• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion Discovery Mod Balance
« Previous 1 … 8 9 10 11 12 … 55 Next »
Salvager and Raba regen counts: too high?

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (27): « Previous 1 … 23 24 25 26 27 Next »
Thread Closed 
Salvager and Raba regen counts: too high?
Offline Lythrilux
04-17-2015, 09:08 PM, (This post was last modified: 04-17-2015, 09:16 PM by Lythrilux.)
#241
Edgy Worlds
Posts: 10,362
Threads: 737
Joined: Jan 2013

(04-17-2015, 09:05 PM)Hawksmoor Wrote:
(04-17-2015, 08:52 PM)Protégé Wrote:
Quote:I think "Lead" might be too strong a word in this case, perhaps "position of authority" is more appropriate. Also just because you play a Junker doesn't mean you are one or have their best interests at heart.
wtf?
He leads a junker faction. He leads JM. Fifth most active faction on the server.
What's the problem with understanding that?

Oh there's no misunderstanding that he runs a quasi-junker faction who's shown interest in starting a war Against Junkers so pardon me when i know for a fact he does not have the best interests of Junkers in mind.
Fyi JM weren't the ones who set their bases to hostile to fire on other Junkers including JM, as well as engaging JM ships and shooting Beaumont Spire. I've closed the lid on that episode but it saddens me that Congress never owned up for kicking off the drama at the time. That's the furthest I wish to discuss on that subject specifically.

Honestly, I do have my NPC factions interests at heart, but I also have the interests of the rest of the server at heart to. I'm not one-sided and I want what's best for everyone on the server, not just Junkers. Sometimes Junkers have to suffer a little for things to be balanced. I wouldn't really call the nerf suffering anyway, it's bringing back down from a pedestal that they were graciously put on. On the plus side by nerfing the Salvager this means that we can look at having a good Premium Scrap route again.

[Image: Lythrilux.gif]
Offline Shizune
04-17-2015, 09:12 PM, (This post was last modified: 04-17-2015, 09:14 PM by Shizune.)
#242
Member
Posts: 1,256
Threads: 201
Joined: Mar 2012

(04-17-2015, 09:05 PM)Hawksmoor Wrote:
(04-17-2015, 08:52 PM)Protégé Wrote:
Quote:I think "Lead" might be too strong a word in this case, perhaps "position of authority" is more appropriate. Also just because you play a Junker doesn't mean you are one or have their best interests at heart.
wtf?
He leads a junker faction. He leads JM. Fifth most active faction on the server.
What's the problem with understanding that?

Oh there's no misunderstanding that he runs a quasi-junker faction who's shown interest in starting a war Against Junkers so pardon me when i know for a fact he does not have the best interests of Junkers in mind.

As much as I've ignored this babble of stupidity between Junker factions, sometimes I wonder if Congress or anyone takes a moment to sit back and look at what their typing before posting. I hate to say this, but this thread is soon to derail into "He/she said that/this" and it will devolve more into more flame wars till the admins/devs do more that one party won't like.

How about this, and yes, I'm speaking to the Congress on this. HOW ABOUT, and Just hear me out, you sit back, shut up for a few minutes and READ the entire thing before sending a post. Some of your members do such, others cause more trouble, and sorry to saw Hawk but your posting is not helping anyone's case, if anything, your digging yourself a pit in which the others will gladly bury you in.

Remember this, its a game. Why get upset over 1's and 0's on a glass/liquid screen? Whats done is done, move on before this thread becomes more that were ALL going to regret...

Edit: Typing on an ipad, but you get the point. I think this thread should be locked
Offline t0l
04-17-2015, 09:18 PM,
#243
Space Operator
Posts: 1,827
Threads: 134
Joined: Feb 2013

(04-17-2015, 09:08 PM)Lythrilux Wrote:
(04-17-2015, 09:05 PM)Hawksmoor Wrote:
(04-17-2015, 08:52 PM)Protégé Wrote:
Quote:I think "Lead" might be too strong a word in this case, perhaps "position of authority" is more appropriate. Also just because you play a Junker doesn't mean you are one or have their best interests at heart.
wtf?
He leads a junker faction. He leads JM. Fifth most active faction on the server.
What's the problem with understanding that?

Oh there's no misunderstanding that he runs a quasi-junker faction who's shown interest in starting a war Against Junkers so pardon me when i know for a fact he does not have the best interests of Junkers in mind.
Fyi JM weren't the ones who set their bases to hostile to fire on other Junkers including JM, as well as engaging JM ships and shooting Beaumont Spire. I've closed the lid on that episode but it saddens me that Congress never owned up for kicking off the drama at the time.

Come on, Lyth. Everyone knows the Junker Marauders aren't Junkers, they're Marauders!

Back on topic, please don't start this again. I don't think we need more .:j:./JM| drama.

[Image: PFjFVMW.png]
Offline Hawksmoor
04-17-2015, 09:19 PM,
#244
Member
Posts: 80
Threads: 7
Joined: Jul 2014

(04-17-2015, 09:08 PM)Lythrilux Wrote:
(04-17-2015, 09:05 PM)Hawksmoor Wrote:
(04-17-2015, 08:52 PM)Protégé Wrote:
Quote:I think "Lead" might be too strong a word in this case, perhaps "position of authority" is more appropriate. Also just because you play a Junker doesn't mean you are one or have their best interests at heart.
wtf?
He leads a junker faction. He leads JM. Fifth most active faction on the server.
What's the problem with understanding that?

Oh there's no misunderstanding that he runs a quasi-junker faction who's shown interest in starting a war Against Junkers so pardon me when i know for a fact he does not have the best interests of Junkers in mind.
Fyi JM weren't the ones who set their bases to hostile to fire on other Junkers including JM, as well as engaging JM ships and shooting Beaumont Spire. I've closed the lid on that episode but it saddens me that Congress never owned up for kicking off the drama at the time.

The way people see it JM engaged Congress and no Congress was involved in the shooting of Beaumont Spire. There were a lot of people involved like Rogues and OC perhaps others but not 1 Congress shot that base. Congress never starts the drama too, they just want it to stop but it seems certain unsavory people on this server will not let it go. In the end though there's less and less unsavory people. It always seems they eventually get banned or lose their ships or just leave. It's funny how Congress doesn't eh? LOL the whiney babies have to resort to admin/dev help to hurt the Congress.
Offline Lythrilux
04-17-2015, 09:23 PM,
#245
Edgy Worlds
Posts: 10,362
Threads: 737
Joined: Jan 2013

(04-17-2015, 09:19 PM)Hawksmoor Wrote: The way people see it JM engaged Congress and no Congress was involved in the shooting of Beaumont Spire.
There were a lot of people involved like Rogues and OC perhaps others but not 1 Congress shot that base. Congress never starts the drama too, they just want it to stop but it seems certain unsavory people on this server will not let it go.
I have loads of proof to suggest otherwise.

(04-17-2015, 09:19 PM)Hawksmoor Wrote: LOL the whiney babies have to resort to admin/dev help to hurt the Congress.
I'm not trying to 'hurt' the Congress or Junkers with the nerf. It 'hurts' me too btw.

[Image: Lythrilux.gif]
Offline Hawksmoor
04-17-2015, 09:29 PM,
#246
Member
Posts: 80
Threads: 7
Joined: Jul 2014

(04-17-2015, 09:23 PM)Lythrilux Wrote:
(04-17-2015, 09:19 PM)Hawksmoor Wrote: The way people see it JM engaged Congress and no Congress was involved in the shooting of Beaumont Spire.
There were a lot of people involved like Rogues and OC perhaps others but not 1 Congress shot that base. Congress never starts the drama too, they just want it to stop but it seems certain unsavory people on this server will not let it go.
I have loads of proof to suggest otherwise

Let's see this "proof".
Offline Hawksmoor
04-17-2015, 09:32 PM,
#247
Member
Posts: 80
Threads: 7
Joined: Jul 2014

(04-17-2015, 09:23 PM)Lythrilux Wrote:
(04-17-2015, 09:19 PM)Hawksmoor Wrote: [quote='Hawksmoor' pid='1659885' dateline='1429301987']
LOL the whiney babies have to resort to admin/dev help to hurt the Congress.
I'm not trying to 'hurt' the Congress or Junkers with the nerf. It 'hurts' me too btw.

I doubt you fly a sally that often and you admitted to pirating sallys. So i find it hard to believe it "hurts" you when you pirate sallys more than fly them.
Offline Lythrilux
04-17-2015, 09:46 PM,
#248
Edgy Worlds
Posts: 10,362
Threads: 737
Joined: Jan 2013

(04-17-2015, 09:29 PM)Hawksmoor Wrote:
(04-17-2015, 09:23 PM)Lythrilux Wrote:
(04-17-2015, 09:19 PM)Hawksmoor Wrote: The way people see it JM engaged Congress and no Congress was involved in the shooting of Beaumont Spire.
There were a lot of people involved like Rogues and OC perhaps others but not 1 Congress shot that base. Congress never starts the drama too, they just want it to stop but it seems certain unsavory people on this server will not let it go.
I have loads of proof to suggest otherwise

Let's see this "proof".
If you insist I can send you proof privately. I am not posting it publicly on the forums however because I don't want to drag Congress's reputation through the mud, especially considering this stuff happened a long time ago.

(04-17-2015, 09:32 PM)Hawksmoor Wrote:
(04-17-2015, 09:23 PM)Lythrilux Wrote:
(04-17-2015, 09:19 PM)Hawksmoor Wrote: [quote='Hawksmoor' pid='1659885' dateline='1429301987']
LOL the whiney babies have to resort to admin/dev help to hurt the Congress.
I'm not trying to 'hurt' the Congress or Junkers with the nerf. It 'hurts' me too btw.

I doubt you fly a sally that often and you admitted to pirating sallys. So i find it hard to believe it "hurts" you when you pirate sallys more than fly them.
http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread...pid1659193

I bought one the other day. I already own 5 Salvagers.

[Image: Lythrilux.gif]
Offline Hawksmoor
04-17-2015, 09:52 PM, (This post was last modified: 04-17-2015, 09:55 PM by Hawksmoor.)
#249
Member
Posts: 80
Threads: 7
Joined: Jul 2014

I came here to say what i wanted to say, basically this server is run by ineffectual, biased people who take orders from people who whine about how they can't kill something 1v1 so the ship has to be nerfed and it never crosses their mind that maybe they met a good pilot and they themselves are not very good. The one admin that could be counted on to right the wrongs of others they decided to remove so i no longer have any confidence that detrimental issues concerning the Congress will be addressed. I'm done, thanks.
Offline mwerte
04-17-2015, 10:00 PM,
#250
Old Man
Posts: 4,049
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2007

(04-17-2015, 09:52 PM)Hawksmoor Wrote: basically this server is run by ineffectual, biased people who take orders

Why thank you. You warm my cheeks.


 
Pages (27): « Previous 1 … 23 24 25 26 27 Next »
Thread Closed 


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode