• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 93 94 95 96 97 … 547 Next »
Battleship Scanners, 250 Mil for 4k of extra cargo range

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (2): 1 2 Next »
Battleship Scanners, 250 Mil for 4k of extra cargo range
Offline Stoner_Steve
02-13-2015, 05:16 PM,
#1
Master of Arms
Posts: 2,560
Threads: 341
Joined: Jan 2014

Given the current scanning range of the battleship scanner compared to the deep scanner. I was wondering if any further changes were going to come to the battleship scanner, namely an increase in scanning rage or a decrease in price. It doesn't make sense that a deep scanner, valued at like 50k, has the same range as the battleship scanner with a value at 250 mil, en essence a player is paying 249.99 million for an extra 4k of cargo scanning range.

[Image: O2vt8So.png]
SLRC Faction Document | SLRC Recruitment | SLRC Feedback | SLRC Message Dump
Reply  
Offline zslayern
02-13-2015, 05:19 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-13-2015, 05:19 PM by zslayern.)
#2
Member
Posts: 139
Threads: 3
Joined: Oct 2014

Battleship scanner also functions as a battleship "license" just so you know
Reply  
Offline Rebirth
02-13-2015, 05:25 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-13-2015, 05:44 PM by Rebirth.)
#3
Member
Posts: 417
Threads: 42
Joined: Dec 2013

BS Scanner used as BS licence, I haven't heard that since .85. 75 % of the capitals (BS/Carriers) fly around with deep space scanners anymore, as they don't want to buy a BS scanner since it has no valuable use.
And please do not decrease(former increase, wot wot wot I know MISTAKES HAPPEN Q_Q) it's price, that would ruin a lot. It was 250 million and it will (hopefully) stay so.
imho increase the price of deep scanner
Reply  
Offline Stoner_Steve
02-13-2015, 05:29 PM,
#4
Master of Arms
Posts: 2,560
Threads: 341
Joined: Jan 2014

(02-13-2015, 05:25 PM)Rebirth Wrote: And please do not increase it's price

(02-13-2015, 05:16 PM)Captain_Nemo Wrote: I was wondering if any further changes were going to come to the battleship scanner, namely an increase in scanning rage or a decrease in price

Your powers of observation are astounding
Reply  
Offline Rebirth
02-13-2015, 05:44 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-13-2015, 05:44 PM by Rebirth.)
#5
Member
Posts: 417
Threads: 42
Joined: Dec 2013

I meant decrease, I'm not a native english speaker mistakes happen eh it would be logically that it's decrease anyways
Reply  
Offline Kosa
02-13-2015, 09:30 PM,
#6
Member
Posts: 378
Threads: 82
Joined: Dec 2011

I guess it's more of a symbol of status than an actual equipment of use.
Like the difference between a Mercedes and a Skoda. There is not much actual difference between the two if you look its usefulness. The extra power and comfort is rarely used but it's good for showing off.

[Image: unknown_alpha.png]
Reply  
Offline Binski
02-13-2015, 09:57 PM,
#7
Member
Posts: 1,531
Threads: 96
Joined: Jun 2013

Its a shame whats been done to the Battleship Scanner. The energy nerf was fair, stops snubs from using them. However now its pointless to have such a nerf, can't be that much more power needed to only get +4k of cargo scanning range, right?? RIGHT??

It seems to me that those making the decisions regarding cloaks must only be looking at the numbers on a grid, comparing them, but not really playing and feeling out how it really works out in the game environment. Not only did it kill the scanner's application but killed a lot of the market value people carefully chose to invest with. I gave up complaining because through the changes its quite apparent the main goal now is to eliminate any detection advantage one player can get over another. Ironically everything about all of this equipment, scanners, cloaks, that made me think AWESOME when realizing its capabilities has been removed, nerfed and repealed. But instead of the desired result the admins/devs were going for, I think people just rely more on the chat list now than taking a risk in game with the help of a longer ranged scanner, which was well worth the investment.

[Image: G38aJ6J.jpg]
The Further Exploits of Captain Antares (August 2015) │ (alt) JonasHudson
*Argo | Special Operative ID (Approved Request)* | Argo Compilation Video
################ *Proposed OF Challenge System* ################
############### The Book of Piracy (Piracy Tutorial) ###############
############### Binski Alamo (Youtube Channel) ###############
Reply  
Offline Tachyon
02-14-2015, 12:17 AM,
#8
Freelancer for Life
Posts: 2,664
Threads: 53
Joined: May 2011

Not only is a BS scanner a way to show off, 4k+ cargo scan range and therewith being the best scanner, 250M is an okay price.

[Image: vJQQbhu.png]
Reply  
Offline Hidamari
02-14-2015, 12:32 AM,
#9
Member
Posts: 2,100
Threads: 217
Joined: Jul 2009

anything that isnt a combat capital ship of cruiser class and up should get 0% core recharge for mounting one.

and then it should get its stats back to how they were before.

[Image: RKaqSve.png]
Reply  
Offline Jack_Henderson
02-14-2015, 12:50 AM,
#10
Independent Miners Guild
Posts: 6,103
Threads: 391
Joined: Nov 2010

The stats now are a little lulzy for a prcie that that is... enormously higher than the standard equipment.

However, the experiments have proven that giving the BS scanner a significant advantage in scanning distance was used by traders to circumvent interaction with pirates. And that is detrimental for the game.

It would not feel like soooo overpriced, if it at least had +1k distance, or even +2. For the large transports it makes no difference, as they turn so slowly, and caps would have that little moment when the enemy snubs cannot yet see it.

+ IMG| DISCORD: https://discord.gg/TWrGWjp
+ IMG| IS RECRUITING: Click to find out more!
Reply  
Pages (2): 1 2 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode