right place to kick off a discussion, but maybe with this new feature, it would make sense to remove automated attacks by bases (meaning automated blacklisting by getting shoting or by reputiation), and require RP prior to blacklisting a ship, just like RP prior to any sort of PvP?

Sure would make bases less annoying.

User was banned for: K4RL0TTA
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline Alley
01-04-2015, 09:37 PM,
#35
Member
Posts: 4,524
Threads: 406
Joined: Jun 2009

(01-04-2015, 05:07 PM)Twaddle Wrote: The earlier posts imply wildcarding. Is that only for the start of a name, eg: [Star]Frigga, or will it also recognize a string at the end of the list, eg: Pickled|Idiot with |Idiot being the string?

Only for the start of a name or a complete name.

If you blacklist [Star], it will make hostile any ship starting with [Star] but will not make hostile a ship named Iam[Star]Magic.
If you blacklist |Idiot, Pickled|Idiot will not be hostile because it would work if you blacklisted Pickled|Idiot.

The reason for this is to prevent accidental matches, for instance there used to be that problem between the Council and USI factions where the council tag was [C] and the USI had a Clerk rank. It did things like [C]-Magic.Versailles and [USI]-Bob.MuchMoney[C]. If you blacklisted [C] instead of [C]-, the USI dude would have ended up as hostile to the base and wouldn't know why at all.

It isn't an oversight, it's intended to reduce the amount of potential problems.

Laz Wrote: Alley was right.
Reply  
Offline Parthenogenesis
01-04-2015, 10:01 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-04-2015, 10:03 PM by Parthenogenesis.)
#36
Banned
Posts: 27
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2014

That creates exploitable loopholes, such as Selfish.Reaver

User was banned for: K4RL0TTA
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline Alley
01-04-2015, 10:05 PM,
#37
Member
Posts: 4,524
Threads: 406
Joined: Jun 2009

I'm aware of that. The thing is, I rather have someone be able to shoot the base (and turn hostile anyway) or dock but do nothing instead of having a random unrelated dude get killed by the base with no idea what just happened.

It's also why we should enforce a TagShipname convention for factions to finally solve this. It should never be ShipnameTag.

Laz Wrote: Alley was right.
Reply  
Offline Zed26
01-04-2015, 10:21 PM,
#38
Member
Posts: 324
Threads: 12
Joined: Mar 2010

(01-04-2015, 10:01 PM)Parthenogenesis Wrote: That creates exploitable loopholes, such as Selfish.Reaver
Despite using the term "tag" for the feature, you can still add the full name of each Reaver individually for the same effect. Minor inconvenience for avoiding killing the wrong people.
Reply  
Offline Parthenogenesis
01-04-2015, 10:25 PM,
#39
Banned
Posts: 27
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2014

I'm guessing it greatly reduces the amount of flipflops per bubblesort aka performance search lags then. Would still be neat if this enabled some sort of must RP before set-to-shoot tho.

User was banned for: K4RL0TTA
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline Alestone
01-05-2015, 08:20 AM,
#40
Alestone Enterprises
Posts: 761
Threads: 75
Joined: Nov 2014

Too much potential for abuse there. You drop an attack warning, wait an hour and blitz the base, knowing that the timing will have precluded a response.

Alestone Enterprises
The Power To Get You There!

Reply  
Pages (5): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode