(03-02-2015, 05:31 PM)Snak3 Wrote: I am sure that you will be able to request Saltese to be relocated near those mining fields. Stop crapping your pants.
No point, it'll just be Rayburn all over again where inRP it would never make sense that HF would allow a Junker POB to be made in their home system, much like how GRN would never allow a POB to be made on the Leeds JH in New London.
It's probably just best it gets moved to Puerto Rico or Kansas, for the sake of activity, sense and player investment.
(03-02-2015, 10:21 AM)Snak3 Wrote: Sadly, it was also used to block RP between pirates and miners. So I guess it's fair to say this change has pros and cons.
(03-02-2015, 05:31 PM)Snak3 Wrote: I am sure that you will be able to request Saltese to be relocated near those mining fields. Stop crapping your pants.
(03-02-2015, 05:37 PM)Snak3 Wrote:
(03-02-2015, 05:34 PM)Sabru Wrote: Hmm.. Saltese moved into Vespucci? i'd be willing to bet credits that the first siege would happen within lets ssy, a week at the latest. HF fleet pounding down junker doors in HF home. certainly would make it easy on them XD
Cool. Constant activity.
(02-28-2015, 06:57 PM)Snak3 Wrote:
-Remarkable nonsense-
Junker is still making 21% more.
The propensity for out-of-context remarks made in relation to anything even somewhat-related to Junker activity, coupled with a clear lack of understanding of how actual in-gameplay operations are executed and played out, is becoming redundant at an extreme rate.
I find your lack of faith [and knowledge] disturbing.
Sieging a base for days, paperweight on the mouse button.. your idea of 'constant activity' is of great quality.
Tell me again what your complaints about other's activity regard?
Please stick to remarking on things that relate to your actual gameplay experience, versus the things you simply imagine or wish to see not be a part of other's experience.
At the very least to save credibility, and not to appear to be such a hypocritical bigot.
(03-02-2015, 05:31 PM)Snak3 Wrote: I am sure that you will be able to request Saltese to be relocated near those mining fields. Stop crapping your pants.
No point, it'll just be Rayburn all over again where inRP it would never make sense that HF would allow a Junker POB to be made in their home system, much like how GRN would never allow a POB to be made on the Leeds JH in New London.
It's probably just best it gets moved to Puerto Rico or Kansas, for the sake of activity, sense and player investment.
To become useless ans spend player time to fuel it? Anyway, since when a faction get an Ore field in his home system. I don't say it has something to see with the fact that echo is HF leader, but you have to admit that it's strange.
Especially just after Hf started hostilities with us when we were neutral since a while. Coincidence, Coincidence.
(03-02-2015, 05:50 PM)larzac Wrote: Especially just after Hf started hostilities with us when we were neutral since a while. Coincidence, Coincidence.
inb4 conspir[A]cy
At any rate can we legitimately consider dumping the Kansas name for Humboldt? I'm not talking about the systems and objects instead of it, just the system names.
(03-02-2015, 05:31 PM)Snak3 Wrote: I am sure that you will be able to request Saltese to be relocated near those mining fields. Stop crapping your pants.
No point, it'll just be Rayburn all over again where inRP it would never make sense that HF would allow a Junker POB to be made in their home system, much like how GRN would never allow a POB to be made on the Leeds JH in New London.
It's probably just best it gets moved to Puerto Rico or Kansas, for the sake of activity, sense and player investment.
To become useless ans spend player time to fuel it? Anyway, since when a faction get an Ore field in his home system. I don't say it has something to see with the fact that echo is HF leader, but you have to admit that it's strange.
Especially just after Hf started hostilities with us when we were neutral since a while. Coincidence, Coincidence.
HF should be shooting Junkers already, but their ID prevents them from doing so. They used to be able to, but their IDs were overly nerfed.
(03-02-2015, 05:31 PM)Snak3 Wrote: I am sure that you will be able to request Saltese to be relocated near those mining fields. Stop crapping your pants.
No point, it'll just be Rayburn all over again where inRP it would never make sense that HF would allow a Junker POB to be made in their home system, much like how GRN would never allow a POB to be made on the Leeds JH in New London.
It's probably just best it gets moved to Puerto Rico or Kansas, for the sake of activity, sense and player investment.
To become useless ans spend player time to fuel it? Anyway, since when a faction get an Ore field in his home system. I don't say it has something to see with the fact that echo is HF leader, but you have to admit that it's strange.
Especially just after Hf started hostilities with us when we were neutral since a while. Coincidence, Coincidence.
HF should be shooting Junkers already, but their ID prevents them from doing so. They used to be able to, but their IDs were overly nerfed.
Well, when i read their Lore, i dont see why they should do that, sorry. I dont say they have to like us, but shoot us... well, no reason to do so.
Because its sooooo hard to bypass a base at a jumphole nowadays..
Oh not to mention the system is being de-guarded... Though its amazing the hate previously generated for a faction trying to "Guard" its "Guard System". Derrrrp
Not to mention there have been no attempts made to deprive others of entering Humboldt space...
Shall I continue or is this conspir[A]cy starting to accrue too many facts?
It would be refreshing to simply see a few changes made in an opposite manner than what has been previously done..
QQ Junkers too strongk QQ change change plox QQ all changes are justifiable since they too powerful anyway
People too busy crying about 'activity' lately to even notice that is half the reason why 'activity' remains so high.
Literally fueled by scrap and tears.. very few are mature enough to reconcile it in an alternative adult manner, so growth continues.
-
[5:57:11 PM] InfernalTater (Lewis) [Formerly TLI-Inferno]:meanwhile, Aces 'I don't always miss my destinations, but when I do, I'm on the other side of house space.'
(03-02-2015, 05:31 PM)Snak3 Wrote: I am sure that you will be able to request Saltese to be relocated near those mining fields. Stop crapping your pants.
No point, it'll just be Rayburn all over again where inRP it would never make sense that HF would allow a Junker POB to be made in their home system, much like how GRN would never allow a POB to be made on the Leeds JH in New London.
It's probably just best it gets moved to Puerto Rico or Kansas, for the sake of activity, sense and player investment.
To become useless ans spend player time to fuel it? Anyway, since when a faction get an Ore field in his home system. I don't say it has something to see with the fact that echo is HF leader, but you have to admit that it's strange.
Especially just after Hf started hostilities with us when we were neutral since a while. Coincidence, Coincidence.
Echo isn't HF leader. In fact Echo isn't even in HF HC.
Also, HF weren't neutral with Junkers, HF just had a very limited ID that allowed engagement of 6 other IDs and those IDs only. Ever since I've been in HF (which is since 4.85) HF is hostile to Junkers.
EDIT: Also, you are asking that server development will be done by PoB locations. I should remind you that unlike normal bases, PoBs aren't a constant. Lets say that the field stays as is, and tomorrow Saltese is destroyed by a fleet of Marduks, a server development was halted for a non-constant object.
![[Image: Lythrilux.gif]](https://sig.grumpybumpers.com/host/Lythrilux.gif)
![[Image: gy5uC5i.png?1]](http://i.imgur.com/gy5uC5i.png?1)
![[Image: p2SKLap.jpg?1]](http://i.imgur.com/p2SKLap.jpg?1)