• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 97 98 99 100 101 … 780 Next »
Poll: The Anticheat

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Answer to the post
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
I rather have better obfuscation, even if it means potential false positive antivirus problems.
92.13%
82 92.13%
I rather have less obfuscation, even if it means more cheaters ingame.
7.87%
7 7.87%
Total 89 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4
Poll: The Anticheat
Offline Joggin
05-22-2015, 10:32 PM,
#31
Temporary Autonomous Zoners
Posts: 388
Threads: 20
Joined: Nov 2007

Yeah, hit the cheaters, false positives can be dealt with.

[Image: HTp8xpY.png]
Reply  
Offline Vigilia.Procuratio
05-23-2015, 12:17 PM,
#32
Member
Posts: 285
Threads: 17
Joined: Sep 2011

(05-22-2015, 12:07 PM)Plan-B Wrote: as programming sometimes - i know the Problems of false positive messages. The problem often is outdated sub DLL's or rather old programming stuff.

I expect the main problem here is the manner in which DSAce monitors real-time memory, which could mimic the activities of keyloggers or malware which actively checks to make sure it has been noticed. While DSAce would be doing nothing malicious, it could easily look like a nasty in the eyes of security programs. As long as it isn't watching the memory space of system processes or unrelated software then I'm good with it.
Reply  
Offline nOmnomnOm
05-23-2015, 12:52 PM,
#33
Probation
Posts: 5,913
Threads: 247
Joined: May 2011

Oh look there were more problems than expected?
Mmhmmmmm

Im gonna wait and download the update later when it all settles down....

[Image: zBEqQfl.jpg?1]
Reply  
Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode